Methodology for Managing the Effect of Uncertainty in Simulation-Based Design

Simulation-based design has become an inherent part of multidisciplinary design as simulation tools provide designers with a e exible and computationally efe cient means to explore the interrelationships among various disciplines. Complicationsarisewhen thesimulation programsmay havedeviationsassociated with inputparameters (external uncertainties ), as well as internal uncertainties due to the inaccuracies of the simulation tools or system models. Theseuncertainties will have a great ine uenceon design negotiationsbetween variousdisciplines and may force designers to make conservative decisions. An integrated methodology for propagating and mitigating the effect of uncertainties is proposed. Two approaches, namely, the extreme condition approach and the statistical approach, are developed to propagate the effect of uncertainties across a design system comprising interrelated subsystem analyses. Using the extreme condition approach, an interval of the output from a chain of simulations is obtained, whereas the statistical approach provides statistical estimates of the output. An uncertainty mitigation strategy based on the principles of robust design is proposed. The methodology is presented using an illustrative simulation chain and is verie ed using the case study of a six-link function-generator linkage design.

[1]  Kathryn B. Laskey.  Model uncertainty: theory and practical implications , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[2]  Kevin Otto,et al.  SYSTEM-LEVEL ROBUSTNESS THROUGH INTEGRATED MODELING , 1999 .

[3]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling & Analysis , 1991 .

[4]  Carl D. Sorensen,et al.  A general approach for robust optimal design , 1993 .

[5]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .

[6]  N. Siu,et al.  Proceedings of workshop I in advanced topics in risk and reliability analysis. Model uncertainty: Its characterization and quantification , 1994 .

[7]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling and Analysis , 1982 .

[8]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream , 1992 .

[9]  Donald R. Houser,et al.  A ROBUST OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURE WITH VARIATIONS ON DESIGN VARIABLES AND CONSTRAINTS , 1995 .

[10]  Wei Chen,et al.  Quality utility : a Compromise Programming approach to robust design , 1999 .

[11]  P. A. Newman,et al.  Approach for uncertainty propagation and robust design in CFD using sensitivity derivatives , 2001 .

[12]  Leonie Kohl,et al.  Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments , 2000 .

[13]  Palle Thoft-Christensen,et al.  Reliability and optimization of structural systems '90 : proceedings of the 3rd IFIP WG 7.5 Conference, Berkeley, California, USA, March 26-28, 1990 , 1991 .

[14]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[15]  Alan R. Parkinson,et al.  A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design Applied to the Design of a Control System , 1993 .

[16]  Wei Chen,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Modeling Feasibility Robustness in Engineering Design , 2000 .

[17]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Anti-optimization technique for structural design under load uncertainties , 1998 .

[18]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Multiobjective Collaborative Optimization , 1997 .

[19]  Robert L. Norton,et al.  Design of machinery : an introduction to the synthesis and analysis of mechanisms and machines , 1999 .

[20]  田口 玄一,et al.  Taguchi on robust technology development : bringing quality engineering upstream , 1993 .

[21]  John E. Renaud,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN SUBJECT TO UNCERTAINTY , 1998 .

[22]  Allen C. Ward,et al.  The RANGE family of propagation operations for intervals on simultaneous linear equations , 1995, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[23]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[24]  Bruce H. Wilson,et al.  Physical Programming for Computational Control , 1998 .

[25]  Achille Messac,et al.  Physical programming - Effective optimization for computational design , 1996 .

[26]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  A procedure for robust design: Minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors , 1996 .

[27]  P. K. Subramanyan.  Kinematics and Mechanisms , 2000 .

[28]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  NON-HIERARCHIC SYSTEM DECOMPOSITION IN STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION , 1992 .

[29]  R. W. Mayne,et al.  Probabilistic Optimal Design Using Successive Surrogate Probability Density Functions , 1993 .

[30]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[31]  C. Ireland.  Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments , 1964 .

[32]  David R. Oakley,et al.  Multidisciplinary Stochastic Optimization , 1995 .

[33]  Ronald F. Perry,et al.  Simulation: A Problem-Solving Approach , 1989 .

[34]  Wei Chen,et al.  A Probabilistic-Based Design Model for Achieving Flexibility in Design , 1999 .

[35]  C. H. Suh,et al.  Kinematics and mechanisms design , 1978 .

[36]  William Manners.  Classification and Analysis of Uncertainty in Structural Systems , 1991 .

[37]  Wei Chen,et al.  A Most Probable Point-Based Method for Efficient Uncertainty Analysis , 2001 .

[38]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[39]  Kroo Ilan,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization Methods for Aircraft Preliminary Design , 1994 .

[40]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[41]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  An algorithm for solving the system-level problem in multilevel optimization , 1994 .

[42]  M. Stein.  Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling , 1987 .