Sparse least square twin support vector machine with adaptive norm

By promoting the parallel hyperplanes to non-parallel ones in SVM, twin support vector machines (TWSVM) have attracted more attention. There are many modifications of them. However, most of the modifications minimize the loss function subject to the I2-norm or I1-norm penalty. These methods are non-adaptive since their penalty forms are fixed and pre-determined for any types of data. To overcome the above shortcoming, we propose lp norm least square twin support vector machine (lpLSTSVM). Our new model is an adaptive learning procedure with lp-norm (0<p<1), where p is viewed as an adjustable parameter and can be automatically chosen by data. By adjusting the parameter p, lpLSTSVM can not only select relevant features but also improve the classification accuracy. The solutions of the optimization problems in lpLSTSVM are obtained by solving a series systems of linear equations (LEs) and the lower bounds of the solution is established which is extremely helpful for feature selection. Experiments carried out on several standard UCI data sets and synthetic data sets show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  Michael Elad,et al.  From Sparse Solutions of Systems of Equations to Sparse Modeling of Signals and Images , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[2]  Reshma Khemchandani,et al.  Twin Support Vector Machines for Pattern Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Y. Ye,et al.  Lower Bound Theory of Nonzero Entries in Solutions of ℓ2-ℓp Minimization , 2010, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[4]  Reshma Khemchandani,et al.  Optimal kernel selection in twin support vector machines , 2009, Optim. Lett..

[5]  Shangbing Gao,et al.  1-Norm least squares twin support vector machines , 2011, Neurocomputing.

[6]  Nai-Yang Deng,et al.  Cancer Related Gene Identification via p-norm Support Vector Machine ∗ , 2010 .

[7]  Yuan-Hai Shao,et al.  Mixed-norm linear support vector machine , 2012, Neural Computing and Applications.

[8]  Ding Sheng-feng An Improved Twin Support Vector Machine , 2012 .

[9]  Yuan-Hai Shao,et al.  Manifold proximal support vector machine for semi-supervised classification , 2013, Applied Intelligence.

[10]  C. M. Bishop,et al.  Improvements on Twin Support Vector Machines , 2011 .

[11]  Yuan-Hai Shao,et al.  Least squares twin parametric-margin support vector machine for classification , 2013, Applied Intelligence.

[12]  Madan Gopal,et al.  Least squares twin support vector machines for pattern classification , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Madan Gopal,et al.  Application of smoothing technique on twin support vector machines , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[14]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Iterative methods for sparse linear systems , 2003 .

[15]  Olvi L. Mangasarian,et al.  Multisurface proximal support vector machine classification via generalized eigenvalues , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  Ying Jie Tian,et al.  Lp-norm proximal support vector machine and its applications , 2010, ICCS.

[17]  Anirban Mukherjee,et al.  Nonparallel plane proximal classifier , 2009, Signal Process..

[18]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties , 2001 .

[19]  Ying-jie Tian,et al.  Improved twin support vector machine , 2013, Science China Mathematics.

[20]  Zhiqiang Zhang,et al.  Adaptive feature selection via a new version of support vector machine , 2012, Neural Computing and Applications.

[21]  Jun Yu,et al.  lp-norm support vector machine with CCCP , 2010, 2010 Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery.

[22]  Yitian Xu,et al.  K-nearest neighbor-based weighted twin support vector regression , 2014, Applied Intelligence.