Background noise from a natural chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a Neotropical frog
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Rufus A. Johnstone,et al. Imperfect female choice and male mating skew on leks of different sizes , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[2] Neil A. Macmillan,et al. Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .
[3] H. Gerhardt,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF VOCALIZATION IN FROGS AND TOADS , 1994 .
[4] R. Johnstone. Honest signalling, perceptual error and the evolution of ‘all-or-nothing’ displays , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[5] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Spatially mediated release from auditory masking in an anuran amphibian , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[6] H. Gerhardt. Sound Pattern Recognition in Some North American Treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for Mate Choice , 1982 .
[7] C. Guyer,et al. Patterns of reproduction and habitat use in an assemblage of Neotropical hylid frogs , 1994, Oecologia.
[8] H. Gerhardt,et al. The neuroethology of frequency preferences in the spring peeper , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[9] David Jaarsma,et al. More on the Detection of One of M Orthogonal Signals , 1967 .
[10] R. Johnstone,et al. CONSPIRATORIAL WHISPERS AND CONSPICUOUS DISPLAYS: GAMES OF SIGNAL DETECTION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[11] K. Wells,et al. Vocal communication in a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: responses of females to advertisement and aggressive calls , 1987 .
[12] Lori Wollerman. Stabilizing and directional preferences of female Hyla ebraccata for calls differing in static properties , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[13] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Phonotaxis in Female Frogs and Toads: Execution and Design of Experiments , 1995 .
[14] R A Johnstone,et al. Efficacy and Honesty in Communication between Relatives , 1998, The American Naturalist.
[15] K. Wells. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians , 1977, Animal Behaviour.
[16] Günter Ehret,et al. Auditory masking and effects of noise on responses of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) to synthetic mating calls , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.
[17] LORI WOLLERMAN,et al. Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frogHyla ebraccata , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[18] S. Telford,et al. MATE CHOICE OCCURS ONLY IN SMALL CHORUSES OF PAINTED REED FROGS HYPEROLIUS MARMORATUS , 1989 .
[19] K. Wells,et al. Vocal communication in a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: Advertisement calls , 1984, Animal Behaviour.
[20] Don McNicol,et al. A Primer of Signal Detection Theory , 1976 .
[21] P F Judy,et al. Detection of noisy visual targets: Models for the effects of spatial uncertainty and signal-to-noise ratio , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.
[22] J A Swets,et al. Signal detection and identification at successive stages of observation , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.
[23] J. Bosch,et al. Female preference in complex acoustical environments in the midwife toads Alytes obstetricans and Alytes cisternasii , 1997 .
[24] C. Metz,et al. Visual detection and localization of radiographic images. , 1975, Radiology.
[25] R. Johnstone. Recognition and the evolution of distinctive signatures: when does it pay to reveal identity? , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[26] Peter M. Narins,et al. Chorus dynamics of a neotropical amphibian assemblage: comparison of computer simulation and natural behaviour , 1989, Animal Behaviour.
[27] R. H. Wiley. SEXUAL SELECTION AND MATE CHOICE: TRADE-OFFS FOR MALES AND FEMALES , 2000 .
[28] Michael D Greenfield,et al. Synchronous and Alternating Choruses in Insects and Anurans: Common Mechanisms and Diverse Functions , 1994 .
[29] G. Klump,et al. Masking of acoustic signals by the chorus background noise in the green tree frog: A limitation on mate choice , 1988, Animal Behaviour.