Medical handovers across shifts within a five-day-working model: results from an electronic handover system in an acute NHS trust

ABSTRACT Electronic handover tools have been advocated as a potential strategy to improve the quality of handover, especially during on-call periods at night and weekends. We aimed to quantify, categorise and explore the temporal relationship of handover tasks stored on an electronic handover system (eHandover) in an acute UK hospital trust in which the day-time primary team worked only weekdays, with only the day-time and night-time on-call teams being available at weekends. Second, we evaluated whether tasks that remained in the eHandover system throughout several shifts were likely to be completed. We defined the shift gap as the number of clinical shifts that passed between the creation of the handover task and its completion. 11,071 electronic handover parcels created on eHandover between March 2010 and January 2011 were analysed. More handovers were requested for completion on weekends (70 parcels a day) than on routine weekdays (22 parcels a day; p<0.001). The receiving teams reported that 89.4% (9,900) of the handover parcels were completed. Greater amounts of handover work was requested over weekends, when tasks were often transferred across many clinical shifts. Despite this, task-completion rates on eHandover remained consistently high. The use of a well-designed electronic handover system as part of a systematic intervention, in combination with organised verbal handover meetings, can help to reduce the risk of communication failure across shifts.

[1]  A. Majeed,et al.  Weekend mortality for emergency admissions. A large, multicentre study , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[2]  E. Kiely,et al.  A technique for excision of abdominal and pelvic neuroblastomas. , 2007, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[3]  T. Evans The Future Hospital Commission , 2013, The Lancet.

[4]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  David D Pothier,et al.  An experimental comparison of handover methods. , 2007, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[6]  S. Jeffcott,et al.  Resilience in healthcare and clinical handover , 2009, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[7]  Jenelle Matic,et al.  Review: bringing patient safety to the forefront through structured computerisation during clinical handover. , 2011, Journal of clinical nursing.

[8]  D. Meltzer,et al.  Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[9]  Tannaz Moin,et al.  Consequences of inadequate sign-out for patient care. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  I. Philibert,et al.  Use of strategies from high-reliability organisations to the patient hand-off by resident physicians: practical implications , 2009, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[11]  Paul Barach,et al.  Patient care handovers: what will it take to ensure quality and safety during times of transition? , 2009, The Medical journal of Australia.

[12]  M. Vanderpump,et al.  Achieving compliance with the European Working Time Directive in a large teaching hospital: a strategic approach. , 2004, Clinical medicine.

[13]  Are weekend handovers of adequate quality for the on-call general medical team? , 2011, Clinical medicine.

[14]  Carl Fernandes,et al.  Electronic software significantly improves quality of handover in a London teaching hospital , 2009, Health Informatics J..

[15]  John Whittington,et al.  SBAR: a shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. , 2006, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.