Influence of operator- and patient-dependent variables on the suitability of automated quantitative coronary arteriography for routine clinical use.
暂无分享,去创建一个
S E Nissen | A. DeMaria | S. Nissen | D. Booth | A N DeMaria | J C Gurley | D C Booth | J. Gurley
[1] D Revel,et al. [Automatic quantitative analysis of vascular stenosis. Experimental study of a digital angiography system applied to cardiology]. , 1989, Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux.
[2] C. J. Kooijman,et al. Variabilities in measurement of coronary arterial dimensions resulting from variations in cineframe selection. , 1988, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[3] R. Vogel,et al. Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: implications for clinical decisions. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[4] G W Hamilton,et al. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.
[5] R. Dinsmore,et al. Interobserver Variability in Coronary Angiography , 1976, Circulation.
[6] K. Gould,et al. Quantification of coronary artery stenosis in vivo. , 1985, Circulation research.
[7] W. Roberts,et al. Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings. , 1979, Annals of internal medicine.
[8] P D Esser,et al. Quantification of relative coronary arterial stenosis by cinevideodensitometric analysis of coronary arteriograms. , 1984, Circulation.
[9] M. LeFree,et al. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. , 1987, Circulation.
[10] C. White,et al. Comparison by quantitative angiographic assessment of coronary stenoses of one view showing the severest narrowing to two orthogonal views. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.
[11] O Nalcioglu,et al. Videodensitometric determination of minimum coronary artery luminal diameter before and after angioplasty. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.
[12] S. Paulin,et al. Computerized image analysis for quantitative measurement of vessel diameter from cineangiograms. , 1983, Circulation.
[13] J. J. Gerbrands,et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.
[14] L. Klein,et al. Quantification of absolute luminal diameter by computer-analyzed digital subtraction angiography: an assessment in human coronary arteries. , 1988, Circulation.
[15] B Meier,et al. Assessment of stenoses in coronary angioplasty. Inter- and intraobserver variability. , 1983, International journal of cardiology.
[16] M. Stadius,et al. Coronary artery revascularization. Critical need for, and consequences of, objective angiographic assessment of lesion severity. , 1990, Circulation.
[17] D. Hackel,et al. Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.
[18] T. Takaro,et al. Observer Agreement in Evaluating Coronary Angiograms , 1975, Circulation.
[19] S H Brooks,et al. Reproducibility of a consensus panel in the interpretation of coronary angiograms. , 1978, American heart journal.
[20] E. Bolson,et al. Quantitative Coronary Arteriography: Estimation of Dimensions, Hemodynamic Resistance, and Atheroma Mass of Coronary Artery Lesions Using the Arteriogram and Digital Computation , 1977, Circulation.
[21] K. Lipscomb,et al. Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.
[22] J A Seibert,et al. Videodensitometric quantitation of stenosis: in vitro and in vivo validation. , 1985, Radiology.
[23] I C Cooper,et al. Assessment of coronary angioplasty by an automated digital angiographic method. , 1988, American heart journal.
[24] M. Sanmarco,et al. Computerized edge tracking and lesion measurement in coronary angiograms. A pilot study comparing smokers with non-smokers. , 1984, Atherosclerosis.
[25] W. C. Elliott,et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Selective Coronary Cinearteriography , 1967, Circulation.
[26] C M Grondin,et al. Discrepancies Between Cineangiographic and Postmortem Findings in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Recent Myocardial Revascularization , 1974, Circulation.
[27] J. Murray,et al. Variability in the Analysis of Coronary Arteriograms , 1977, Circulation.
[28] J E Edwards,et al. Correlation of the Antemortem Coronary Arteriogram and the Postmortem Specimen , 1973, Circulation.
[29] L. Klein,et al. Assessment of coronary artery stenoses by digital subtraction angiography: a pathoanatomic validation. , 1987, American heart journal.
[30] L D Fisher,et al. Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). , 1982, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[31] H J ten Katen,et al. Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.
[32] K. Gould,et al. Pressure‐Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenoses in Unsedated Dogs at Rest and during Coronary Vasodilation , 1978, Circulation research.
[33] J. J. Gerbrands,et al. Coronary Artery Dimensions from Cineangiograms-Methodology and Validation of a Computer-Assisted Analysis Procedure , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[34] E J Topol,et al. Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.
[35] E R Bates,et al. A comparison of 35 mm cine film and digital radiographic image recording: implications for quantitative coronary arteriography. Film vs. digital coronary quantification. , 1988, Investigative radiology.
[36] T. Bashore,et al. Accuracy of digital angiography for quantitation of normal coronary luminal segments in excised, perfused hearts. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.
[37] S. M. Collins,et al. Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: "a battered gold standard". , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[38] E L Bolson,et al. A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.
[39] G.B.John Mancini,et al. Comparison of 35 mm Cine Film and Digital Radiographic Image Imaging for Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1988 .
[40] T. Bashore,et al. Comparison of coronary stenosis quantitation results from on-line digital and digitized cine film images. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.
[41] A. Ross,et al. Interpretation of coronary angiograms. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[42] K. Gould,et al. Physiological Significance of Coronary Flow Velocity and Changing Stenosis Geometry during Coronary Vasodilation in Awake Dogs , 1982, Circulation research.