Flexible resource use strategies of a central-place forager experiencing dynamic risk and opportunity

Background Movement decisions made in space and time define how wildlife meet competing extrinsic and intrinsic demands to maximize fitness. Differential selection of resource patches provides one example of how to measure how animals balance conflicting demands. We hypothesized that individual spatial selection of patch types between dynamic seasons would signify flexible strategies used to minimize risk and optimize foraging efforts. Methods We used data collected from GPS loggers on golden-mantled ground squirrels (Callospermophilus lateralis) to model selection or avoidance of resources in two seasons of seed availability and one season in which no seeds were available. Movement decisions were measured in short-term discrete time intervals using high resolution location data. Selection or avoidance of specific resource features that entail fitness consequences were then assessed using resource selection functions. Results Seasonality of food availability, food type, and spatial distribution of food largely influenced how individuals selected resources within their home ranges. Overall, when seeds were available, individuals mediated risks of predation and loss of food by using patches closer to refuge and selected intermediate distances to the burrow. When food was not available, individuals minimized exposure to heightened risk by staying close to the burrow and avoiding riskier patch types. Conclusions Results indicate that individuals used flexible, dynamic strategies to select habitat patches which may allow them to balance conflicting seasonal demands. Advances in GPS technology for research of small mammals provide greater insight into how prey species in high risk environments differentially use resources to minimize risk and maintain fitness.

[1]  J. Verdolin Meta-analysis of foraging and predation risk trade-offs in terrestrial systems , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  Burt P. Kotler Behavioral resource depression and decaying perceived risk of predation in two species of coexisting gerbils , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[4]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use–availability designs , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Alexandra J. R. Carthey,et al.  Foraging in groups affects giving-up densities: solo foragers quit sooner , 2015, Oecologia.

[7]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Foraging to balance conflicting demands: novel insights from grasshoppers under predation risk , 1997 .

[8]  Cameron L. Aldridge,et al.  Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[9]  J. Marcus Rowcliffe,et al.  Food acquisition and predator avoidance in a Neotropical rodent , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  R. Sikes,et al.  2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education , 2016, Journal of Mammalogy.

[11]  M. Hough,et al.  Resource Selection Habitat Model for Northern Flying Squirrels in the Black Hills, South Dakota , 2009 .

[12]  Caribou, water, and ice – fine-scale movements of a migratory arctic ungulate in the context of climate change , 2016, Movement ecology.

[13]  S. L. Lima Initiation and termination of daily feeding in dark-eyed juncos: influences of predation risk and energy reserves , 1988 .

[14]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Effect of an Invasive Plant and Moonlight on Rodent Foraging Behavior in a Coastal Dune Ecosystem , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  B. Barton,et al.  Covariance between predation risk and nutritional preferences confounds interpretations of giving-up density experiments. , 2018, Ecology.

[16]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation , 2004 .

[17]  G. Ruxton,et al.  Choice of Foraging Area with Respect to Predation Risk in Redshanks: The Effects of Weather and Predator Activity , 1999 .

[18]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[19]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[20]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[21]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[22]  Fritz Gerhardt,et al.  FOOD PILFERING IN LARDER-HOARDING RED SQUIRRELS (TAMIASCIURUS HUDSONICUS) , 2005 .

[23]  M. V. Price,et al.  Depletion of seed patches by Merriam’s kangaroo rats: are GUD assumptions met? , 2001 .

[24]  J. Kie,et al.  Sexual segregation in North American elk: the role of density dependence , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[25]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[26]  Chuan Yan,et al.  Scatter-hoarding rodents are better pilferers than larder-hoarders , 2018, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  P. Banks,et al.  A practical guide to avoid giving up on giving-up densities , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  K. M. Stewart,et al.  Spatial distributions and resource selection by mule deer in an arid environment: Responses to provision of water , 2015 .

[29]  M. Bowers,et al.  Variation in giving-up densities of foraging chipmunks (Tamias striatus) and squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) , 1993 .

[30]  L. Dill,et al.  Experimental addition of cover lowers the perception of danger and increases reproduction in meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) , 2017 .

[31]  A. Derocher,et al.  Habitat selection by arctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus parryii) , 2010 .

[32]  Todd W. Arnold Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion , 2010 .

[33]  Rodney X. Sturdivant,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression: Hosmer/Applied Logistic Regression , 2005 .

[34]  D. Derryberry,et al.  A graphical framework for model selection criteria and significance tests: refutation, confirmation and ecology , 2017 .

[35]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Scale for resource selection functions , 2006 .

[36]  D. Kramer,et al.  The influence of distance to burrow on flight initiation distance in the woodchuck, Marmota monax , 1996 .

