Securing Power System State Estimation

In power system, state estimation is the basis of protecting and controlling the power grid. However, attackers can interfere the normal state estimating processes by strategically altering certain measurements through false data injection (FDI) attack. To address this problem, a typical solution is deploying a large amount of phasor measurement units (PMUs) at substations with necessary protection. However, the high expenses has limited the large-scale deployment of PMUs in reality. In this paper we present a methodology to ensure the power system state estimation through assessing risks and further providing protection schemes considering constrains of the grid operator. Firstly, we propose a risk assessment model composed of quantifying the importance-level of substations and computing the attack cost under a given security strategy. Furthermore, based on the model we introduce an optimal countermeasure synthesis approach which maximizes the attack cost and protects the most important substations. Simulations on standard IEEE test cases demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of our framework. Our results indicate that protecting a small number of strategically chosen substations can significantly enhance the system security towards FDI attacks.

[1]  A. Abur,et al.  Observability analysis and measurement placement for systems with PMUs , 2004, IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, 2004..

[2]  Hamed Mohsenian Rad,et al.  False data injection attacks with incomplete information against smart power grids , 2012, 2012 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[3]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Strategic Protection Against Data Injection Attacks on Power Grids , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[4]  M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad,et al.  Observability enhancement by optimal PMU placement considering random power system outages , 2011 .

[5]  Peng Ning,et al.  False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids , 2011, TSEC.

[6]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  Cyber security analysis of state estimators in electric power systems , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[7]  A. G. Expósito,et al.  Power system state estimation : theory and implementation , 2004 .

[8]  Béla Genge,et al.  A system dynamics approach for assessing the impact of cyber attacks on critical infrastructures , 2015, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[9]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Contingency-Constrained PMU Placement in Power Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Henrik Sandberg,et al.  Network-layer protection schemes against stealth attacks on state estimators in power systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[11]  L. Tong,et al.  Malicious Data Attacks on Smart Grid State Estimation: Attack Strategies and Countermeasures , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[12]  Thomas J. Overbye,et al.  Topology Perturbation for Detecting Malicious Data Injection , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  Klara Nahrstedt,et al.  Detecting False Data Injection Attacks on DC State Estimation , 2010 .

[14]  Ehab Al-Shaer,et al.  Security Threat Analytics and Countermeasure Synthesis for Power System State Estimation , 2014, 2014 44th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks.

[15]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Lenwood S. Heath,et al.  The PMU Placement Problem , 2005, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[17]  Deepa Kundur,et al.  Towards a Framework for Cyber Attack Impact Analysis of the Electric Smart Grid , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[18]  Ali Abur,et al.  On the use of PMUs in power system state estimation , 2011 .