Effects of pore interconnectivity on bone regeneration in carbonate apatite blocks

Abstract Porous architecture in bone substitutes, notably the interconnectivity of pores, is a critical factor for bone ingrowth. However, controlling the pore interconnectivity while maintaining the microarchitecture has not yet been achieved using conventional methods, such as sintering. Herein, we fabricated a porous block using the crystal growth of calcium sulfate dihydrate, and controlled the pore interconnectivity by limiting the region of crystal growth. The calcium sulfate dihydrate blocks were transformed to bone apatite, carbonate apatite (CO3Ap) through dissolution–precipitation reactions. Thus, CO3Ap blocks with 15% and 30% interconnected pore volumes were obtained while maintaining the microarchitecture: they were designated as CO3Ap-15 and CO3Ap-30, respectively. At 4 weeks after implantation in a rabbit femur defect, new bone formed throughout CO3Ap-30, whereas little bone was formed in the center region of CO3Ap-15. At 12 weeks after implantation, a large portion of CO3Ap-30 was replaced with new bone and the boundary with the host bone became blurred. In contrast, CO3Ap-15 remained in the defect and the boundary with the host bone was still clear. Thus, the interconnected pores promote bone ingrowth, followed by replacement of the material with new bone. These findings provide a useful guide for designing bone substitutes for rapid bone regeneration.

[1]  Koichiro Hayashi,et al.  No-Observed-Effect Level of Silver Phosphate in Carbonate Apatite Artificial Bone on Initial Bone Regeneration. , 2021, ACS infectious diseases.

[2]  Koichiro Hayashi,et al.  Fabrication of highly interconnected porous carbonate apatite blocks based on the setting reaction of calcium sulfate hemihydrate granules , 2021, Ceramics International.

[3]  Masaki Kato,et al.  Impacts of channel direction on bone tissue engineering in 3D-printed carbonate apatite scaffolds , 2021 .

[4]  A. Tsuchiya,et al.  Reconstruction of critical-size segmental defects in rat femurs using carbonate apatite honeycomb scaffolds. , 2021, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[5]  Koichiro Hayashi,et al.  Honeycomb Scaffolds Fabricated Using Extrusion Molding and the Sphere-Packing Theory for Bone Regeneration , 2020 .

[6]  K. Koyano,et al.  Fabrication and Histological Evaluation of a Fully Interconnected Porous CO3Ap Block Formed by Hydrate Expansion of CaO Granules. , 2020, ACS applied bio materials.

[7]  Kai Dröge Dating , 2020, Sozialtheorie.

[8]  K. Ishikawa,et al.  Effects of nanopores on the mechanical strength, osteoclastogenesis, and osteogenesis in honeycomb scaffolds. , 2020, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[9]  Koichiro Hayashi,et al.  Fabrication of three-dimensional interconnected porous blocks composed of robust carbonate apatite frameworks , 2020 .

[10]  K. Ishikawa,et al.  Effects of macropore size in carbonate apatite honeycomb scaffolds on bone regeneration. , 2020, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[11]  K. Ishikawa,et al.  Histological comparison of three apatitic bone substitutes with different carbonate contents in alveolar bone defects in a beagle mandible with simultaneous implant installation. , 2020, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[12]  Koichiro Hayashi,et al.  Granular Honeycombs Composed of Carbonate Apatite, Hydroxyapatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate as Bone Graft Substitutes: Effects of Composition on Bone Formation and Maturation. , 2020, ACS applied bio materials.

[13]  A. Tsuchiya,et al.  Carbonate Apatite Micro‐Honeycombed Blocks Generate Bone Marrow‐Like Tissues as well as Bone , 2019, Advanced biosystems.

[14]  Y. Yahata,et al.  Comparison of the vertical bone defect healing abilities of carbonate apatite, β-tricalcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived heterogeneous bone. , 2019, Dental materials journal.

[15]  K. Koyano,et al.  Application of low-crystalline carbonate apatite granules in 2-stage sinus floor augmentation: a prospective clinical trial and histomorphometric evaluation , 2019, Journal of periodontal & implant science.

[16]  K. Ishikawa Carbonate apatite bone replacement: learn from the bone , 2019, Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan.

[17]  Koichiro Hayashi,et al.  Honeycomb blocks composed of carbonate apatite, β-tricalcium phosphate, and hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration: effects of composition on biological responses , 2019, Materials today. Bio.

[18]  K. Ishikawa,et al.  Fabrication and evaluation of interconnected porous carbonate apatite from alpha tricalcium phosphate spheres. , 2019, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[19]  A. Tsuchiya,et al.  Physical and Histological Comparison of Hydroxyapatite, Carbonate Apatite, and β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes , 2018, Materials.

[20]  Yunqing Kang,et al.  Channels in a porous scaffold: a new player for vascularization. , 2018, Regenerative medicine.

[21]  K. Winter,et al.  Risk factors for post-operative complications after procedures for autologous bone augmentation from different donor sites. , 2017, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[22]  A. A. Zadpoor,et al.  Effects of bone substitute architecture and surface properties on cell response, angiogenesis, and structure of new bone. , 2017, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[23]  K. Yeung,et al.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review , 2017, Bioactive materials.

[24]  Panayiotis D. Megaloikonomos,et al.  Intercalary reconstructions after bone tumor resections: a review of treatments , 2017, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[25]  K. Ishikawa,et al.  Evaluation of carbonate apatite blocks fabricated from dicalcium phosphate dihydrate blocks for reconstruction of rabbit femoral and tibial defects , 2017, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[26]  Y. Yang,et al.  Channeled β‐TCP Scaffolds Promoted Vascularization and Bone Augmentation in Mandible of Beagle Dogs , 2016 .

[27]  Elena García-Gareta,et al.  Osteoinduction of bone grafting materials for bone repair and regeneration. , 2015, Bone.

[28]  K. Koyano,et al.  Histological Comparison in Rats between Carbonate Apatite Fabricated from Gypsum and Sintered Hydroxyapatite on Bone Remodeling , 2015, BioMed research international.

[29]  H. Nagai,et al.  Effects of low crystalline carbonate apatite on proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow cells , 2015, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[30]  H. Shigeishi,et al.  Risk of bacterial contamination of bone harvesting devices used for autogenous bone graft in implant surgery , 2013, Head & Face Medicine.

[31]  M. Barbeck,et al.  The chemical composition of synthetic bone substitutes influences tissue reactions in vivo: histological and histomorphometrical analysis of the cellular inflammatory response to hydroxyapatite, beta-tricalcium phosphate and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics , 2012, Biomedical materials.

[32]  G. Calori,et al.  The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: any specific needs? , 2011, Injury.

[33]  G. Hannink,et al.  Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: what is optimal for bone regeneration? , 2011, Injury.

[34]  Lu Jianxi,et al.  The effect of pore size on tissue ingrowth and neovascularization in porous bioceramics of controlled architecture in vivo , 2011, Biomedical materials.

[35]  Amy J Wagoner Johnson,et al.  Multiscale osteointegration as a new paradigm for the design of calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[36]  K. Ishikawa Bone Substitute Fabrication Based on Dissolution-Precipitation Reactions , 2010, Materials.

[37]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  A comparative assessment of synthetic ceramic bone substitutes with different composition and microstructure in rabbit femoral condyle model. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[38]  M. Mastrogiacomo,et al.  Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[39]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[40]  H. Takita,et al.  Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. , 1997, Journal of biochemistry.

[41]  R Z LeGeros,et al.  Calcium phosphates in oral biology and medicine. , 1991, Monographs in oral science.

[42]  J. Osborn,et al.  The material science of calcium phosphate ceramics. , 1980, Biomaterials.

[43]  R. Legeros,et al.  Apatite Crystallites: Effects of Carbonate on Morphology , 1967, Science.

[44]  F. Bakker,et al.  Properties of calcium phosphate ceramics in relation to their in vivo behavior. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.

[45]  G. Daculsi,et al.  Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics: influence of macropore diameter and macroporosity percentage on bone ingrowth. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[46]  H. Chambers,et al.  Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[47]  C. Haynes,et al.  Mineralogical Studies On Bone Apatite and Their Implications for Radiocarbon Dating , 1977, Radiocarbon.