[37]  S. B. Wall Seed Fate Pathways of Antelope Bitterbrush: Dispersal by Seed-Caching Yellow Pine Chipmunks , 1994 .

[38]  John M. Fryxell,et al.  The scale-dependent impact of wolf predation risk on resource selection by three sympatric ungulates , 2008, Oecologia.

[39]  S. B. Wall,et al.  Asymmetrical cache pilfering between yellow pine chipmunks and golden-mantled ground squirrels , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Patch use predation risk. II : A test with fox squirrels, Sciurus niger , 1992 .

[41]  Graham H. Pyke,et al.  Optimal Foraging: A Selective Review of Theory and Tests , 1977, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[42]  Harvest Rates and Escape Speeds in Two Coexisting Species of Montane Ground Squirrels , 1995 .

[43]  T. Johnson,et al.  Selection of food patches by sympatric herbivores in response to concealment and distance from a refuge , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[44]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  SPEED AND TIME-ENERGY BUDGET FOR LOCOMOTION IN GOLDEN-MANTLED GROUND SQUIRRELS' , 1989 .

[45]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  Linking resource selection and step selection models for habitat preferences in animals. , 2017, Ecology.

[46]  F. Bozinovic,et al.  Flight initiation distance is differentially sensitive to the costs of staying and leaving food patches in a small-mammal prey , 2009 .

[47]  E. Werner,et al.  Interaction Between Food Availability and Predation Mortality Mediated by Adaptive Behavior , 1995 .

[48]  S. B. Vander Wall,et al.  Linking summer foraging to winter survival in yellow pine chipmunks (Tamias amoenus) , 2008, Oecologia.

[49]  S. L. Lima Maximizing feeding efficiency and minimizing time exposed to predators: a trade-off in the black-capped chickadee , 1985, Oecologia.

[50]  W. Porter,et al.  Behavior and nutritional condition buffer a large‐bodied endotherm against direct and indirect effects of climate , 2014 .

[51]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Effects of foraging behavior and spatial scale on diet selectivity: A test with fox squirrels , 1995 .

[52]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[53]  Daniel H. Thornton,et al.  The balancing act of foraging: mammalian herbivores trade-off multiple risks when selecting food patches , 2017, Oecologia.

[54]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Development and testing of phenologically driven grizzly bear habitat models , 2003 .

[55]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[56]  L. Ruggiero,et al.  Forest habitat associations of the golden-mantled ground squirrel: Implications for fuels management , 2006 .

[57]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[58]  Joshua J. Millspaugh,et al.  Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates , 1999 .

[59]  P. Nonacs State dependent behavior and the Marginal Value Theorem , 2001 .

[60]  S. Giannoni,et al.  Characterization and selection of microhabitat of Microcavia australis (Rodentia: Caviidae): first data in a rocky habitat in the hyperarid Monte Desert of Argentina , 2014 .

[61]  Jane E. Norman,et al.  Direct and indirect cues of predatory risk and patch use by fox squirrels and thirteen-lined ground squirrels , 1998 .

[62]  S. B. Wall The influence of environmental conditions on cache recovery and cache pilferage by yellow pine chipmunks (Tamias amoenus) and deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) , 2000 .

[63]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: Foraging under predation risk , 1999 .

[64]  A. Matthews Changes in fine-scale movement and foraging patterns of common wombats along a snow-depth gradient. , 2010 .

[65]  Anthony Joern,et al.  Complex variation in habitat selection strategies among individuals driven by extrinsic factors , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[66]  Burt P. Kotler Risk of predation and the structure of desert rodent communities , 1984 .

[67]  M. W. Perkins,et al.  HABITAT USE OF FOX SQUIRRELS IN SOUTHWESTERN GEORGIA , 2004 .

[68]  R. Sikes,et al.  Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the Use of Wild Mammals in Research , 2007 .

[69]  Floris M. van Beest,et al.  Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[70]  D. Simberloff The Guild Concept and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 1991 .

[71]  S. B. Wall MASTING IN ANIMAL-DISPERSED PINES FACILITATES SEED DISPERSAL , 2002 .

[72]  J. Koprowski,et al.  Effect of heterogeneity in burn severity on Mexican fox squirrels following the return of fire , 2013 .

[73]  J. Orrock,et al.  CORRIDORS AND OLFACTORY PREDATOR CUES AFFECT SMALL MAMMAL BEHAVIOR , 2005 .

[74]  Angela K. Fuller,et al.  Movement paths reveal scale-dependent habitat decisions by Canada lynx , 2010 .

[75]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Grizzly bears and forestry I: Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in west-central Alberta, Canada , 2004 .

[76]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities , 1974, Science.

[77]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[78]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  APPREHENSION AND TIME ALLOCATION IN GERBILS: THE EFFECTS OF PREDATORY RISK AND ENERGETIC STATE , 2004 .