The effects of telephone consultation and triage on healthcare use and patient satisfaction: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND In recent years there has been a growth in the use of the telephone consultation for healthcare problems. This has developed, in part, as a response to increased demand for GP and accident and emergency department care. AIM To assess the effects of telephone consultation and triage on safety, service use, and patient satisfaction. DESIGN OF STUDY We looked at randomised controlled trials, controlled studies, controlled before/after studies, and interrupted time series of telephone consultation or triage in a general healthcare setting. SETTING All healthcare settings were included but the majority of studies were in primary care. METHOD We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EPOC specialised register, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, SIGLE, and the National Research Register and checked reference lists of identified studies and review articles. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed study quality. RESULTS Nine studies met our inclusion criteria: five randomised controlled trials; one controlled trial; and three interrupted time series. Six studies compared telephone consultation with normal care; four by a doctor, one by a nurse, and one by a clinic clerk. Three of five studies found a significant decrease in visits to GPs but two found an increase in return consultations. In general at least 50% (range = 25.5-72.2%) of calls were handled by telephone consultation alone. Of seven studies reporting accident and emergency department visits, six showed no difference between the groups and one--of nurse telephone consultation--found an increase. Two studies reported deaths and found no difference between nurse telephone consultation and normal care. CONCLUSIONS Although telephone consultation appears to have the potential to reduce GP workload, questions remain about its effect on service use. Further rigorous evaluation is needed with emphasis on service use, safety, cost, and patient satisfaction.

[1]  H. Moriarty,et al.  Mystery shopping in health service evaluation. , 2003, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[2]  James Munro,et al.  Evaluation of NHS Direct first wave sites Second interim report to the Department of Health , 1998 .

[3]  D. Schriger,et al.  Effect of visual cues, vital signs, and protocols on triage: a prospective randomized crossover trial. , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  Steve George Editiorial. NHS Direct audited;customer satisfaction, but at what price? , 2002 .

[5]  P. Vedsted,et al.  The effect of an out-of-hours reform on attendance at casualty wards. The Danish example. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[6]  E Glucksman,et al.  Computer assisted assessment and advice for “non-serious” 999 ambulance service callers: the potential impact on ambulance despatch , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.

[7]  C J McDonald,et al.  After-hours Telephone Access to Physicians With Access to Computerized Medical Records: Experience in an Inner-city General Medicine Clinic , 1985, Medical care.

[8]  C. Warwick The new NHS: modern dependable , 1998 .

[9]  T. Carruth,et al.  After-hours telephone coverage: the application of an area-wide telephone triage and advice system for pediatric practices. , 1993, Pediatrics.

[10]  Daphne Russell,et al.  Nurse telephone triage for same day appointments in general practice: multiple interrupted time series trial of effect on workload and costs , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  S. Wyke,et al.  Telephone consultations to manage requests for same-day appointments: a randomised controlled trial in two practices. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[12]  Helen Smith,et al.  Observational study of a general practice out of hours cooperative: measures of activity , 1997, BMJ.

[13]  B. Linn,et al.  Effectiveness of an Ambulatory Care Telephone Service in Reducing Drop-In Visits and Improving Satisfaction With Care , 1982, Medical care.

[14]  B Edwards,et al.  Telephone triage: how experienced nurses reach decisions. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[15]  J. Dale,et al.  Telephone triage--how good are the decisions? (Part 2). , 1998, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[16]  Steve George,et al.  NHS Direct audited , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  R. A. Horne,et al.  A study of telephone advice in managing out-of-hours calls. , 1987, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[18]  J. Dale,et al.  Primary care: nurse-led telephone triage and advice out-of-hours. , 1998, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[19]  Joanne Turnbull,et al.  Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial , 1998 .

[20]  G A Lamb,et al.  Controlled clinical trial of pediatric telephone protocols. , 1979, Pediatrics.

[21]  J. E. George,et al.  Emergency department telephone advice. , 1995, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[22]  L. Baraff,et al.  Caller satisfaction with after-hours telephone advice: nurse advice service versus on-call pediatricians. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[23]  E. Ernst,et al.  Assessment of therapeutic safety in systematic reviews: literature review , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  A. Glasper,et al.  Overnight calls in primary care: randomised controlled trial of management using nurse telephone consultation , 1999, BMJ.

[25]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Impact of NHS Direct on demand for immediate care: observational study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  How helpful is NHS Direct? Postal survey of callers , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  N. Mathers,et al.  The effect of GP telephone triage on numbers seeking same-day appointments. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.