Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: An event-related functional MRI study

Inhibiting inappropriate behavior and thoughts is an essential ability for humans, but the regions responsible for inhibitory processing are a matter of continuous debate. This is the first study of somatosensory go/nogo tasks using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Fifteen subjects preformed two different types of go/nogo task, i.e. (1) Movement and (2) Count, to compare with previous studies using visual go/nogo tasks, and confirm whether the inhibitory processing is dependent on sensory modalities. Go and nogo stimuli were presented with an even probability. Our data indicated that the response inhibition network involved the dorsolateral (DLPFC) and ventrolateral (VLPFC) prefrontal cortices, pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), inferior parietal lobule (IPL), insula, and temporoparietal junction (TPJ), which were consistent with previous results obtained using visual go/nogo tasks. These activities existed in both Movement and Count Nogo trials. Therefore, our results suggest that the network for inhibitory processing is not dependent on sensory modalities but reflects common neural activities. In addition, there were differences of activation intensity between Movement and Count Nogo trials in the prefrontal cortex, temporal lobe, and ACC. Thus, inhibitory processing would involve two neural networks, common and uncommon regions, depending on the required response mode.

[1]  B. Postle,et al.  Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: evidence from event-related fMRI studies , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Koji Inui,et al.  Somato‐motor inhibitory processing in humans: a study with MEG and ERP , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[3]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[5]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  H G Vaughan,et al.  The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual Go/NoGo tasks. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[8]  T. Braver,et al.  Sensitivity of prefrontal cortex to changes in target probability: A functional MRI study , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Frans W. Cornelissen,et al.  Evidence of enhancement of spatial attention during inhibition of a visuo-motor response , 2003, NeuroImage.

[10]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  A comparison of label‐based review and ALE meta‐analysis in the Stroop task , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  No‐go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[14]  M Honda,et al.  Activities of the Primary and Supplementary Motor Areas Increase in Preparation and Execution of Voluntary Muscle Relaxation: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Hisae Gemba,et al.  Potential related to no-go reaction of go/no-go hand movement task with color discrimination in human , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  D. Pandya,et al.  Comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human and the macaque ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and corticocortical connection patterns in the monkey , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  The human prefrontal and parietal association cortices are involved in NO-GO performances—an event-related fMRI study , 2000, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Petrides,et al.  Differential activation of the human orbital, mid-ventrolateral, and mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the processing of visual stimuli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Jun Tanji,et al.  Role for supplementary motor area cells in planning several movements ahead , 1994, Nature.

[21]  J. Pekar,et al.  fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task-dependent. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  Bart Rypma,et al.  Prefrontal modulation of working memory performance in brain injury and disease , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[23]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Prefrontal‐subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event‐related fMRI , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  Dae-Shik Kim,et al.  Diffusion tensor studies dissociated two fronto-temporal pathways in the human memory system , 2007, NeuroImage.

[25]  C Andrew,et al.  Motor response suppression and the prepotent tendency to respond: a parametric fMRI study , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  O. Gruber,et al.  Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: A comparative fMRI study on selective attention , 2006, Brain Research.

[28]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  H. Garavan,et al.  Dissociable Executive Functions in the Dynamic Control of Behavior: Inhibition, Error Detection, and Correction , 2002, NeuroImage.

[30]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[31]  R. Elliott,et al.  Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  B. Kopp,et al.  N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Event‐related fMRI study of response inhibition , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[36]  M Spitzer,et al.  The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: evidence from event‐related potentials in a go/no go task , 1998, Neuroreport.

[37]  Koji Inui,et al.  Effects of a go/nogo task on event-related potentials following somatosensory stimulation , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Immature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children Evidence from fMRI , 2002, Neuron.

[40]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[41]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[42]  Klaus Opwis,et al.  Tracking the subprocesses of decision-based action in the human frontal lobes , 2006, NeuroImage.

[44]  M. Chee,et al.  The Neural Basis of Interindividual Variability in Inhibitory Efficiency after Sleep Deprivation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  M. Bellgrove,et al.  The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks , 2001, NeuroImage.

[47]  Henrik Walter,et al.  Differential activation of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex during working memory retrieval , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  A Developmental Functional MRI Study of Prefrontal Activation during Performance of a Go-No-Go Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[50]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroanatomy of Single-Word Reading: Method and Validation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[51]  John J. Foxe,et al.  A topography of executive functions and their interactions revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[52]  Koji Jimura,et al.  Activation of Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus during Response Inhibition across Response Modalities , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  A M Owen Memory: Dissociating multiple memory processes , 1998, Current Biology.

[54]  Y. Okamoto,et al.  Negative correlation between right prefrontal activity during response inhibition and impulsiveness: A fMRI study , 2004, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.

[55]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[56]  M. Hallett,et al.  Mesial motor areas in self-initiated versus externally triggered movements examined with fMRI: effect of movement type and rate. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[57]  A. Kok Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks , 1986, Biological Psychology.

[58]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Functional anatomy of GO/NO-GO discrimination and response selection — a PET study in man , 1996, Brain Research.

[60]  J. Ford,et al.  ERPs to response production and inhibition. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.