Information technology-enabled change: the risks and rewards of business process redesign and automation

Information technology-enabled business process redesign is a means of levering the power of information technology to change organizational processes radically resulting in substantial improvements in corporate effectiveness and efficiency. Some of the greatest opportunities for organizational improvement using IT are associated with the support of processes that cross functional boundaries. In this search for improvement, it is important to recognize that there are both process risks associated with business process redesign and structural risks associated with crossing functional boundaries. This paper proposes a model that relates the risks and rewards of IT-enabled change and reports on the experience of 59 organizations. The study found that organizations tend to emphasize either cross-functional business process redesign or intrafunctional automation projects. The results suggest that corporations that wish to take advantage of the rewards available from information technology-enabled change should recognize the risks associated with cross-functional change and process redesign.

[1]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[2]  Varun Grover,et al.  Recognizing the politics of MIS , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[3]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[4]  Debra L. Nelson,et al.  Individual Adjustment to Information-Driven Technologies: A Critical Review , 1990, MIS Q..

[5]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[6]  Paul R. Lawrence,et al.  How to Deal with Resistance to Change , 1970 .

[7]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[8]  Kirk D. Fiedler,et al.  Business Process Reengineering: Charting a Strategic Path for the Information Age , 1994 .

[9]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[10]  D DewarRobert,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations , 1986 .

[11]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Determinants of Turnover Intentions: Comparing IC and IS Personnel , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[13]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .

[14]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[15]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Toward an Assessment of Software Development Risk , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Kirk D. Fiedler,et al.  Exploring the success of information technology enabled business process reengineering , 1994 .

[17]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[18]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Information Systems and User Resistance: Theory and Practice , 1988, Comput. J..

[19]  F. W. McFarlan,et al.  Portfolio approach to information systems , 1989 .

[20]  Varun Grover,et al.  Information technology enabled business process redesign: An integrated planning framework , 1993 .

[21]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[22]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Diagnosis of an information system failure: A framework and interpretive process , 1992, Inf. Manag..