Specifying residential retrofit packages for 30 % reductions in energy consumption in hot–humid climate zones

The purpose of this research was to demonstrate the application of energy simulation as an effective tool for specifying cost-effective residential retrofit packages that will reduce energy consumption by 30 %. Single-family homes in the hot–humid climate type of the Southeastern USA were used to demonstrate the application. US census data from both state and federal studies were used to create 12 computer simulation homes representing the most common characteristics of single-family houses specific to this area. Well-recognized energy efficiency measures (EEMs) were simulated to determine their cumulative energy reduction potential. Detailed cost estimates were created for cost-to-benefit analysis. For each of the 12 simulated homes, 4 packages of EEMs were created. The four packages provided home owners options for reducing their energy by 30 % along with the estimated up-front cost and simple payback periods. The simple payback period was used to determine how cost-effective a measure was. The packages are specific to a geographic area to provide a higher degree of confidence in the projected cost and energy savings. The study provides a generic methodology to create a similar 30 % energy reduction packages for other locations and a detailed description of a case study to serve as an example. The study also highlights the value that computer simulation models can have to develop energy efficiency packages cost-effectively and specific to home owner’s location and housing type.

[2]  Philip Fairey,et al.  Updated Miscellaneous Electricity Loads and Appliance Energy Usage Profiles for Use in Home Energy Ratings, the Building America Benchmark Procedures and Related Calculations. Revised , 2011 .

[3]  M. Eastment,et al.  Development of an Energy-Savings Calculation Methodology for Residential Miscellaneous Electric Loads , 2006 .

[4]  Giuliano Dall'O',et al.  A methodology for evaluating the potential energy savings of retrofitting residential building stocks , 2012 .

[5]  Niccolò Aste,et al.  Energy retrofit of commercial buildings: case study and applied methodology , 2013 .

[6]  Greg Barker,et al.  BEopt: Software for Identifying Optimal Building America Designs on the Path to Zero Net Energy , 2005 .

[7]  Giuliano Dall'O',et al.  A methodology for the energy performance classification of residential building stock on an urban scale , 2012 .

[8]  Paul R. Hill A method of computing the transient temperature of thick walls from arbitrary variation of adiabatic-wall temperature and heat-transfer coefficient , 1957 .

[9]  Robert Hendron Building America Performance Analysis Procedures for Existing Homes , 2006 .

[10]  Danny S. Parker,et al.  Comparison of the ENERGYGAUGE USA and BEopt Building Energy Simulation Programs , 2009 .

[11]  Ravi S. Srinivasan,et al.  Plug-load densities for energy analysis: K-12 schools , 2011 .

[12]  Louis A. Pipes,et al.  Matrix analysis of heat transfer problems , 1957 .

[13]  California Energy,et al.  OFFICE PLUG LOAD FIELD MONITORING REPORT , 2011 .

[14]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Benchmarking energy use in the paper industry: a benchmarking study on process unit level , 2013 .

[15]  Robert Hendron,et al.  Building America House Simulation Protocols , 2010 .

[16]  R. Hendron,et al.  Building America House Simulation Protocols (Revised) , 2010 .