Role of inferior temporal neurons in visual memory. II. Multiplying temporal waveforms related to vision and memory.

1. In the companion paper we reported on the activity of neurons in the inferior temporal (IT) cortex during a sequential pattern matching task. In this task a sample stimulus was followed by a test stimulus that was either a match or a nonmatch. Many of the neurons encoded information about the patterns of both current and previous stimuli in the temporal modulation of their responses. 2. A simple information processing model of visual memory can be formed with just four steps: 1) encode the current stimulus; 2) recall the code of a remembered stimulus; 3) compare the two codes; 4) and decide whether they are similar or different. The analysis presented in the first paper suggested that some IT neurons were performing the comparison step of visual memory. 3. We propose that IT neurons participate in the comparison of temporal waveforms related to vision and memory by multiplying them together. This product could form the basis of a crosscorrelation-based comparison. 4. We tested our hypothesis by fitting a simple multiplicative model to data from IT neurons. The model generated waveforms in separate memory and visual channels. The waveforms arising from the two channels were then multiplied on a point by point basis to yield the output waveform. The model was fitted to the actual neuronal data by a gradient descent method to find the best fit waveforms that also had the lowest total energy. 5. The multiplicative model fit the neuronal responses quite well. The multiplicative model made consistently better predictions of the actual response waveforms than did an additive model. Furthermore, the fit was better when the actual relationship between the responses and the sample and test stimuli were preserved than when that relationship was randomized. 6. We infer from the superior fit of the multiplicative model that IT neurons are multiplying temporally modulated waveforms arising from separate visual and memory systems in the comparison step of visual memory.

[1]  D. Amaral,et al.  The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: II. Cortical afferents , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  R. Desimone,et al.  Prestriate afferents to inferior temporal cortex: an HRP study , 1980, Brain Research.

[3]  J M Fuster,et al.  Neuronal firing in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey in a visual memory task , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Activity of inferior temporal neurons in behaving monkeys , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[6]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neuronal correlate of pictorial short-term memory in the primate temporal cortexYasushi Miyashita , 1988, Nature.

[7]  M. Yukie,et al.  Amygdalofugal and amygdalopetal connections with modality‐specific visual cortical areas in macaques (macaca fuscata, M. mulatta, and M. fascicularis) , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[9]  N. Daw,et al.  The effect of varying stimulus intensity on NMDA-receptor activity in cat visual cortex. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  Product Units: A Computationally Powerful and Biologically Plausible Extension to Backpropagation Networks , 1989, Neural Computation.

[11]  GrossbergS. Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding , 1976 .

[12]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[13]  M. Yukie,et al.  Amygdalar connections with middle and inferior temporal gyri of the monkey , 1987, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  M Mishkin,et al.  Organization of the amygdalopetal projections from modality‐specific cortical association areas in the monkey , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  Deepak N. Pandya,et al.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. II. Frontal lobe afferents , 1975, Brain Research.

[16]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  The ART of adaptive pattern recognition by a self-organizing neural network , 1988, Computer.

[17]  Deepak N. Pandya,et al.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. III. Efferent connections , 1975, Brain Research.

[18]  L Maffei,et al.  Patterns in the discharge of simple and complex visual cortical cells , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[19]  H. Sakai,et al.  Enhancement of inferior temporal neurons during visual discrimination. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  L. Optican,et al.  Lateral geniculate neurons in behaving primates. II. Encoding of visual information in the temporal shape of the response. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Connections of inferior temporal areas TE and TEO with medial temporal- lobe structures in infant and adult monkeys , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Cortical Visual Areas and Their Interactions , 1972 .

[23]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Temporal encoding of two-dimensional patterns by single units in primate primary visual cortex. I. Stimulus-response relations. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  T. Bliss,et al.  NMDA receptors - their role in long-term potentiation , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[27]  B J Richmond,et al.  Temporal encoding of two-dimensional patterns by single units in primate primary visual cortex. II. Information transmission. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  D. Amaral,et al.  Amygdalo‐cortical projections in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis) , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  R. E. Passingham,et al.  Cortical and subcortical afferents to the amygdala of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) , 1980, Brain Research.

[30]  I. Riches,et al.  The effects of visual stimulation and memory on neurons of the hippocampal formation and the neighboring parahippocampal gyrus and inferior temporal cortex of the primate , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Mishkin A memory system in the monkey. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  A. Mikami,et al.  Inferotemporal neuron activities and color discrimination with delay , 1980, Brain Research.

[33]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Storage and Processing of Information in Distributed Associative Memory Systems , 1981 .

[34]  R. Desimone,et al.  A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. , 1991, Science.

[35]  J. Fuster,et al.  Inferotemporal neurons distinguish and retain behaviorally relevant features of visual stimuli. , 1981, Science.