Gaining and Maintaining a Competitive Edge: Evidence from CSA Members and Farmers on Local Food Marketing Strategies

Community-supported agriculture (CSA) is a widely-used approach for farmers to sell directly to consumers. We used the product, place, price, and promotion (4P) marketing mix framework to examine characteristics that help farms offering CSA maintain member satisfaction and thus competitiveness. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 CSA members and 24 CSA farmers in four states. CSA members additionally completed a modified choice experiment. Qualitative data were coded iteratively, and choice experiment data were summarized and compared across scenarios. CSA members and farmers were motivated by a range of personal, social, environmental, and economic objectives. Members favored high-quality staple vegetables (e.g., lettuce, green beans), ideally produced organically. Trust and a sense of personal connection with the farmer comprised part of the “value added” of CSA participation. Time and location of share pick-up were very important; thus, farmers tried to offer convenient sites or an enriched pick-up experience. Small changes in price appeared unlikely to impact participation among current members. Social networks and word-of-mouth were powerful for marketing, but may limit the ability to reach diverse populations. Future research should examine the ability of CSAs to meet the needs of those who do not currently participate.

[1]  J. Kolodinsky,et al.  A modified choice experiment to examine willingness to participate in a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) program among low-income parents , 2018, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[2]  E. McKee.  “It's the Amazon World”: Small‐Scale Farmers on an Entrepreneurial Treadmill , 2018 .

[3]  B. Campbell,et al.  A Choice Based Experiment of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA): A Valuation of Attributes , 2018, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[4]  B. Jablonski,et al.  The Financial Performance Implications of Differential Marketing Strategies: Exploring Farms that Pursue Local Markets as a Core Competitive Advantage , 2018, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[5]  D. Thilmany,et al.  Evaluating scale and technical efficiency among farms and ranches with a local market orientation , 2017, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[6]  Mikelis Grivins,et al.  Bricolage for Self‐Sufficiency: An Analysis of Alternative Food Networks , 2017 .

[7]  D. Tilman,et al.  Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice , 2017 .

[8]  Ryan E. Galt,et al.  What difference does income make for Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) members in California? Comparing lower-income and higher-income households , 2017 .

[9]  J. Kolodinsky,et al.  Farm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids (F3HK): An innovative community supported agriculture intervention to prevent childhood obesity in low-income families and strengthen local agricultural economies , 2017, BMC Public Health.

[10]  Zhifeng Gao,et al.  Factors Affecting Current and Future CSA Participation , 2017 .

[11]  Alison F. Davis,et al.  CSA shareholder food lifestyle behaviors: a comparison across consumer groups , 2017 .

[12]  M. Paul.  Farmer Perspectives on Livelihoods Within Community Supported Agriculture , 2016 .

[13]  Libby O. Christensen,et al.  Eroding the Community in Community Supported Agriculture (CSA): Competition's Effects in Alternative Food Networks in California , 2016 .

[14]  M. Freedman,et al.  Examining a New “Pay-as-You-Go” Community-Supported Agriculture (CSA) Model: A Case Study , 2016 .

[15]  T. Woods,et al.  CSAs and the Battle for the Local Food Dollar , 2015 .

[16]  A. Pole,et al.  Segmenting CSA members by motivation: anything but two peas in a pod , 2015 .

[17]  D. Conner,et al.  Stacking Beliefs and Participation in Alternative Food Systems , 2015 .

[18]  Leena Lankoski,et al.  The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: an examination through “alternative” characteristics , 2015 .

[19]  D. Conner,et al.  Institutional Demand for Locally-Grown Food in Vermont: Marketing Implications for Producers and Distributors , 2014 .

[20]  Ryan E. Galt,et al.  The Moral Economy Is a Double-edged Sword: Explaining Farmers’ Earnings and Self-exploitation in Community-Supported Agriculture , 2013 .

[21]  J. Ohls,et al.  SNAP Food Security In-Depth Interview Study , 2013 .

[22]  A. Pole,et al.  Farming alone? What’s up with the “C” in community supported agriculture , 2013 .

[23]  L. Zepeda,et al.  CSA membership and psychological needs fulfillment: an application of self-determination theory , 2013 .

[24]  Tara Garnett,et al.  Food sustainability: problems, perspectives and solutions , 2013, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[25]  Daniel Buck,et al.  Doing community supported agriculture: Tactile space, affect and effects of membership , 2012 .

[26]  A. Tregear.  Progressing knowledge in alternative and local food networks: Critical reflections and a research agenda , 2011 .

[27]  Christopher L. Dicken,et al.  Mapping Competition Zones for Vendors and Customers in U.S. Farmers Markets , 2011 .

[28]  Ryanne Pilgeram,et al.  “The Only Thing That Isn't Sustainable . . . Is the Farmer”: Social Sustainability and the Politics of Class among Pacific Northwest Farmers Engaged in Sustainable Farming , 2011 .

[29]  Emily Givens,et al.  Community Supported Agriculture , 2009 .

[30]  T. Macías.  Working Toward a Just, Equitable, and Local Food System: The Social Impact of Community-Based Agriculture* , 2008 .

[31]  L. Zepeda,et al.  The adaptive consumer: shifting attitudes, behavior change and CSA membership renewal , 2008, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[32]  Moya Kneafsey,et al.  Common ground? Motivations for participation in a community-supported agriculture scheme , 2008 .

[33]  Ray Collins,et al.  From serendipity to sustainable competitive advantage: insights from Houston's Farm and their journey of co‐innovation , 2007 .

[34]  K. Brandon Lang,et al.  Expanding Our Understanding of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA): An Examination of Member Satisfaction , 2005 .

[35]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The ''Identified Victim'' Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual? , 2005 .

[36]  T. Marsden,et al.  Understanding Alternative Food Networks: Exploring the Role of Short Food Supply Chains in Rural Development , 2003 .

[37]  S. Stagl.  Local Organic Food Markets: Potentials and Limitations for Contributing to Sustainable Development , 2002 .

[38]  Carol Goland.  Community Supported Agriculture, Food Consumption Patterns, and Member Commitment , 2002 .

[39]  C. Hinrichs,et al.  Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market☆ , 2000 .

[40]  L. B. Delind.  Close encounters with a CSA: The reflections of a bruised and somewhat wiser anthropologist , 1999, Autobiographical Writing Across the Disciplines.

[41]  D. Lass,et al.  Consumer Benefits from Community Supported Agriculture Membership , 1998 .

[42]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect , 1997 .

[43]  Jane Kolodinsky,et al.  Factors influencing the decision to join a community supported agriculture (CSA) farm , 1997 .

[44]  William Lane Austin,et al.  The Census of Agriculture , 1930 .

[45]  A. Ammerman,et al.  Examining the Influence of price and accessibility on willingness to shop at farmers' markets among low-income eastern North Carolina women. , 2014, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[46]  Douglas H. Constance,et al.  SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES: GETTING BEYOND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND INTO FOOD SYSTEMS * , 2008 .

[47]  M. Pollan.  Book Reviews , 2007 .

[48]  K. Coyne.  Sustainable competitive advantage--What it is, what it isn't , 1986 .