The Instability of Androgynous Names: The Symbolic Maintenance of Gender Boundaries

By definition, androgynous names do not serve as gender markers. Two radically different expectations about their growth are plausible: on the one hand, the rise of the feminist movement, which militates against gender distinctions, would suggest androgynous names increasing in recent decades. On the other hand, cross-cultural research indicates that first names designate gender more frequently than any other characteristic of a child or its family, suggesting a minimal increase. Examining data for all white births in Illinois in every year from 1916 through 1989 produces paradoxical results. Overall use of androgynous names is barely increasing; however, the disposition to use androgynous names has increased among parents of daughters. Analysis of the accidental ways in which androgynous names develop, their special characteristics, and their asymmetric growth patterns, leads to viewing the androgynous process as collective behavior that can be fruitfully examined through the perspective of the Schelling residential segregation model. The minimal increase in androgyny reflects a gender contamination effect that may be operating in a variety of other domains as well.

[1]  J. L. Bruning,et al.  Connotative Meanings of First Names and Nicknames on Three Dimensions , 1971 .

[2]  C. Yonge.  History of Christian Names , 1863 .

[3]  D. Massey.  American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass , 1993 .

[4]  H. Barry,et al.  Feminization of Unisex Names from 1960 to 1990 , 1993 .

[5]  A. Kolatch.  Dictionary of First Names , 1990 .

[6]  E. G. Withycombe.  Oxford Dictionary of English Christian Names , 1971 .

[7]  Barbara F. Reskin,et al.  Women and Men at Work. , 1996 .

[8]  Bobo,et al.  Prismatic Metropolis: Race and Residential Segregation in the City of the Angels , 1996, Social science research.

[9]  Gerald Jacobs,et al.  Revolving Doors: Sex Segregation and Women''s Careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press , 1989 .

[10]  I. Luckey.  : American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass , 1995 .

[11]  Christine L. Williams.  Gender Differences at Work , 1991 .

[12]  L. Bobo,et al.  Attitudes on Residential Integration: Perceived Status Differences, Mere In-Group Preference, or Racial Prejudice? , 1996 .

[13]  Patricia A. Roos,et al.  Job Queues, Gender Queues , 1990 .

[14]  S. Lieberson,et al.  Children's First Names: An Empirical Study of Social Taste , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  B. Thorne,et al.  Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School , 1993 .

[16]  M. Schlossberg.  Naming and Identity: A Cross-Cultural Study of Personal Naming Practices. , 1989 .

[17]  William Gosling,et al.  The Facts on file dictionary of first names , 1984 .

[18]  Howard Schuman,et al.  “Chocolate city, vanilla suburbs:” Will the trend toward racially separate communities continue? , 1978 .

[19]  S. Lieberson,et al.  Ethnic Patterns in American Cities. , 1963 .

[20]  Wendell Bell.  A Probability Model for the Measurement of Ecological Segregation , 1954 .

[21]  L. R. Anderson,et al.  Name ambiguity and androgyny , 1981 .

[22]  A. Rose.  Ethnic Patterns in American Cities , 1963 .

[23]  A Piece of the Pie: Blacks and White Immigrants Since 1880 , 1981 .

[24]  S. Lieberson,et al.  DISTINCTIVE AFRICAN AMERICAN NAMES: AN EXPERIMENTAL, HISTORICAL, AND LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF INNOVATION* , 1995 .

[25]  A. Rossi.  Naming Children in Middle-Class Families , 1965 .

[26]  T. Schelling.  Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .