Students' responses to the introduction of a digital laboratory guide in medical neuroscience

This study investigated student acceptance of a digital laboratory guide in a medical neuroscience course. The guide was created in Macromedia™ Authorware 5.2 by transforming a text-based lab manual into a comprehensive multimedia program. Student attitudinal survey data indicated that the guide was used primarily as a study tool at home. Some 53% of students (primarily males) used the guide for independent study exclusively, while the remainder used it for both independent and group study; 87% of the class used the guide as a routine study tool rather than as a final review for examinations. Most students perceived that the guide increased their study efficiency and lab performance while decreasing their out-of-class study time in the lab. Female students were significantly more enthusiastic about the guide's impact on their study efficiency, lab performance and laboratory study time. Gender differences in student satisfaction with and use of instructional multimedia are discussed.

[1]  C P Friedman,et al.  The research we should be doing , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  Wilhelmina C. Savenye,et al.  How Do Learning Styles Relate to Performance in a Computer Applications Course , 1992 .

[3]  Gayle J. Yaverbaum,et al.  Multimedia projection: an exploratory study of student perceptions regarding interest, organization, and clarity , 1997 .

[4]  Kenneth Tait.  Replacing lectures with multimedia CBL: Student attitudes and reactions , 1998 .

[5]  M. Hojat,et al.  Gender comparisons of medical students' psychosocial profiles , 1999, Medical education.

[6]  T J Teyler,et al.  Use of computer-assisted courseware in teaching neuroscience: the Graphic Brain. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  P. Cruz,et al.  Interactive mechanisms for teaching dermatology to medical students. , 1998, Archives of dermatology.

[8]  M. Kohlmeier,et al.  Getting nutrition education into medical schools: a computer-based approach. , 2000, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[9]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study , 2000 .

[10]  Harold P. Lehmann,et al.  Research Paper: An Ethnographic, Controlled Study of the Use of a Computer-based Histology Atlas during a Laboratory Course , 1999, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  Chris Candler,et al.  An Analysis of Web-Based Instruction in a Neurosciences Course , 1998 .

[12]  S. Petcharatana,et al.  Does computer‐assisted instruction really help to improve the learning process? , 2001, Medical education.

[13]  G C Rinehart,et al.  Acquisition of surgical skills: a randomized trial of didactic, videotape, and computer-based training. , 1999, Surgery.

[14]  Albert Lamperti,et al.  Computer‐based neuroanatomy laboratory for medical students , 1997, The Anatomical record.

[15]  R. Feldman,et al.  The effectiveness of teaching clinical pharmacokinetics by computer , 1993, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[16]  K. B. Johnson,et al.  Quantifying the Literature of Computer‐aided Instruction in Medical Education , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[17]  M P D'Alessandro,et al.  A comparison of educational interventions. Multimedia textbook, standard lecture, and printed textbook. , 1995 .

[18]  New Ways To Teach Neuroscience: Integrating Two Teaching Styles with Two Instructional Technologies. , 1998 .

[19]  R. Hilliard.  How do medical students learn: Medical student learning styles and factors that affect these learning styles , 1995 .

[20]  David Steele,et al.  Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and student evaluation of computerised instruction , 2002, Medical education.

[21]  J. Teichman,et al.  Multimedia to teach urology to medical students. , 1999, Urology.

[22]  Gayle V. Davidson-Shivers,et al.  Hypermedia and learning styles: can performance be influenced? , 1998 .

[23]  Joan,et al.  n An Ethnographic , Controlled Study of the Use of a Computer-based Histology Atlas during a Laboratory Course , 2022 .

[24]  D. Dunn,et al.  Gender and achievement in clinical medical students: a path analysis , 2001, Medical education.

[25]  D. Wood,et al.  Love it or hate it? Medical students' attitudes to computer‐assisted learning , 2002, Medical education.

[26]  E. Palmer,et al.  Computers in medical education 1: evaluation of a problem-orientated learning package. , 1998, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[27]  D M D'Alessandro,et al.  Longitudinal follow-up comparison of educational interventions: multimedia textbook, traditional lecture, and printed textbook. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[28]  G R Norman,et al.  The inadequacy of recent research on computer‐assisted instruction , 1991, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[29]  David Steele,et al.  Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and test performance with computer-aided instruction. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[30]  D. Gelb.  Is newer necessarily better? , 2001, Neurology.

[31]  P. Peplow,et al.  Attitudes and Examination Performance of Female and Male Medical Students in an Active, Case-Based Learning Programme in Anatomy. , 1998 .

[32]  J. Rosser,et al.  Effectiveness of a CD-ROM multimedia tutorial in transferring cognitive knowledge essential for laparoscopic skill training. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[33]  Eta S. Berner,et al.  Medical Informatics for Medical Students: Not Just Because It's There , 1996 .

[34]  Paul Hagler,et al.  Invalid implicit assumption in CBI comparison research , 1987 .

[35]  Timothy T. Perry,et al.  University students' attitudes towards multimedia presentations , 1998, Br. J. Educ. Technol..