Hybrid Process for Fabricating 3D Hierarchical Scaffolds Combining Rapid Prototyping and Electrospinning

An ideal scaffold should have good mechanical properties and provide a biologically functional implant site. A rapid prototyping system has been introduced as a good method of fabricating 3D scaffolds that mimic the structure in the human body. However, the scaffolds have strands that are too smooth and a pore size that is too large relative to the seeded cells and present unfavorable conditions for initial cell attachment. To overcome these problems, we propose a hybrid technology combining a 3D rapid prototyping system and an electrospinning process to produce a hierarchical 3D biomedical scaffold. The resulting structure consists of alternating layers of 3D-structured/microsized polymer strands and nanofiber webs. The results of cell culturing of chondrocytes indicate that this technique is a feasible new method for fabricating high quality 3D polymeric scaffolds.

[1]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  Design of porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering using a three-dimensional fiber-deposition technique. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[2]  R Langer,et al.  Tissue engineering by cell transplantation using degradable polymer substrates. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  Andreas Greiner,et al.  Nanoprocessing of polymers: applications in medicine, sensors, catalysis, photonics , 2005 .

[4]  Margam Chandrasekaran,et al.  Rapid prototyping in tissue engineering: challenges and potential. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[5]  T. Webster,et al.  Nanostructured metal coatings on polymers increase osteoblast attachment , 2007, International journal of nanomedicine.

[6]  P. Ohara,et al.  Contact guidance in vitro. A light, transmission, and scanning electron microscopic study. , 1979, Experimental cell research.

[7]  F. Bäckhed,et al.  Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[8]  N. Jaeger,et al.  Sensitivity of fibroblasts and their cytoskeletons to substratum topographies: topographic guidance and topographic compensation by micromachined grooves of different dimensions. , 1997, Experimental cell research.

[9]  F. Cui,et al.  Surface modification of polyester biomaterials for tissue engineering , 2007, Biomedical materials.

[10]  E. Sachlos,et al.  Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review: the application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2003, European cells & materials.

[11]  S. Hollister.  Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering , 2005, Nature materials.

[12]  R. Landers,et al.  Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[13]  Seeram Ramakrishna,et al.  Electrospun scaffold tailored for tissue‐specific extracellular matrix , 2006, Biotechnology journal.

[14]  E. Schönherr,et al.  Differential roles for small leucine-rich proteoglycans in bone formation. , 2003, European cells & materials.

[15]  M. Stevens,et al.  Carbon nanotube-enhanced polyurethane scaffolds fabricated by thermally induced phase separation , 2008 .

[16]  Wan Doo Kim,et al.  An applicable electrospinning process for fabricating a mechanically improved nanofiber mat , 2007 .

[17]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[18]  R. Landers,et al.  Biofunctional rapid prototyping for tissue‐engineering applications: 3D bioplotting versus 3D printing , 2004 .

[19]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.