Knowledge Sharing in Workplace: Motivators and Demotivators

This paper gives an overview of knowledge sharing in workplace. Based on the review of critical literatures by the authors, they infer that knowledge sharing in workplace can be influenced by motivators and demotivators. Activities of knowledge sharing in organizations may be on organization level or individual level. Knowledge sharing of both levels is critical to the success or failure of knowledge management inside and outside of organizations. Age, culture, and industry were all found to affect knowledge sharing among workers. A common stereotype is that older workers hoard knowledge because they are more insecure and feel threatened by younger workers. Since older workers have more valuable knowledge, younger workers needed to entice their older colleagues to share their valuable knowledge with them. The paper focus on motivators and demotivators to sharing Knowledge in workplace. Theories and research pertaining to why workers share knowledge are reviewed. While all industry need knowledge and innovation, it is also true that the pace of change and the need to innovate differs from industry to industry. Technology was acknowledged to have a high important role in increasing productivity of knowledge sharing. It plays a critical role in creating, storing and distributing explicit knowledge in an accessible and expeditious

[1]  Roger Bennett,et al.  “Ba” as a determinant of salesforce effectiveness: an empirical assessment of the applicability of the Nonaka‐Takeuchi model to the management of the selling function , 2001 .

[2]  F. Herzberg One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees? , 2008 .

[3]  William R. King Playing an Integral Role in Knowledge Management , 2000, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[4]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Knowing "What" to Do Is Not Enough: Turning Knowledge into Action , 1999 .

[5]  M. Tampoe Motivating Knowledge Workers—The Challenge for the 1990s , 1993 .

[6]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Culturally-induced information impactedness: a prescription for failure in software ventures , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process , 2003 .

[8]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  Knowledge Management: A Threefold Framework , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[9]  Ronald J. Recardo,et al.  Organizational Culture and Teams , 1997 .

[10]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Knowledge Emergence: Social, Technical, and Evolutionary Dimensions of Knowledge Creation , 2001 .

[11]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[12]  I. Nonaka,et al.  BUILDING A FOUNDATION FOR KNOWLEDGE CREATION , 1998 .

[13]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances , 2006 .

[14]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Theory of the Knowledge-Creating Firm: Subjectivity, Objectivity and Synthesis , 2005 .

[15]  Ragna Seidler-de Alwis,et al.  The use of tacit knowledge within innovative companies: knowledge management in innovative enterprises , 2008, J. Knowl. Manag..

[16]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[17]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[18]  Josune Sáenz,et al.  Knowledge sharing and innovation performance , 2009 .

[19]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[20]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing , 1999 .

[21]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[22]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[23]  Robert Sharkie,et al.  Precariousness under the new psychological contract: the effect on trust and the willingness to converse and share knowledge , 2005 .

[24]  Vincent M. Ribière,et al.  Expertise and Mistakes, to Share or Not to Share? A Cross Cultural Study of In-Group /Out-Group Relationships on Knowledge Sharing , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  Kristian Kreiner,et al.  Tacit knowledge management: the role of artifacts , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  V. Vroom Work and motivation , 1964 .

[27]  P. Drucker,et al.  Beyond the information revolution , 1999 .

[28]  S. Mann Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations , 1999 .

[29]  M. Drolet,et al.  Better jobs in the new economy , 2002 .

[30]  Dick Stenmark,et al.  Turning tacit knowledge tangible , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[31]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Managing corporate culture through reward systems , 1987 .

[32]  Robert A. Eckhoff,et al.  David against Goliath? Group size and bystander effects in virtual knowledge sharing , 2008 .

[33]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Knowing “What” to do is not Enough: Turning Knowledge into Action , 1999 .

[34]  D. Ferrin,et al.  The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings , 2001 .

[35]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Knowledge management and global cultures: elucidation through an institutional knowledge‐flow perspective , 2007 .

[37]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment , 1997 .

[38]  P. Drucker Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[39]  Peter Meso,et al.  A resource-based view of organizational knowledge management systems , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[40]  A. Maslow A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[41]  T. Goh Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organisation , 2000 .

[42]  J. C. Shih,et al.  Notice of RetractionKnowledge Acquisition, Sharing Intention, and Sharing Behavior , 2010, 2010 International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning.

[43]  Alexander Ardichvili,et al.  Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[44]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  Knowledge emergence : social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation , 2001 .

[45]  Meng Li,et al.  Why Nonaka highlights tacit knowledge: a critical review , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[46]  A. D. Amar,et al.  Motivating knowledge workers to innovate: a model integrating motivation dynamics and antecedents , 2004 .

[47]  Sree Nilakanta,et al.  Organizational Memory Management: Technological and Research Issues , 2006, J. Database Manag..

[48]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[49]  John F. Kikoski,et al.  The Inquiring Organization , 2004 .

[50]  R. McCrae,et al.  Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture , 2004 .

[51]  Phil Beaumont,et al.  Knowledge management practice in Scottish law firms , 2002 .

[52]  Mazleena Salleh,et al.  CHALLENGES OF E-LEARING IN NIGERIAN UNIVERSITY EDUCATION BASED ON THE EXPERIENCE OF DEVELOPED COUNTRIES , 2011 .

[53]  N. Cheng Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Broker of Organizations , 2009, 2009 Second International Conference on Future Information Technology and Management Engineering.