Government organizations’ innovative use of the Internet: The case of the Twitter activity of South Korea’s Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

Noting the government’s role in diffusing information across various sectors of society, this study analyzes the Twitter activity of the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MFAFF), one of Korea’s government organizations. From a broad perspective, this study provides a better understanding of innovation activity mediated by social media—particularly the government’s Twitter activity, a topic that has not been addressed by previous webometric research on Triple Helix relationships—by employing social network analysis and content analysis. The results indicate some limitations of the MFAFF’s activity on Twitter as a mutual communication channel, although Twitter has the potential to facilitate risk management. Further, based on the MFAFF’s confined use of its Twitter account, the results suggest that its Twitter account can be an effective information distribution channel, indicating Twitter’s value as a communication tool for innovation activity through social media. This study provides an empirical analysis of the government’s Twitter activity and contributes to the literature by providing an in-depth understanding of the Triple Helix relationship on the Web.

[1]  Dianne Lux Wigand,et al.  Twitter in Government: Building Relationships One Tweet at a Time , 2010, 2010 Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations.

[2]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events , 2009 .

[5]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  A socio-technical perspective on e-government issues in developing countries: a scientometrics approach , 2011, Scientometrics.

[6]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[7]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  EventGraphs: Charting Collections of Conference Connections , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Local government web sites in Finland: A geographic and webometric analysis , 2009, Scientometrics.

[9]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Hyperlink analysis for government websites of Chinese provincial capitals , 2007, Scientometrics.

[10]  R. Garrett Troubling Consequences of Online Political Rumoring , 2011 .

[11]  Shalin Hai-Jew Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World , 2012 .

[12]  Z. Fang E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development , 2002 .

[13]  Han Woo Park,et al.  A Mixed Text Analysis of User Comments on a Portal Site : The `BBK Scandal' in the 2007 Presidential Election of South Korea , 2009 .

[14]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  `Making Moosic': The Development of Personal Relationships on Line and a Comparison to their Off-Line Counterparts , 1998 .

[15]  H. Park Hyperlink network analysis: A new method for the study of social structure on the web , 2003 .

[16]  E. Trist,et al.  A Socio-Technical Perspective , 1993 .

[17]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.

[18]  J. Yum The impact of confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia , 1988 .

[19]  Malcolm R. Parks Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Guohua Wu,et al.  Effects of Perceived Interactivity, Perceived Web Assurance and Disposition to Trust on Initial Online Trust , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  이승욱,et al.  Understanding WeboNaver: API-based search tool for the Naver search engine. , 2009 .

[22]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[23]  Han Woo Park Presence of taiwan on the world wide web in south korea: dynamics of digital and geographical presence on cyberspace , 2004 .

[24]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[25]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  Measuring the triple helix on the web: Longitudinal trends in the university-industry-government relationship in Korea , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text , 2004 .

[27]  Han Woo Park,et al.  How do congressional members appear on the web? Tracking the web visibility of South Korean politicians , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  J. Walther Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[29]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[31]  Kim Holmberg,et al.  Co-inlinking to a municipal Web space: a webometric and content analysis , 2010, Scientometrics.

[32]  Scott A. Golder,et al.  Chapter 10 – Twitter: Conversation, Entertainment, and Information, All in One Network! , 2011 .