Who is Willing to Help Robots? A User Study on Collaboration Attitude

In order to operate in human-populated environments, robots need to show reasonable behaviors and human-compatible abilities. In the so-called Symbiotic Autonomy, robots and humans help each other to overcome mutual limitations and complete their tasks. When the robot takes the initiative and asks the human for help, there is a change of perspective in the interaction, which has not yet been specifically addressed by HRI studies. In this paper, we investigate the novel scenario brought about by Symbiotic Autonomy, by addressing the factors that may influence the interaction. In particular, we introduce the “Collaboration Attitude” to evaluate how the response of users being asked by the robot for help is influenced by the context of the interaction and by what they are doing (i.e., ongoing activity). We present the results of a first study, which confirms the influence of conventional factors (i.e., proxemics) on the Collaboration Attitude, while it suggests that the context (i.e., relaxing vs. working) may not be much relevant. Then, we present a second study, carried out to better assess the influence of the activity performed by the humans in our population, when (s)he is approached by the robot, as an additional and more compelling characterization of context (i.e., standing vs. sitting). While the experimental scenario takes into account a population with distinctive characteristics (i.e., academic staff and students), the overall findings of our studies suggest that the attitude of users towards robots in the setting of Symbiotic Autonomy is influenced by factors already known to influence robot acceptance while it is not significantly affected by the context of the interaction and by the human ongoing activity.

[1]  Stefanos Nikolaidis,et al.  Efficient Model Learning from Joint-Action Demonstrations for Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  Arnout van de Rijt,et al.  The hidden gender effect in online collaboration: An experimental study of team performance under anonymity , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Initiating Interactions and Negotiating Approach: A Robotic Trash Can in the Field , 2015, AAAI Spring Symposia.

[5]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Adapting Robot Behavior for Human--Robot Interaction , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[6]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Social Roles and Baseline Proxemic Preferences for a Domestic Service Robot , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[7]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Expectation Setting and Personality Attribution in HRI , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[8]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  Symbiotic Robotic Systems: Humans, Robots, and Smart Environments , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[9]  Elena Torta,et al.  A model of the user's proximity for Bayesian inference , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[10]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  A personalized robot companion? - The role of individual differences on spatial preferences in HRI scenarios , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[12]  Andrea Maria Zanchettin,et al.  Prediction of Human Activity Patterns for Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly Tasks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[13]  Minoru Asada,et al.  Efficient human-robot collaboration: When should a robot take initiative? , 2017, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies in HRI , 2012, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[15]  Stephanie Rosenthal,et al.  Mobile Robot Planning to Seek Help with Spatially-Situated Tasks , 2012, AAAI.

[16]  Yukie Nagai,et al.  Affordance-based altruistic robotic architecture for human–robot collaboration , 2019, Adapt. Behav..

[17]  E. Hall The hidden dimension: an anthropologist examines man's use of space in public and private , 1969 .

[18]  Tiziana Catarci,et al.  Enabling Symbiotic Autonomy in Short-Term Interactions: A User Study , 2016, ICSR.

[19]  Christoph Engel,et al.  Dictator games: a meta study , 2010 .