Tuning the Strength of a Bacterial N-end Rule Degradation Signal*

The N-end rule is a degradation pathway conserved from bacteria to mammals that links a protein's stability in vivo to the identity of its N-terminal residue. In Escherichia coli, the components of this pathway directly responsible for protein degradation are the ClpAP protease and its adaptor ClpS. We recently demonstrated that ClpAP is able to recognize N-end motifs in the absence of ClpS although with significantly reduced substrate affinity. In this study, a systematic sequence analysis reveals new features of N-end rule degradation signals. To achieve specificity, recognition of an N-end motif by the protease-adaptor complex uses both the identity of the N-terminal residue and a free α-amino group. Acidic residues near the first residue decrease substrate affinity, demonstrating that the identity of adjacent residues can affect recognition although significant flexibility is tolerated. However, shortening the distance between the N-end residue and the stably folded portion of a protein prevents degradation entirely, indicating that an N-end signal alone is not always sufficient for degradation. Together, these data define in vitro the sequence and structural requirements for the function of bacterial N-end signals.

[1]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  The N-end rule: functions, mysteries, uses. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Sequence determinants of cytosolic N-terminal protein processing. , 1986, European journal of biochemistry.

[3]  A. Hershko Roles of ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis in cell cycle control. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.

[4]  J. Hoskins,et al.  Unfolding and internalization of proteins by the ATP-dependent proteases ClpXP and ClpAP. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  T. Baker,et al.  Dynamics of substrate denaturation and translocation by the ClpXP degradation machine. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[6]  Jimin Wang,et al.  The Structure of ClpP at 2.3 Å Resolution Suggests a Model for ATP-Dependent Proteolysis , 1997, Cell.

[7]  D. Dubnau,et al.  Competence in Bacillus subtilis is controlled by regulated proteolysis of a transcription factor , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[8]  A. Horwich,et al.  ClpS, a substrate modulator of the ClpAP machine. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[9]  T. Baker,et al.  Overlapping recognition determinants within the ssrA degradation tag allow modulation of proteolysis , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. Tobias,et al.  The N-end rule in bacteria. , 1991, Science.

[11]  Greg L. Hersch,et al.  Sculpting the Proteome with AAA+ Proteases and Disassembly Machines , 2004, Cell.

[12]  M. Eck,et al.  Structural basis of degradation signal recognition by SspB, a specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP proteolytic machine. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[13]  T. Baker,et al.  Flexible linkers leash the substrate binding domain of SspB to a peptide module that stabilizes delivery complexes with the AAA+ ClpXP protease. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[14]  J. W. Little,et al.  The SOS regulatory system: control of its state by the level of RecA protease. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  A. Goldberg,et al.  The unfolding of substrates and ubiquitin-independent protein degradation by proteasomes. , 2001, Biochimie.

[16]  T. Baker,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent substrate handoff from the SspB adaptor to the AAA+ ClpXP protease. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[17]  Tania A. Baker,et al.  Linkage between ATP Consumption and Mechanical Unfolding during the Protein Processing Reactions of an AAA+ Degradation Machine , 2003, Cell.

[18]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. , 1986, Science.

[19]  J. Schneider-Mergener,et al.  ClpS is an essential component of the N-end rule pathway in Escherichia coli , 2006, Nature.

[20]  A. Varshavsky The N-end rule , 1992, Cell.

[21]  T. Baker,et al.  Latent ClpX-recognition signals ensure LexA destruction after DNA damage. , 2003, Genes & development.

[22]  T. Baker,et al.  ClpS modulates but is not essential for bacterial N-end rule degradation. , 2007, Genes & development.

[23]  R. Sauer,et al.  The ClpXP and ClpAP proteases degrade proteins with carboxy-terminal peptide tails added by the SsrA-tagging system. , 1998, Genes & development.

[24]  S. Gottesman,et al.  The two-component, ATP-dependent Clp protease of Escherichia coli. Purification, cloning, and mutational analysis of the ATP-binding component. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[25]  A. Horwich,et al.  Global unfolding of a substrate protein by the Hsp100 chaperone ClpA , 1999, Nature.

[26]  T. Baker,et al.  Structure of a delivery protein for an AAA+ protease in complex with a peptide degradation tag. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[27]  J. Hoskins,et al.  Protein binding and unfolding by the chaperone ClpA and degradation by the protease ClpAP. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  T. Butt,et al.  SUMO fusions and SUMO-specific protease for efficient expression and purification of proteins , 2004, Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics.

[29]  A. Goffeau,et al.  Cloning and functional analysis of the arginyl-tRNA-protein transferase gene ATE1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[30]  Michael I. Wilson,et al.  Peptide blockade of HIFα degradation modulates cellular metabolism and angiogenesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  T. Baker,et al.  Proteomic discovery of cellular substrates of the ClpXP protease reveals five classes of ClpX-recognition signals. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[32]  T. Baker,et al.  Distinct structural elements of the adaptor ClpS are required for regulating degradation by ClpAP , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[33]  G. Walker,et al.  Cellular responses to DNA damage. , 1985, Environmental health perspectives.