Optimizing hydrogen transportation system for mobility by minimizing the cost of transportation via compressed gas truck in North Rhine-Westphalia

Abstract This study develops a method to identify the minimum cost of establishing hydrogen infrastructure using a mono-objective linear optimization. It focuses on minimizing both the capital and operation costs of hydrogen transportation. This includes costs associated with the establishment of storage and compression facilities as well as transportation links. The overarching goal of the study is therefore to build a cost-efficient transportation network using compressed gas trucks for mobility and to apply it to the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia by 2050. It is assumed that hydrogen production will be established by 2050 and, based on excess electricity from wind energy in North Rhine-Westphalia and the surrounding areas, limited by the projected installed wind installed capacity by 2050. Hydrogen is then distributed as a compressed gas, depending on the hydrogen demand of a given year, for each NUTS 3 district of North Rhine-Westphalia in 2030 and 2050. The results show that the hydrogen demand on the region, which increases from 2030 to 2050, has an impact on how and at which flow hydrogen demand is transported from the production nodes to the different distribution hubs. In 2050, hydrogen is predominantly transported and stored between the storage nodes and the distribution hubs at a high-pressure level of 500 and 540 bar, whilst it is mainly transported at 250 and 350 bar in 2030. Production is predominantly found to be transported at high pressure for both years and located in the region in 2030, whereas imports from the south and north are required in 2050.

[1]  D. Stolten,et al.  GIS-based scenario calculations for a nationwide German hydrogen pipeline infrastructure , 2013 .

[2]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Effect of tariffs on the performance and economic benefits of PV-coupled battery systems , 2016 .

[3]  Aristide F. Massardo,et al.  Thermo-economic comparison of hydrogen and hydro-methane produced from hydroelectric energy for land transportation , 2015 .

[4]  Thomas Hamacher,et al.  Model-based techno-economic evaluation of an electricity storage system based on Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers , 2017 .

[5]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Power-to-Gas: Electrolyzers as an alternative to network expansion – An example from a distribution system operator , 2018 .

[6]  Sohrab Effati,et al.  A global linearization approach to solve nonlinear nonsmooth constrained programming problems , 2010 .

[7]  J. Ogden,et al.  Renewable and low carbon hydrogen for California-Modeling the long term evolution of fuel infrastructure using a quasi-spatial TIMES model , 2013 .

[8]  S. Rahmouni,et al.  Prospects and Analysis of Hydrogen Production from Renewable Electricity Sources in Algeria , 2015 .

[9]  W. Fichtner,et al.  The future role of Power-to-Gas in the energy transition: Regional and local techno-economic analyses in Baden-Württemberg , 2018 .

[10]  Matteo C. Romano,et al.  Power-to-gas plants and gas turbines for improved wind energy dispatchability: Energy and economic assessment , 2015 .

[11]  Jens Oluf Jensen,et al.  The energy efficiency of onboard hydrogen storage , 2007 .

[12]  Serge Domenech,et al.  Spatial-based Approach of the Hydrogen Supply Chain in the Midi-Pyrénées Region, France , 2014 .

[13]  Zhenhong Lin,et al.  A method for determining the optimal delivered hydrogen pressure for fuel cell electric vehicles , 2018 .

[14]  Christina Wulf,et al.  Building an optimal hydrogen transportation system for mobility, focus on minimizing the cost of transportation via truck , 2017 .

[15]  Christopher Yang,et al.  Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode , 2007 .

[16]  Mohamed-Mahmoud Memmah,et al.  Time development of new hydrogen transmission pipeline networks for France , 2014 .

[17]  Thomas E. Drennen,et al.  Pathways to a hydrogen future , 2007 .

[18]  Marianne Mintz,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Hydrogen Delivery via Pipeline, Tube‐Trailer, LIQUID Tanker and Methanation‐Natural Gas Grid , 2016 .

[19]  Ioannis A. Papazoglou,et al.  Integrated framework for the design of pipeline systems using stochastic optimisation and GIS tools , 2012 .

[20]  Michael Kuby,et al.  The deviation-flow refueling location model for optimizing a network of refueling stations , 2012 .

[21]  Martin K. Patel,et al.  Techno-economic implications of the electrolyser technology and size for power-to-gas systems , 2016 .

[22]  Peter Wasserscheid,et al.  Seasonal storage and alternative carriers: A flexible hydrogen supply chain model , 2017 .

[23]  Nigel P. Brandon,et al.  Optimal transition towards a large-scale hydrogen infrastructure for the transport sector: The case , 2011 .

[24]  D. Stojić,et al.  Hydrogen generation from water electrolysis—possibilities of energy saving , 2003 .

[25]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Design and operation of a future hydrogen supply chain: Multi-period model , 2009 .

[26]  John A. Turner,et al.  Sustainable Hydrogen Production , 2004, Science.