Modeling Joint Charging and Parking Choices of Electric Vehicle Drivers

Electric vehicles (EVs) offer significant opportunities to improve sustainability of the road transport sector. But simultaneously, widespread adoption of EVs would create new challenges. For example, spatiotemporal concentration of charging events in high-density residential or commercial areas would place extreme demands on the power network, causing bottlenecks and grid instability. A novel approach to the typical decentralized control methods for EV charging service providers (CSPs) is presented. First, static price signals based on anticipated demand define a set of charging offers, targeted to segments of EV users. Prices are differentiated either only by time or both by time and place and allow comparison and evaluation of both scenarios. A choice-based revenue management method is employed to optimize allocation of generated charging offers, with respect to revenue outcome for the CSP. The charging coordination techniques are demonstrated through simulation. Data come from the London Travel Demand Survey and particularly trips around Westfield, one of Europe's largest urban shopping malls, representing out-of-home charging behavior for short intervals in a high-demand area. Findings suggest that in a first-come, first-served system, locational pricing might create opportunities both for increased revenue and for relocation of charging events to less-congested facilities. In the revenue management system, locational pricing significantly favors total revenue outcome but without discharging vulnerable areas. However, because agents with conflicting interests participate in the process (infrastructure owners, power system operators, EV drivers), opportunity exists for the CSP to adapt constraints according to the priority of its objectives.

[1]  K. Talluri,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management , 2004 .

[2]  Michel Luis Rivier Abbad,et al.  Regulatory framework and business models for charging plug-in electric vehicles: Infrastructure, agents, and commercial relationships , 2011 .

[3]  D. Manager,et al.  Electric Vehicles , 1926, Nature.

[4]  Zhenhong Lin,et al.  Promoting the Market for Plug-In Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles , 2011 .

[5]  Agostino Von Hassell,et al.  Greater London Authority , 2015 .

[6]  J. Driesen,et al.  The Impact of Charging Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Kalyan T. Talluri,et al.  A Randomized Concave Programming Method for Choice Network Revenue Management , 2010 .

[8]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  The Early U.S. Market for PHEVs: Anticipating Consumer Awareness, Recharge Potential, Design Priorities and Energy Impacts , 2008 .

[9]  Inmaculada Zamora,et al.  Plug-in electric vehicles in electric distribution networks: A review of smart charging approaches , 2014 .

[10]  Kalyan T. Talluri,et al.  An Enhanced Concave Program Relaxation for Choice Network Revenue Management , 2013 .

[11]  Gert Brunekreeft,et al.  Locational signals to reduce network investments in smart distribution grids: What works and what not? , 2011 .

[12]  Juan José Miranda Bront,et al.  A Column Generation Algorithm for Choice-Based Network Revenue Management , 2008, Oper. Res..

[13]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  THE SCHEDULING OF CONSUMER ACTIVITIES: WORK TRIPS , 1982 .

[14]  Manuel A. Matos,et al.  Economic and technical management of an aggregation agent for electric vehicles: a literature survey , 2012 .

[15]  G. Fulli,et al.  A business case for Smart Grid technologies: A systemic perspective , 2011 .

[16]  Garrett J. van Ryzin,et al.  Revenue Management Under a General Discrete Choice Model of Consumer Behavior , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[17]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Choice of parking: Stated preference approach , 1991 .