Effects of pore interconnectivity on bone regeneration in carbonate apatite blocks
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Koichiro Hayashi,et al. No-Observed-Effect Level of Silver Phosphate in Carbonate Apatite Artificial Bone on Initial Bone Regeneration. , 2021, ACS infectious diseases.
[2] Koichiro Hayashi,et al. Fabrication of highly interconnected porous carbonate apatite blocks based on the setting reaction of calcium sulfate hemihydrate granules , 2021, Ceramics International.
[3] Masaki Kato,et al. Impacts of channel direction on bone tissue engineering in 3D-printed carbonate apatite scaffolds , 2021 .
[4] A. Tsuchiya,et al. Reconstruction of critical-size segmental defects in rat femurs using carbonate apatite honeycomb scaffolds. , 2021, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[5] Koichiro Hayashi,et al. Honeycomb Scaffolds Fabricated Using Extrusion Molding and the Sphere-Packing Theory for Bone Regeneration , 2020 .
[6] K. Koyano,et al. Fabrication and Histological Evaluation of a Fully Interconnected Porous CO3Ap Block Formed by Hydrate Expansion of CaO Granules. , 2020, ACS applied bio materials.
[7] Kai Dröge. Dating , 2020, Sozialtheorie.
[8] K. Ishikawa,et al. Effects of nanopores on the mechanical strength, osteoclastogenesis, and osteogenesis in honeycomb scaffolds. , 2020, Journal of materials chemistry. B.
[9] Koichiro Hayashi,et al. Fabrication of three-dimensional interconnected porous blocks composed of robust carbonate apatite frameworks , 2020 .
[10] K. Ishikawa,et al. Effects of macropore size in carbonate apatite honeycomb scaffolds on bone regeneration. , 2020, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.
[11] K. Ishikawa,et al. Histological comparison of three apatitic bone substitutes with different carbonate contents in alveolar bone defects in a beagle mandible with simultaneous implant installation. , 2020, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.
[12] Koichiro Hayashi,et al. Granular Honeycombs Composed of Carbonate Apatite, Hydroxyapatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate as Bone Graft Substitutes: Effects of Composition on Bone Formation and Maturation. , 2020, ACS applied bio materials.
[13] A. Tsuchiya,et al. Carbonate Apatite Micro‐Honeycombed Blocks Generate Bone Marrow‐Like Tissues as well as Bone , 2019, Advanced biosystems.
[14] Y. Yahata,et al. Comparison of the vertical bone defect healing abilities of carbonate apatite, β-tricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived heterogeneous bone. , 2019, Dental materials journal.
[15] K. Koyano,et al. Application of low-crystalline carbonate apatite granules in 2-stage sinus floor augmentation: a prospective clinical trial and histomorphometric evaluation , 2019, Journal of periodontal & implant science.
[16] K. Ishikawa. Carbonate apatite bone replacement: learn from the bone , 2019, Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan.
[17] Koichiro Hayashi,et al. Honeycomb blocks composed of carbonate apatite, β-tricalcium phosphate, and hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration: effects of composition on biological responses , 2019, Materials today. Bio.
[18] K. Ishikawa,et al. Fabrication and evaluation of interconnected porous carbonate apatite from alpha tricalcium phosphate spheres. , 2019, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.
[19] A. Tsuchiya,et al. Physical and Histological Comparison of Hydroxyapatite, Carbonate Apatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes , 2018, Materials.
[20] Yunqing Kang,et al. Channels in a porous scaffold: a new player for vascularization. , 2018, Regenerative medicine.
[21] K. Winter,et al. Risk factors for post-operative complications after procedures for autologous bone augmentation from different donor sites. , 2017, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.
[22] A. A. Zadpoor,et al. Effects of bone substitute architecture and surface properties on cell response, angiogenesis, and structure of new bone. , 2017, Journal of materials chemistry. B.
[23] K. Yeung,et al. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review , 2017, Bioactive materials.
[24] Panayiotis D. Megaloikonomos,et al. Intercalary reconstructions after bone tumor resections: a review of treatments , 2017, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.
[25] K. Ishikawa,et al. Evaluation of carbonate apatite blocks fabricated from dicalcium phosphate dihydrate blocks for reconstruction of rabbit femoral and tibial defects , 2017, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.
[26] Y. Yang,et al. Channeled β‐TCP Scaffolds Promoted Vascularization and Bone Augmentation in Mandible of Beagle Dogs , 2016 .
[27] Elena García-Gareta,et al. Osteoinduction of bone grafting materials for bone repair and regeneration. , 2015, Bone.
[28] K. Koyano,et al. Histological Comparison in Rats between Carbonate Apatite Fabricated from Gypsum and Sintered Hydroxyapatite on Bone Remodeling , 2015, BioMed research international.
[29] H. Nagai,et al. Effects of low crystalline carbonate apatite on proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow cells , 2015, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.
[30] H. Shigeishi,et al. Risk of bacterial contamination of bone harvesting devices used for autogenous bone graft in implant surgery , 2013, Head & Face Medicine.
[31] M. Barbeck,et al. The chemical composition of synthetic bone substitutes influences tissue reactions in vivo: histological and histomorphometrical analysis of the cellular inflammatory response to hydroxyapatite, beta-tricalcium phosphate and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics , 2012, Biomedical materials.
[32] G. Calori,et al. The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: any specific needs? , 2011, Injury.
[33] G. Hannink,et al. Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: what is optimal for bone regeneration? , 2011, Injury.
[34] Lu Jianxi,et al. The effect of pore size on tissue ingrowth and neovascularization in porous bioceramics of controlled architecture in vivo , 2011, Biomedical materials.
[35] Amy J Wagoner Johnson,et al. Multiscale osteointegration as a new paradigm for the design of calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[36] K. Ishikawa. Bone Substitute Fabrication Based on Dissolution-Precipitation Reactions , 2010, Materials.
[37] H. Yoshikawa,et al. A comparative assessment of synthetic ceramic bone substitutes with different composition and microstructure in rabbit femoral condyle model. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.
[38] M. Mastrogiacomo,et al. Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[39] D. Kaplan,et al. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.
[40] H. Takita,et al. Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. , 1997, Journal of biochemistry.
[41] R Z LeGeros,et al. Calcium phosphates in oral biology and medicine. , 1991, Monographs in oral science.
[42] J. Osborn,et al. The material science of calcium phosphate ceramics. , 1980, Biomaterials.
[43] R. Legeros,et al. Apatite Crystallites: Effects of Carbonate on Morphology , 1967, Science.
[44] F. Bakker,et al. Properties of calcium phosphate ceramics in relation to their in vivo behavior. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.
[45] G. Daculsi,et al. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics: influence of macropore diameter and macroporosity percentage on bone ingrowth. , 1998, Biomaterials.
[46] H. Chambers,et al. Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[47] C. Haynes,et al. Mineralogical Studies On Bone Apatite and Their Implications for Radiocarbon Dating , 1977, Radiocarbon.