Exploring the Capability of ALOS PALSAR L-Band Fully Polarimetric Data for Land Cover Classification in Tropical Environments

Among different applications using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data, land cover classification of rain forest areas has been investigated. Previous results showed that L-band is more appropriate for such applications. However, SAR images have limited discriminability for mapping large sets of classes compared with optical imagery. The objective of this study was to carry out an analysis about the discriminative capability of an L-band fully polarimetric SAR complex image, compared to the possible subsets of polarizations in amplitude/intensity, for mapping land cover classes in Amazon regions. Two case studies using ALOS PALSAR L-band fully polarimetric images over Brazilian Amazon regions were considered. Several thematic classes, organized into scenarios, were considered for each case study. These scenarios represent distinct classification tasks with variated complexities. Performing a simultaneous analysis of different scenarios is a distinct way to assess the discriminative capability offered by a particular image. A methodology to organize thematic classes into scenarios is proposed in this study. The maximum likelihood classifier (MLC), with specific distributions for SAR data, and support vector machine were considered in this study. The iterated conditional modes algorithm was adopted to incorporate the contextual information in both methods. Considering a kappa coefficient equal to 0.8 as an acceptable minimum, the experiments show that none subset of polarization or fully polarimetric image allows performing discrimination between forest and regeneration types; single-polarized HV data provide acceptable results when the classification problem deals with the discrimination of a few classes; depending on the classification scenario, the dual-polarized HH+HV image produces similar results when compared to multipolarized (i.e., HH+HV+VV) data; in turn, if the MLC method is adopted, multipolarized data may produce close or statistically indifferent classification results compared to those produced with the use of fully polarimetric data.

[1]  João Roberto dos Santos,et al.  Land Use and Land Cover Mapping in the Brazilian Amazon Using Polarimetric Airborne P-Band SAR Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Luciano Vieira Dutra,et al.  Carbon budget estimation in Central Amazonia: Successional forest modeling from remote sensing data , 2005 .

[3]  Lijuan Liu,et al.  A survey of remote sensing-based aboveground biomass estimation methods in forest ecosystems , 2016, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[4]  João Roberto dos Santos,et al.  Mapping recent deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon using simulated L‐band MAPSAR images , 2008 .

[5]  Thierry Ranchin,et al.  Study Of ICM parameters influence on image satellite contextual classification , 2002 .

[6]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[7]  K. Ranson,et al.  K-distribution for multi-look processed polarimetric SAR imagery , 1994, Proceedings of IGARSS '94 - 1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[8]  Corina da Costa Freitas,et al.  Classifying Multifrequency Fully Polarimetric Imagery With Multiple Sources of Statistical Evidence and Contextual Information , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Dirk H. Hoekman,et al.  Land cover type and biomass classification using AirSAR data for evaluation of monitoring scenarios in the Colombian Amazon , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  Y. S. Rao,et al.  Classification Accuracy of Multi-Frequency and Multi-Polarization SAR Images for Various Land Covers , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[11]  J. Besag On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures , 1986 .

[12]  Luciano Vieira Dutra,et al.  A comparative analysis of ALOS PALSAR L-band and RADARSAT-2 C-band data for land-cover classification in a tropical moist region , 2012 .

[13]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[14]  João Roberto dos Santos,et al.  MODELING SPATIAL TREE PATTERNS IN THE TAPAJÓS FOREST USING INTERFEROMETRIC HEIGHT , 2009, Revista Brasileira de Cartografia.

[15]  Alejandro C. Frery,et al.  Statistical characterization of SAR data: The multiplicative model and extensions , 1995 .

[16]  Luciano Vieira Dutra,et al.  A Comparison of Multisensor Integration Methods for Land Cover Classification in the Brazilian Amazon , 2011 .

[17]  Luciano Vieira Dutra,et al.  Land use/cover classification in the Brazilian Amazon using satellite images. , 2012, Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira.

[18]  Corina da Costa Freitas,et al.  A model for extremely heterogeneous clutter , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  Francesca Bovolo,et al.  A Context-Sensitive Technique Based on Support Vector Machines for Image Classification , 2005, PReMI.

[20]  Guo Huadong,et al.  Digital Earth and Future Earth , 2016 .

[21]  Wenjun Zhang,et al.  Constructing DEM Based on InSAR and the Relationship between InSAR DEM's Precision and Terrain Factors , 2012 .

[22]  Xia Li,et al.  A three-component method for timely detection of land cover changes using polarimetric SAR images , 2015 .

[23]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Statistical analysis and segmentation of multi-look SAR imagery using partial polarimetric data , 1995, 1995 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS '95. Quantitative Remote Sensing for Science and Applications.

[24]  Sidnei J. S. Sant'Anna,et al.  Classification of Segments in PolSAR Imagery by Minimum Stochastic Distances Between Wishart Distributions , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[25]  S.J.S. Sant'Anna,et al.  An innovative support vector machine based method for contextual image classification , 2014 .

[26]  J. L. Jensen,et al.  Pseudolikelihood for Exponential Family Models of Spatial Point Processes , 1991 .

[27]  K. Halligan,et al.  A Comparison of Individual Tree and Forest Plot Height Derived from Lidar and InSAR , 2009 .

[28]  Alejandro C. Frery,et al.  Stochastic distributions and the multiplicative model: Relations, properties, estimators and applications to SAR image analysis , 1995 .

[29]  Eric Pottier,et al.  An entropy based classification scheme for land applications of polarimetric SAR , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[30]  Luciano Vieira Dutra,et al.  Generation of digital elevation models by using SIR-C/X-SAR multifrequency two-pass interferometry: the Etna case study , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[31]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Intensity and phase statistics of multilook polarimetric and interferometric SAR imagery , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[32]  Hsuan-Tien Lin,et al.  A note on Platt’s probabilistic outputs for support vector machines , 2007, Machine Learning.

[33]  Luciano Vieira Dutra,et al.  Biomass estimation in a tropical wet forest using Fourier transforms of profiles from lidar or interferometric SAR , 2010 .

[34]  Luciano Vieira Dutra,et al.  Multitemporal analysis of land use/land cover JERS-1 backscatter in the Brazilian tropical rainforest , 2002 .