Uncertainty in sewer sediment deposit modelling: Detailed vs simplified modelling approaches

Abstract The paper presents the results of a study in which the uncertainty levels associated with a detailed and a simplified/parsimonious sewer sediment modelling approach have been compared. The detailed approach used an Infoworks CS sewer network model combined with a user developed sediment transport code and the simplified approach used a conceptual sewer flow and quality model. The two approaches have been applied to a single case study sewer network and the simulation results compared. The case study was selected as moderate storm events had occurred during a 2 year rainfall and sewer flow monitoring period. Flooding had been observed and this was thought to be caused by significant solids accumulation in the sewer network. As a result sediment deposit measurements were carried out over a 6 month period. Model simulations were made of this period and predictions obtained of sediment deposit location and depth. The uncertainty analysis of both modelling approaches was carried out using Monte Carlo based computational methods. This was a limitation for the detailed approach with regards to computational time. Use of the simplified model was not constrained by this issue and so a more conventional assessment of the uncertainty was possible. The simplified approach, due to its structure, only provided a temporal estimate of uncertainty at the final section of the catchment. The detailed approach enabled an assessment of uncertainty at an individual pipe scale but only at the end of the simulation period. A comparison of the uncertainty estimations from both methods at the final section of the catchment and the end of the simulation period indicated comparable values of predicted uncertainty. Therefore a complementary use of both approaches would allow reasonably comparable estimations of levels of uncertainty at both a spatial and temporal scale. The use of such modelling approaches may provide a useful decision-making tool for sewer system management.

[1]  P. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Fast, simultaneous simulation of the integrated urban wastewater system using mechanistic surrogate models. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  R M Ashley,et al.  Estimation of uncertainty in long term combined sewer sediment behaviour predictions, a UK case study. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  Teresa B. Culver,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis for Watershed Modeling Using Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation with Multiple Calibration Measures , 2008 .

[4]  Roger Alexander Falconer Water Quality Modelling , 1992 .

[5]  Giorgio Mannina,et al.  Separate and combined sewer systems: a long-term modelling approach. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  Richard Ashley,et al.  Estimation of Uncertainty in Long-Term Sewer Sediment Predictions Using a Response Database , 2010 .

[7]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[8]  Michel Desbordes,et al.  Urban Runoff Pollution , 1986 .

[9]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  G. Freni,et al.  Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology. , 2008, Water research.

[11]  Adrian J. Saul,et al.  Erosion of Sediment Beds in Sewers: Model Development , 1999 .

[12]  T. M. Parchure,et al.  Erosion of soft cohesive sediment deposits , 1985 .

[13]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  A practical protocol for calibration of nutrient removal wastewater treatment models , 2011 .

[14]  Jean-Luc Bertrand-Krajewski Modélisation du transport solide en réseau d'assainissement unitaire : le modèle HYPOCRAS , 1993 .

[15]  Guido Vaes,et al.  Emission predictions with a multi-linear reservoir model , 1999 .

[16]  Søren Liedtke Thorndahl,et al.  Event based uncertainty assessment in urban drainage modelling applying the GLUE methodology , 2008 .

[17]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[18]  R Ashley,et al.  Sewer solids-20 years of investigation. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[19]  P. Willems,et al.  Probabilistic emission and immission modelling: case-study of the combined sewer-WWTP-receiving water system at Dessel (Belgium). , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  Peter Ackers,et al.  Sediment Transport: New Approach and Analysis , 1973 .

[21]  Patrick Willems,et al.  Parsimonious Model for Combined Sewer Overflow Pollution , 2004 .

[22]  Robert Banasiak,et al.  The erosion behaviour of biologically active sewer sediment deposits: observations from a laboratory study. , 2005, Water research.

[23]  G Chebbo,et al.  Stormwater quality modelling in combined sewers: calibration and uncertainty analysis. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[24]  David Wotherspoon,et al.  The movement of cohesive sediment in a large combined sewer , 1994 .

[25]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Urban runoff modelling uncertainty: Comparison among Bayesian and pseudo-Bayesian methods , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  David Butler,et al.  SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT IN URBAN DRAINAGE CATCHMENTS , 1995 .

[27]  Sylvie Barraud,et al.  Uncertainties, performance indicators and decision aid applied to stormwater facilities , 2002 .

[28]  G. Viviani,et al.  An urban drainage stormwater quality model model development and uncertainty quantification , 2010 .

[29]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty , 1987 .

[30]  J L Bertrand-Krajewski,et al.  Long term monitoring of sewer sediment accumulation and flushing experiments in a man-entry sewer. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[31]  M Klootwijk,et al.  Detailed observation and measurement of sewer sediment erosion under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[32]  Daniel Wallach,et al.  Using a Bayesian approach to parameter estimation; comparison of the GLUE and MCMC methods , 2002 .

[33]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[34]  E. Ristenpart,et al.  Sediment properties and their changes in a sewer , 1995 .

[35]  Adrian J. Saul,et al.  The first foul flush in combined sewers: an investigation of the causes , 2000 .

[36]  P. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Real time control of the integrated urban wastewater system using simultaneously simulating surrogate models. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[37]  G. Freni,et al.  Comparison between a detailed and a simplified integrated model for the assessment of urban drainage environmental impact on an ephemeral river , 2008 .

[38]  Keith Beven,et al.  So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent , 2008 .

[39]  G. Freni,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of sewer sediment erosion modelling , 2008 .

[40]  P. Willems Quantification and relative comparison of different types of uncertainties in sewer water quality modeling. , 2008, Water research.

[41]  Rasmus Wiuff Transport of suspended material in open and submerged streams , 1985 .

[42]  E Lindblom,et al.  Comparative uncertainty analysis of copper loads in stormwater systems using GLUE and grey-box modeling. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[43]  P. Willems,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for river quality modelling , 2004 .

[44]  R. F. Scott,et al.  Expansion and Upgrading of Columbus, OH WWTPs to Advanced Wastewater Treatment , 1992 .

[45]  A. Bachoc,et al.  Trunk Sewer Clogging Development – Description and Solutions , 1992 .

[46]  W. Rauch,et al.  Assessing uncertainties in urban drainage models , 2012 .

[47]  Philippe Quevauviller,et al.  The Water Framework Directive , 2008 .

[48]  Giorgio Mannina,et al.  Receiving water quality assessment: comparison between simplified and detailed integrated urban modelling approaches. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.