From Design Research to Theory : Evidence of a Maturing Field

As a discipline evolves, research practices mature and begin to define the field they support. The field of design is currently undergoing this type of evolution. Design researchers are undertaking new forms of research, articulating methods and processes, and in some cases, building new theories of and about design. In this paper, we attempt to characterize the maturation of the field of design by understanding theoretical contributions of design research through interviews with design researchers. Our goal is to better understand types of design research in design researchers’ native terms, to understand how design research supports problem framing and the selection of research methods, and to understand if and how the outcomes of design research activities lead to theory construction. Through synthesis and analysis of interviews, we characterize three types of design research: research on design, research for design, and research through design. Our goal in creating these classifications of design research is to move the field forward, and better clarify the relationship between the different types of design research and the relationship between design research and design practice. A deeper understanding of existing and recognized types of design research and their application is an important step in the further refinement and development of design research and particularly design theory.

[1]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  A sustainable identity: the creativity of an everyday designer , 2009, CHI.

[2]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  The Interaction Design Research Triangle of Design Practice, Design Studies, and Design Exploration , 2008, Design Issues.

[3]  C. Dorst Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen☆ , 2008 .

[4]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  The Product Ecology: Understanding Social Product Use and Supporting Design Culture , 2008 .

[5]  A. Edmondson,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL FIT IN MANAGEMENT FIELD RESEARCH. , 2007 .

[6]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[7]  Sharon Poggenpohl,et al.  Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology , 2007 .

[8]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[9]  T. Fisher Research in art and design - an un-discipline , 2006 .

[10]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Email in personal information management , 2006, CACM.

[11]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Artful systems in the home , 2005, CHI.

[12]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  The design way , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[13]  Joep W. Frens,et al.  Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[14]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  The drift table: designing for ludic engagement , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[15]  Katja Battarbee Co-experience: understanding user experiences in interaction , 2004 .

[16]  Stephan Wensveen,et al.  From perception to experience, from affordances to irresistibles , 2003, DPPI '03.

[17]  John Millar Carroll HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science , 2003 .

[18]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  Design-oriented human-computer interaction , 2003, CHI '03.

[19]  Ken Friedman,et al.  Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods , 2003 .

[20]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Design Research and the New Learning , 2001, Design Issues.

[21]  N. Cross Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science , 2001, Design Issues.

[22]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects , 2001 .

[23]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Holding on to Reality: The Nature of Information at the Turn of the Millenium, by Albert Borgmann . University of Chicago Press, 1999 , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[24]  N. Cross Design Research: a disciplined conversation , 1999 .

[25]  Thomas Mautner,et al.  The Penguin dictionary of philosophy , 1999 .

[26]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.

[27]  Douglas C. Schmidt,et al.  Using design patterns to develop reusable object-oriented communication software , 1995, CACM.

[28]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[29]  E. Tufte Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[30]  K. Weick Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[31]  D. Schoen The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[32]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[33]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .