Optimizing sheet metal forming processes—Using a design hierarchy and response surface methodology

In the present paper optimization has been used to evaluate alternative sheet metal forming processes. Six process set-ups were first defined in a hierarchy of designs and optimization was then use ...

[1]  E. Doege,et al.  Design and application of pliable blank holder systems for the optimization of process conditions in sheet metal forming , 2001 .

[2]  N. Stander,et al.  Optimization of a sheet metal forming process using successive multipoint approximations , 1998 .

[3]  Nielen Stander,et al.  The successive response surface method applied to sheet-metal forming , 2001 .

[4]  Tomaž Pepelnjak,et al.  Numerical simulations in optimisation of product and forming process , 2001 .

[5]  Josef Reissner,et al.  Optimization of sheet-metal forming processes using the special-purpose program AUTOFORM , 1995 .

[6]  Yohei Abe,et al.  Optimisation of the distribution of wall thickness in the multistage sheet metal forming of wheel disks , 2002 .

[7]  A. Makinouchi,et al.  Advance in FEM Simulation and its Related Technologies in Sheet Metal Forming , 1998 .

[8]  Vassili Toropov,et al.  Optimization of Blank Design for Deep Drawing Process Based on the Interaction of High and Low Fidelity Models , 2002 .

[9]  Hakim Naceur,et al.  Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead design in sheet metal forming process , 2001 .

[10]  Morten Rikard Jensen,et al.  Optimization of the draw-die design in conventional deep-drawing in order to minimise tool wear , 1998 .

[11]  W. Sosnowski,et al.  Sensitivity based optimization of sheet metal forming tools , 2002 .

[12]  Dong-Yol Yang,et al.  Optimum blank design in sheet metal forming by the deformation path iteration method , 1999 .

[13]  A. Makinouchi,et al.  Sheet metal forming simulation in industry , 1996 .

[14]  Tomas Jansson,et al.  Optimization of Draw-In for an Automotive Sheet Metal Part An evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces , 2005 .

[15]  Ana Reis,et al.  The use of finite element simulation for optimization of metal forming and tool design , 2001 .

[16]  Jong-Yop Kim,et al.  Optimum Blank Design of Automobile Sub-Frame , 1998 .

[17]  Eiji Nakamachi,et al.  Development of optimum process design system by numerical simulation , 1996 .

[18]  R. Haftka,et al.  Response surface approximations for structural optimization , 1996 .

[19]  K. Kuzman,et al.  Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by the use of numerical simulations , 2002 .

[20]  Kichan Son,et al.  Optimum blank shape design by sensitivity analysis , 2000 .

[21]  Tomas Jansson,et al.  Using the response surface methodology and the D-optimality criterion in crashworthiness related problems , 2002 .

[22]  Nielen Stander,et al.  Springback Compensation in Sheet Metal Forming Using a Successive Response Surface Method , 2002 .

[23]  Tomas Jansson,et al.  Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization – with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming , 2003 .

[24]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[25]  Hakim Naceur,et al.  Recent developments on the analysis and optimum design of sheet metal forming parts using a simplified inverse approach , 2000 .