Correction of artefacts in optical projection tomography

A new imaging technique called optical projection tomography (OPT), essentially an optical version of x-ray computed tomography (CT), provides molecular specificity, cellular resolution and larger specimen coverage (≈1 cubic centimetre) than was previously possible with other imaging techniques. It is ideally suited to gene expression studies in small animals. Reconstructed OPT images demonstrate several artefacts which reduce the overall image quality. In this paper, we describe methods to prevent smear artefacts due to illumination intensity fluctuation, ring artefacts due to CCD pixel sensitivity variation and a new ‘detector edge’ artefact caused by non-zero background signal. We also present an automated method to align the position of the rotational axis during image reconstruction. Finally, we propose a method to eliminate bowl artefacts due to projection truncation using a lower resolution OPT scan of the same specimen. This solution also provides OPT with the ability to obtain a high-resolution reconstruction from a region of interest of a specimen that is larger than the field of view. Implementation of these corrections and modifications increases the accuracy of the OPT imaging technique and extends its capabilities to obtain higher resolution data from within a whole specimen.

[1]  Changhuei Yang,et al.  Molecular Contrast Optical Coherence Tomography: A Review¶ , 2005, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[2]  Jeffrey L. Wrana,et al.  Baf60c is essential for function of BAF chromatin remodelling complexes in heart development , 2004, Nature.

[3]  Johnathon R. Walls,et al.  Foxh1 is essential for development of the anterior heart field. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[4]  F. Del Bene,et al.  Optical Sectioning Deep Inside Live Embryos by Selective Plane Illumination Microscopy , 2004, Science.

[5]  Richard Baldock,et al.  3 dimensional modelling of early human brain development using optical projection tomography , 2004, BMC Neuroscience.

[6]  G. Yamada,et al.  Bapx1 regulates patterning in the middle ear: altered regulatory role in the transition from the proximal jaw during vertebrate evolution , 2004, Development.

[7]  J. Sharpe Optical projection tomography. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[8]  J. Hecksher-Sørensen,et al.  Optical Projection Tomography as a Tool for 3D Microscopy and Gene Expression Studies , 2002, Science.

[9]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Morphologic phenotyping with MR microscopy: the visible mouse. , 2002, Radiology.

[10]  J. Vane,et al.  Optical Projection Tomography as a Tool for 3D Microscopy and Gene Expression Studies , 2002 .

[11]  W. Weninger,et al.  Phenotyping transgenic embryos: a rapid 3-D screening method based on episcopic fluorescence image capturing , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[12]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Principles of computerized tomographic imaging , 2001, Classics in applied mathematics.

[13]  James Sharpe,et al.  3D confocal reconstruction of gene expression in mouse , 2001, Mechanisms of Development.

[14]  V. Tuchin Tissue Optics: Light Scattering Methods and Instruments for Medical Diagnosis , 2000 .

[15]  K. Bae,et al.  Efficient correction for CT image artifacts caused by objects extending outside the scan field of view. , 2000, Medical physics.

[16]  D. A. Christopher,et al.  Advances in ultrasound biomicroscopy. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Joseph M. Schmitt,et al.  Optical coherence tomography (OCT): a review , 1999 .

[18]  S. Arridge Optical tomography in medical imaging , 1999 .

[19]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  H. G. Rylander,et al.  Use of an agent to reduce scattering in skin , 1999, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[21]  J. M. Rogers,et al.  Confocal laser scanning microscopy of apoptosis in organogenesis-stage mouse embryos. , 1998, Cytometry.

[22]  S M Jorgensen,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of vasculature and parenchyma in intact rodent organs with X-ray micro-CT. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[23]  G. Müller,et al.  Medical Optical Tomography: Functional Imaging and Monitoring , 1993 .

[24]  D. Gard Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of microtubules in amphibian oocytes and eggs. , 1993, Methods in cell biology.

[25]  M W Klymkowsky,et al.  Whole-mount staining of Xenopus and other vertebrates. , 1991, Methods in cell biology.

[26]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[27]  Randall L. Woodlee,et al.  Enhanced dc arc lamp performance for spectroscopic applications , 1989 .

[28]  F. P. Bolin,et al.  Refractive index of some mammalian tissues using a fiber optic cladding method. , 1989, Applied optics.

[29]  J. Janesick,et al.  Charge-Coupled-Device Charge-Collection Efficiency And The Photon-Transfer Technique , 1987 .

[30]  B. Flannery,et al.  Three-Dimensional X-ray Microtomography , 1987, Science.

[31]  I T Young,et al.  A comparison of different focus functions for use in autofocus algorithms. , 1985, Cytometry.

[32]  J C Gore,et al.  Some sources of artefact in computed tomography , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  J C Gore,et al.  The reconstruction of objects from incomplete projections , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  R M Lewitt,et al.  Processing of incomplete measurement data in computed tomography. , 1979, Medical physics.