Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI

With substantial efforts in ubiquitous computing, ICT4D, and sustainable interaction design, among others, HCI is increasingly engaging with matters of social change that go beyond the immediate qualities of interaction. In doing so, HCI takes on scientific and moral concerns. This paper explores the potential for feminist social science to contribute to and potentially benefit from HCI's rising interest in social change. It describes how feminist contributions to debates in the philosophy of science have helped clarify relationships among objectivity, values, data collection and interpretation, and social consequences. Feminists have proposed and implemented strategies to pursue scientific and moral agendas together and with equal rigor. In this paper, we assess the epistemologies, methodologies, and methods of feminist social science relative to prior and ongoing research efforts in HCI. We conclude by proposing an outline of a feminist HCI methodology.

[1]  Nancy A. Naples.  Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis, and Activist Research , 2003 .

[2]  Jalna Hanmer,et al.  Well-founded fear : a community study of violence to women , 1984 .

[3]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse , 2007, CHI.

[4]  Larry Laudan,et al.  Science and Values , 1986 .

[5]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[6]  Drucilla K. Barker.  Feminist Philosophy of Science , 1998 .

[7]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development , 2010, CHI.

[8]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[9]  Raimo Tuomela,et al.  Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research , 1999 .

[10]  C. DiSalvo,et al.  Design and the Construction of Publics , 2009, Design Issues.

[11]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Reflective HCI: towards a critical technical practice , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[12]  J. Sprague,et al.  Quality and quantity: Reconstructing feminist methodology , 1989 .

[13]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology , 2004 .

[14]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Empathy and experience in HCI , 2008, CHI.

[15]  Jeffrey Bardzell,et al.  Interaction criticism and aesthetics , 2009, CHI.

[16]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[17]  D Argeri,et al.  Science and Values , 1936, Nature.

[18]  E. Vesterinen,et al.  Affective Computing , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[19]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Implications for design , 2006, CHI.

[20]  Helen E. Longino,et al.  Can There Be A Feminist Science? , 1987, Hypatia.

[21]  L. Mcdowell,et al.  Doing Gender: Feminism, Feminists and Research Methods in Human Geography , 1992 .

[22]  Richard W. Miller.  Aesthetics and ethics: Three versions of objectivity: aesthetic, moral, and scientific , 1998 .

[23]  Avrum Stroll,et al.  Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy , 2000 .

[24]  L. J. Anthony,et al.  The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science , 2002 .

[25]  S. Harding.  Is Science Multicultural?: Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies , 1998 .

[26]  Victor J. Papanek,et al.  Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change , 1972 .

[27]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Creating Conditions for Participation: Conflicts and Resources in Systems Development , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  S. Harding.  The feminist standpoint theory reader : intellectual andpolitical controversies , 2004 .

[29]  Tony Fry.  A new design philosophy : an introduction to defuturing , 1999 .

[30]  Mark Zachry,et al.  An Interview with Susan Leigh Star , 2008 .

[31]  Rhoda K. Unger,et al.  Feminist Methods in Social Research. , 1993 .

[32]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[33]  M. Kyng,et al.  Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge , 1987 .

[34]  Bonnie E. John,et al.  CHAPTER 4 – Information Processing and Skilled Behavior , 2003 .

[35]  Paul Dourish,et al.  How HCI interprets the probes , 2007, CHI.

[36]  Harold Kincaid,et al.  Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences , 1995 .

[37]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Reflective HCI: articulating an agenda for critical practice , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[38]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  Thoughtful interaction design , 2004 .

[39]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  The rogue in the lovely black dress: intimacy in world of warcraft , 2010, CHI.

[40]  Michael Silberstein,et al.  The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science , 2002 .

[41]  Richard I. Wark,et al.  Feminism and methodology: Edited by Sandra Harding Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1987, 193 pp., $10.95 (paper), $29.95 (cloth) , 1989 .

[42]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Moving on from Weiser's Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences , 2006, UbiComp.

[43]  J. Levinson,et al.  Aesthetics and ethics : essays at the intersection , 1998 .

[44]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[45]  Judith A. Cook,et al.  Knowledge and Women's Interests: Issues of Epistemology and Methodology in Feminist Sociological Research* , 1986 .

[46]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[47]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Understanding affective interaction: Emotion, engagement, and internet videos , 2009, 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops.

[48]  Mark Blythe.  Pastiche scenarios , 2004, INTR.

[49]  DourishPaul,et al.  Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision , 2007 .

[50]  Nasser Peyghambarian.  Thanks for the memory , 1995, Nature.

[51]  S. Harding.  Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology : What is « Strong Objectivity? » , 1992 .

[52]  M. Mcneil.  Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1992 .

[53]  E. Mcmullin.  Values in Science , 1982, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[54]  Donna Haraway,et al.  Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1991 .

[55]  Maddy Coy,et al.  Feminist Theory , 2001 .

[56]  J. Sprague,et al.  Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging Differences , 2005 .

[57]  B. John.  Information Processing and Skilled Behavior , 2003 .

[58]  N.E. WHITEHEAD,et al.  Values in science , 1985, Nature.

[59]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[60]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI , 2010, CHI.

[61]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[62]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[63]  Richard S. Rudner.  The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments , 1953, Philosophy of Science.

[64]  Ann Light,et al.  Performing Charlotte: A Technique to Bridge Cultures in Participatory Design , 2010, Int. J. Sociotechnology Knowl. Dev..