The use of domination and legitimation in information systems implementation

In this paper, we present the results of a longitudinal case study on information systems (IS) implementation conducted in a community healthcare organization. Using structuration theory as a sensitizing framework, we highlight how the information technology (IT) Management improved their influence through gaining legitimation from other organizational stakeholders, and how the nature of this evolved over time. Our results highlight how an appropriate, sophisticated use of what Giddens refers to as the duality of structure contributed to the consolidation of the IT Manager's credibility and authority. We also report on how the IT Management had most of their actions legitimated as an integral element of their actions. The results also highlight the distributed nature of power, such that even those at the lower end of organizational hierarchy were able to influence the success or failure of IS implementation.

[1]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Exploring the assumptions underlying information systems methodologies: Their impact on past, present and future ISM research , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[2]  G. Ritzer Structuration Theory , 2007 .

[3]  Richard K. Ryland Information Management in Health Services , 1994 .

[4]  John A. McDermid,et al.  Requirements analysis: orthodoxy, fundamentalism and heresy , 1994 .

[5]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[6]  B. Burnes,et al.  The impact of a market system on the public sector: a study of organizational change in the NHS , 1998 .

[7]  A. Giddens Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[8]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Influence Modes, Schema Change, and Organizational Transformation , 1989 .

[9]  Misha W. Vaughan,et al.  Jumpstarting the Information Design for a Community Network , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  Interpreting the management of information systems security , 1995 .

[11]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Informating the Clan: Controlling Physicians' Costs and Outcomes , 2004, MIS Q..

[12]  A. Boonstra Information systems and organizational change , 2002 .

[13]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations , 2003, MIS Q..

[14]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis , 2002, MIS Q..

[15]  N. wenyama,et al.  WHAT DOES COMPUTER SUPPORT FOR COOPERATIVE WORK MEAN ? A STRUCTURATIONAL ANALYSIS OF COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK , 2001 .

[16]  Nicholas Walliman,et al.  Social research methods , 2006 .

[17]  Catherine Chu,et al.  E‐business and organizational change: a structurational approach , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[19]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Lucas D. Introna Management, Information and Power , 1997 .

[21]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[22]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Requirements gathering: the human factor , 1995, CACM.

[23]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[24]  Rens Scheepers,et al.  Using Internet technology within the organization: a structurational analysis of intranets , 1997, GROUP.

[25]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  The History of Texaco's Corporate Information Technology Function: A General Systems Theoretical Interpretation , 2005, MIS Q..

[26]  James H. Gerlach,et al.  Understanding Human-Computer Interaction for Information Systems Design , 1991, MIS Q..

[27]  Zahid Hussain,et al.  A case study of the process of achieving legitimation in information systems development , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  Structure and agency in management accounting research: a response to Boland's interpretive act , 1996 .

[29]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Research on information systems development in Scandinavia—unity in plurality , 1998 .

[30]  Christopher Westrup,et al.  The play of information systems development: Drama and ritual in the development of a nursing information system , 1996, Inf. Technol. People.

[31]  M. Hammersley What's Wrong With Ethnography?: Methodological Explorations , 1992 .

[32]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Persistence and change in system development: a dialectical view , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[34]  D. Robey,et al.  Managing Computer Impact: An International Study of Management and Organizations , 1986 .

[35]  Jay Liebowitz A look at why information systems fail , 1999 .

[36]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Middle Managers , 1993, MIS Q..

[37]  J. Gerring A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[38]  Judy L. Wynekoop,et al.  Studying system development methodologies: an examination of research methods , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[39]  Zahid Hussain,et al.  Evaluating the behaviour of information systems developers: the relevance and utility of paradigms , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[40]  Markos Goulielmos,et al.  Outlining organisational failure in information systems development , 2003 .

[41]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[42]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[43]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[44]  Weidong Xia,et al.  Complexity of Information Systems Development Projects: Conceptualization and Measurement Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  D. Knights,et al.  Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management , 1995 .

[47]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[48]  Karen Locke,et al.  Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince , 1993 .

[49]  R. Hirschheim INFORMATION SYSTEMS EPISTEMOLOGY: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .

[50]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Hidden agendas, power and managerial assumptions in information systems development: An ethnographic study , 1997, Inf. Technol. People.

[52]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[53]  Gail Salaway,et al.  An Organizational Learning Approach to Information Systems Development , 1987, MIS Q..

[54]  Graham C. Low,et al.  Exploring Individual User Satisfaction Within User-Led Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[55]  Laurence Brooks,et al.  Structuration theory and new technology: analysing organizationally situated computer‐aided design (CAD) , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[56]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  STRUCTURATION THEORY IN MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING. , 1990 .

[57]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A Dynamic Framework for Classifying Information Systems Development Methodologies and Approaches , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  The diffusion of information systems development methods , 2003, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[59]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[60]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Definition and Evolution of Information Systems Development Methodologies and Data Modeling , 1995 .

[61]  Kent L. Beck,et al.  Extreme programming explained - embrace change , 1990 .

[62]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, CONTROL AND POWER: THE CENTRALIZATION AND DECENTRALIZATION DEBATE REVISITED* , 1992 .

[63]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[64]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Design for success?: critical success factors in executive information systems development , 1996 .

[65]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Interaction, transformation and information systems development - an extended application of Soft Systems Methodology , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[66]  M. Klein Information politics , 1985 .

[67]  Offer Drori From theory to practice or how not to fail in developing information systems , 1997, SOEN.

[68]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2003, MIS Q..

[69]  Peter Constable,et al.  DSDM: Dynamic Systems Development Method: The Method in Practice , 1997 .

[70]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Challenges in Conducting Empirical Work Using Structuration Theory: Learning from IT Research , 2005 .

[71]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Stakeholders, soft systems and technology: separation and mediation in the analysis of information system requirements , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[72]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Information Systems Design Decisions in a Global Versus Domestic Context , 1995, MIS Q..

[73]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[74]  Blake Ives,et al.  Managing systems development , 2004, Computer.

[75]  Teresa Waring,et al.  The information management and technology strategy of the UK National Health Service – Determining progress in the NHS acute hospital sector , 2000 .

[76]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Developing an Understanding of Interorganizational Systems: Arguments for Multi-Level Analysis and Structuration Theory , 2000, ECIS.

[77]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Quality Management in Systems Development: An Organizational System Perspective , 2000, MIS Q..

[78]  Stuart Maguire,et al.  Towards a "business-led" approach to information systems development , 2000, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[79]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[80]  Patricia Riley,et al.  A Structurationist Account of Political Culture , 1983 .

[81]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[82]  Nathalie N. Mitev,et al.  Less haste more speed: organisational and implementation issues of patient data management systems in an intensive care unit , 1998, ECIS.

[83]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods for Evaluating Computer Information Systems , 2005 .

[84]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[85]  Sharon J. Williams,et al.  Implementing change: the perspective of NHS change agents , 2006 .