On the potential of accelerating an electrified lead vehicle to mitigate rear-end collisions

This paper analyzes the potential safety benefit from autonomous acceleration of an electrified lead vehicle to mitigate or prevent being struck from behind. Safety benefit was estimated based on the expected reduction in relative velocity at impact in combination with injury risk curves. Potential issues and safety concerns with the operation and implementation of such a system in the real world are discussed from an engineering and human factors stand point. In particular, the effect of the pre-collision acceleration in reducing whiplash injury risk due to change in head posture and reduction of crash severity is also discussed. In general, this study found that autonomously accelerating an electrified lead vehicle can mitigate and prevent rear-end collisions and significantly increase the safety benefits from existing systems such as autonomous emergency braking.

[1]  I. Olsson An in-depth study of neck injuries in rear end collisions , 1990 .

[2]  Gunter P Siegmund,et al.  Loud preimpact tones reduce the cervical multifidus muscle response during rear-end collisions: a potential method for reducing whiplash injuries. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[3]  Jonas Sjöberg,et al.  Model-Based Threat Assessment for Avoiding Arbitrary Vehicle Collisions , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  Mattias Bengtsson,et al.  Collision Warning with Full Auto Brake and Pedestrian Detection - a practical example of Automatic Emergency Braking , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  C. Tingvall,et al.  Risk of permanent medical impairment (RPMI) in road traffic accidents. , 2008, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[6]  C. Farmer,et al.  Relationship of head restraint positioning to driver neck injury in rear-end crashes. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  A. Kullgren,et al.  Risk of Permanent Medical Impairment (RPMI) in Car Crashes Correlated to Age and Gender , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[8]  Yoichi Hori,et al.  Traction control of electric vehicle based on the estimation of road surface condition-basic experimental results using the test EV "UOT Electric March" , 1997, Proceedings of Power Conversion Conference - PCC '97.

[9]  L. Jakobsson Field Analysis of AIS1 Neck Injuries in Rear-End Car Impacts-Injury Reducing Effect of WHIPS Seat , 2004 .

[10]  Gunter P Siegmund,et al.  The startle response during whiplash: a protective or harmful response? , 2012, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  Peter Rhee,et al.  Neck injuries. , 2007, Current problems in surgery.

[12]  J. Blouin,et al.  Startle responses elicited by whiplash perturbations , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Å. Nygren,et al.  Effects of Different Types of Headrests in Rear-End Collisions , 1985 .

[14]  Helmut Schittenhelm Advanced Brake Assist – Real World Effectiveness of Current Implementations and Next Generation Enlargements by Mercedes-Benz , 2013 .

[15]  O. Boström,et al.  VALIDATION OF NECK INJURY CRITERIA USING RECONSTRUCTED REAL-LIFE REAR-END CRASHES WITH RECORDED CRASH PULSES , 2003 .

[16]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[17]  Anna Carlsson Addressing Female Whiplash Injury Protection - A Step Towards 50th Percentile Female Rear Impact Occupant Models , 2012 .

[18]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  The Effects of Automatic Emergency Braking on Fatal and Serious Injuries , 2009 .

[19]  Gunter P Siegmund,et al.  What Occupant Kinematics and Neuromuscular Responses Tell Us About Whiplash Injury , 2011, Spine.

[20]  N. Yoganandan,et al.  Effect of head restraint backset on head-neck kinematics in whiplash. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  C. Tingvall,et al.  Influence of Crash Pulse Characteristics on Whiplash Associated Disorders in Rear Impacts—Crash Recording in Real Life Crashes , 2003 .

[22]  Hans Norin,et al.  NECK INJURIES IN REAR END CAR COLLISIONS. BIOMECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS TO IMPROVE HEAD RESTRAINTS , 1985 .

[23]  Sandner,et al.  The ADAC advanced emergency brake system test - a real life based approach for a better primary safety , 2013 .

[24]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  COMBINING CRASH RECORDER AND PAIRED COMPARISON TECHNIQUE: INJURY RISK FUNCTIONS IN FRONTAL AND REAR IMPACTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO NECK INJURIES , 2003 .

[25]  S. Singh,et al.  DRIVER ATTRIBUTES AND REAR-END CRASH INVOLVEMENT PROPENSITY , 2003 .

[26]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  Influence of Crash Severity on Various Whiplash Injury Symptoms: A Study Based on Real-Life Rear-End Crashes with Recorded Crash Pulses , 2005 .

[27]  H Ichikawa,et al.  Influence of seat characteristics on occupant motion in low-speed rear impacts. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Matthew Robert Justin Baldock,et al.  Vehicle improvements to reduce the number and severity of rear end crashes , 2008 .