Understanding the neurophysiological representation patterns of non-verifiable mental action verbs: an ERP investigation

Imaging has revealed that brain activation of verbs with verifiable products (‘throw, kick’) activate language areas as well as the motor cortex responsible for the performance of the action described. An exploratory comparison of eye related verbs with no verifiable products (‘observe’) to mouth related verbs with verifiable products (‘shout’) has revealed a similar activation pattern. Thus in order to further study mental action verbs with no verifiable products, the present two-part study used words that were suitable across two modalities (e.g. you can ‘perceive’ both through vision and audition) and compare them to themselves under differing contexts of auditory and visual verbs so as to eliminate any word characteristics differences, as well as explored the two modalities directly. The primary purpose was to delineate whether associative learning or the mirror systems theory might better account for the acquisition of this unique subclass of verbs. Results suggest that Mirror systems theory more likely accounts for the observed cognitive processing differences between the two verbs.

[1]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[2]  Laura K. Cirelli,et al.  Do You ‘See’ What I ‘See’? Differentiation of Visual Action Words , 2014, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[3]  三浦 京子,et al.  講演2 ハリー・ポッターと賢者の石 Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone : 私は誰? 錬金術的解釈〈象徴を手がかりに〉 , 2012 .

[4]  J. Guridi,et al.  The mirror system, theory of mind and Parkinson's disease , 2011, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[5]  T. Nazir,et al.  Interwoven Functionality of the Brain's Action and Language Systems , 2010 .

[6]  K. James,et al.  Auditory verb perception recruits motor systems in the developing brain: an fMRI investigation. , 2009, Developmental science.

[7]  J. Dickinson,et al.  Impact of mental operation instructions. , 2008, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[8]  Kim Wilson,et al.  The Benefits of Sensorimotor Knowledge: Body-Object Interaction Facilitates Semantic Processing , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Account of Criterion Shifts in the Lexical Decision Task. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[10]  M. Grossman,et al.  Reversal of the concreteness effect for verbs in patients with semantic dementia. , 2007, Neuropsychology.

[11]  V. Rajmohan,et al.  Mirror neuron system , 2007, Indian journal of psychiatry.

[12]  B. Kotchoubey,et al.  Event-related potentials, cognition, and behavior: A biological approach , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[13]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: the role of phonotactic probability and word frequency , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[14]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain mechanisms linking language and action , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Guy Dove,et al.  Linking Brainwaves to the Brain: An ERP Primer , 2005, Developmental neuropsychology.

[16]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Analysis of the Effects of Aging on Recognition Memory Journal of Memory and Language , 2003 .

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Involved in the Recognition of Actions Performed by Nonconspecifics: An fMRI Study , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Masked priming : the state of the art , 2003 .

[20]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[21]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  Factors underlying masked priming effects in competitive network models of visual word recognition , 2003 .

[22]  R. Hari,et al.  Viewing Lip Forms Cortical Dynamics , 2002, Neuron.

[23]  S. Luck,et al.  How does attention attenuate target-distractor interference in vision?. Evidence from magnetoencephalographic recordings. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  H. Bokura,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Walking or Talking?: Behavioral and Neurophysiological Correlates of Action Verb Processing , 2001, Brain and Language.

[26]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  M. C. Levorato,et al.  The semantic structure of vision verbs: A psycholinguistic investigation of Italian , 2000 .

[30]  R. Hari,et al.  Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Letitia R. Naigles Manipulating the input: Studies in mental verb acquisition. , 2000 .

[32]  J. Jonides,et al.  Perception, cognition, and language : essays in honor of Henry and Lila Gleitman , 2000 .

[33]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Dynamics of cortical representation for action , 1999 .

[35]  V Bettinardi,et al.  The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  J. Coull Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology , 1998, Progress in Neurobiology.

[37]  A. N. Haendiges,et al.  Verb Retrieval in Aphasia. 2. Relationship to Sentence Processing , 1997, Brain and Language.

[38]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[40]  P. Holcomb Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[41]  P. Boeck,et al.  An implicit theory of intelligence-related mental activities , 1991 .

[42]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: Tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[44]  F. Macar,et al.  An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and other non-linguistic contexts. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[45]  Laura Martin “Eskimo Words for Snow”: A Case Study in the Genesis and Decay of an Anthropological Example , 1986 .

[46]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[47]  Vaughan,et al.  The relationship of brain activity to scalp recordings of event-related potentials. , 1969 .

[48]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[49]  W. Walter,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation : An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain , 1964, Nature.

[50]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[51]  H. Gastaut,et al.  EEG changes during cinematographic presentation; moving picture activation of the EEG. , 1954, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.