Estimating Dynamic Functional Brain Connectivity With a Sparse Hidden Markov Model

Estimating dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) of the brain from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data can reveal both spatial and temporal organization and can be applied to track the developmental trajectory of brain maturity as well as to study mental illness. Resting state fMRI (rs-fMRI) is regarded as a promising task since it reflects the spontaneous brain activity without an external stimulus. The sliding window method has been successfully used to extract dFNC but typically assumes a fixed window size. The hidden Markov model (HMM) based method is an alternative approach for estimating time-varying connectivity. In this paper, we propose a sparse HMM based on Gaussian HMM and Gaussian graphical model (GGM). In this model, the time-varying neural processes are represented as discrete brain states which are described with functional connectivity networks. By enforcing the sparsity on the precision matrix, we can get interpretable connectivity between different functional regions. The optimization of our model can be realized with the expectation maximization (EM) and graphical least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (glasso) algorithms. The proposed model is validated on both simulated blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) time series and rs-fMRI data. Results indicate that the proposed model can capture both stationary and abrupt brain activity fluctuations. We also compare dFNC patterns between children and young adults from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC) study. Both spatial and temporal behavior of the dFNC are analyzed and compared. The results provide insight into the developmental trajectory across childhood and motivate further research on brain connectivity.

[1]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Estimation of Dynamic Sparse Connectivity Patterns From Resting State fMRI , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Ranking and averaging independent component analysis by reproducibility (RAICAR) , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Tülay Adali,et al.  Comparison of multi‐subject ICA methods for analysis of fMRI data , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[4]  S. Petersen,et al.  The maturing architecture of the brain's default network , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Fused Estimation of Sparse Connectivity Patterns From Rest fMRI—Application to Comparison of Children and Adult Brains , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  J. Booth,et al.  Differences between child and adult large‐scale functional brain networks for reading tasks , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Tommi S. Jaakkola,et al.  Principal Differences Analysis: Interpretable Characterization of Differences between Distributions , 2015, NIPS.

[8]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[9]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Changes in the interaction of resting‐state neural networks from adolescence to adulthood , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Xiangchuan Chen,et al.  Spatiotemporal Modeling of Brain Dynamics Using Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Gaussian Hidden Markov Model , 2016, Brain Connect..

[11]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Evidence for Anomalous Network Connectivity during Working Memory Encoding in Schizophrenia: An ICA Based Analysis , 2009, PloS one.

[12]  Jia Li,et al.  A Distance for HMMs Based on Aggregated Wasserstein Metric and State Registration , 2016, ECCV.

[13]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  V. Calhoun,et al.  The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.

[15]  Hao He,et al.  Artifact removal in the context of group ICA: A comparison of single‐subject and group approaches , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[16]  D. Hu,et al.  Predicting individual brain maturity using dynamic functional connectivity , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  S. Whitfield-Gabrieli,et al.  Dynamic Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Major Depression , 2016, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[18]  Miao Pan,et al.  Abnormal Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity and Graph Theoretical Analysis in Major Depressive Disorder , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[19]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Interrater and intermethod reliability of default mode network selection , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[21]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[22]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Discovering dynamic brain networks from big data in rest and task , 2017, NeuroImage.

[23]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast transient networks in spontaneous human brain activity , 2014, eLife.

[24]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[26]  Albert Dahan,et al.  Effects of morphine and alcohol on functional brain connectivity during “resting state”:A placebo‐controlled crossover study in healthy young men , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[27]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Multisubject Independent Component Analysis of fMRI: A Decade of Intrinsic Networks, Default Mode, and Neurodiagnostic Discovery , 2012, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[29]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[30]  Ning Ma,et al.  Addiction related alteration in resting-state brain connectivity , 2010, NeuroImage.

[31]  Jorma Rissanen,et al.  The Minimum Description Length Principle in Coding and Modeling , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[32]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Multimodal Classification of Schizophrenia Patients with MEG and fMRI Data Using Static and Dynamic Connectivity Measures , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[33]  S. Petersen,et al.  Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: A publicly available resource for the study of normal and abnormal brain development in youth , 2016, NeuroImage.

[35]  Kaustubh Supekar,et al.  Development of Large-Scale Functional Brain Networks in Children , 2009, NeuroImage.

[36]  V. Calhoun,et al.  A Review of Challenges in the Use of fMRI for Disease Classification / Characterization and A Projection Pursuit Application from A Multi-site fMRI Schizophrenia Study , 2008, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[37]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Resting‐state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[38]  A. Belger,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[39]  Yuhui Du,et al.  Group information guided ICA for fMRI data analysis , 2013, NeuroImage.

[40]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Kent A. Kiehl,et al.  A method for evaluating dynamic functional network connectivity and task-modulation: application to schizophrenia , 2010, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[42]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Functional Brain Networks Develop from a “Local to Distributed” Organization , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[43]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[44]  Jr. G. Forney,et al.  Viterbi Algorithm , 1973, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[45]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[46]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  SimTB, a simulation toolbox for fMRI data under a model of spatiotemporal separability , 2012, NeuroImage.

[47]  Yong He,et al.  BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics , 2013, PloS one.

[48]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[49]  C. Givens,et al.  A class of Wasserstein metrics for probability distributions. , 1984 .

[50]  Sach Mukherjee,et al.  Penalized estimation in high-dimensional hidden Markov models with state-specific graphical models , 2012, 1208.4989.

[51]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Functional Network Dynamics in Resting State fMRI , 2013, IPMI.

[52]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Changing brain connectivity dynamics: From early childhood to adulthood , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[53]  J. Morton,et al.  Tracking the Brain's Functional Coupling Dynamics over Development , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Understanding Protein Dynamics with L1-Regularized Reversible Hidden Markov Models , 2014, ICML.

[55]  Vince D Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic connectivity and the effects of maturation in youth with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder , 2018, Network Neuroscience.

[56]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls , 2017, NeuroImage.

[57]  José M. N. Leitão,et al.  On Fitting Mixture Models , 1999, EMMCVPR.