Sensory feedback in the learning of a novel motor task.

The role of different forms of feedback is examined in learning a novel motor task. Five groups of ten subjects had to learn the voluntary control of the abduction of the big toe, each under a different feedback condition (proprioceptive feedback, visual feedback, EMG feedback, tactile feedback, force feedback). The task was selected for two reasons. First, in most motor learning studies subjects have to perform simple movements which present hardly any learning problem. Second, studying the learning of a new movement an provide useful information for neuromuscular reeducation, where patients often also have to learn movements for which no control strategy exists. The results show that artificial sensory feedback (EMG feedback, force feedback) is more powerful than "natural" (proprioceptive, visual, and tactile) feedback. The implications of these results for neuromuscular reeducation are discussed.

[1]  H. Devries,et al.  "Efficiency of electrical activity" as a physiological measure of the functional state of muscle tissue. , 1968, American journal of physical medicine.

[2]  S. Keele,et al.  The Structure of Motor Programs , 1976 .

[3]  C. Riper,et al.  Differential transfer of training in a rotary activity , 1939 .

[4]  A. Marinacci,et al.  Electromyogram in neuromuscular re-education. , 1960, Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society.

[5]  D. Ludwig.  EMG changes during acquisition of a motor skill. , 1982, American journal of physical medicine.

[6]  R. Schmidt.  A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[7]  T. Mulder,et al.  Sensory feedback therapy and theoretical knowledge of motor control and learning. , 1984, American journal of physical medicine.

[8]  D. Glencross.  34 Levels and Strategies of Response Organization , 1980 .

[9]  J. Basmajian,et al.  Standardization of methods in single motor unit training. , 1973, American journal of physical medicine.

[10]  Gerard van Galen,et al.  6 – The Sequencing of Movements , 1984 .

[11]  James J. Gibson,et al.  Bilateral transfer of the conditioned knee-jerk , 1935 .

[12]  J. Inglis,et al.  Electromyographic biofeedback and neuromuscular rehabilitation. , 1976 .

[13]  Booker He,et al.  Simplified feedback in neuromuscular retraining: an automated approach using electromyographic signals. , 1969 .

[14]  S. Middaugh.  EMG feedback as a muscle reeducation technique: a controlled study. , 1978, Physical therapy.

[15]  J. Basmajian,et al.  Biofeedback in physical medicine and rehabilitation , 1978, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[16]  T. Mulder,et al.  The effects of fatigue and task repetition on the surface electromyographic signal. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Basmajian Jv.  Control of individual motor units. , 1967 .

[18]  J. Adams.  Issues for a Closed-Loop Theory of Motor Learning , 1976 .

[19]  T. W. Cook.  Studies in cross education. I. Mirror tracing the star-shaped maze. , 1933 .

[20]  J. V. Basmajian,et al.  Control and Training of Individual Motor Units , 1963, Science.

[21]  Gottlieb Gl,et al.  Filtering of electromyographic signals. , 1970 .

[22]  O. A. Mortensen,et al.  Identification and voluntary control of single motor unit activity in the tibialis anterior muscle , 1962, The Anatomical record.

[23]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  S L Wolf,et al.  Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients. A critical review. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[25]  D J Povel,et al.  Development of a vowel corrector for the deaf , 1974, Psychological research.

[26]  James J. Gibson,et al.  Bilateral transfer of the conditioned response in the human subject. , 1932 .

[27]  H. Whiting.  33 Dimensions of Control in Motor Learning , 1980 .

[28]  G. Wannstedt,et al.  Use of augmented sensory feedback to achieve symmetrical standing. , 1978, Physical therapy.

[29]  V. T. Inman,et al.  PHASIC ACTIVITY OF INTRINSIC MUSCLES OF THE FOOT. , 1964, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  D. Rosenbaum.  Selective adaptation of “command neurons” in the human motor system , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  E A Roy,et al.  Mechanisms of control in motor performance: closed-loop versus motor programming control. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .