Morphometric Description of the Wandering Behavior in Drosophila Larvae: A Phenotypic Analysis of K + Channel Mutants

Genetic dissection in Drosophila has provided insights into the molecular mechanisms of K + channel subunits that underlie various physiological functions. The involvement of these subunits in animal behavior, however, is not well understood. Mutations of the Shaker (Sh), Hyperkinetic (Hk) , ether a go-go ( eag ) and quiver (qvr) genes have been found to affect the I A K + channel in different ways. The influence of individual K + channel subunits on complex larval locomotion behavior can be quantified utilizing the computer-assisted Dynamic Image Analysis System (DIAS), a motion analysis system that allows morphometric assessments. Different aspects of larval locomotion in mutants of these four genes were contrasted to those modified by the Na + channel mutations paralytic ts ( para ts ) and no-action-potential ts ( nap ts ). Genetic interactions among these K + channel mutations and the counter-balancing effects of nap ts were studied in double and triple mutant combinations. An animal at the wandering stage was allowed to crawl spontaneously on an agar substrate to extract features of the crawling pattern by DIAS. To quantify locomotion, characteristic parameters, including time spent in forward locomotion and direction change, and stride length and frequency, were computed by DIAS. Sh , Hk , and qvr mutant larvae were found to spend more than 80% of their crawling time on forward locomotion (i.e., less than 20% in direction change), in contrast to 70-74% in wild-type larvae, and less than 60% in eag mutant larvae. The synergistic effects of double and triple K + channel mutations on these parameters of locomotion suggest that each K + channel subunit contributes in a specific manner to the efficiency of locomotion.

[1]  C. Wu,et al.  Sh and eag K(+) channel subunit interaction in frog oocytes depends on level and time of expression. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[2]  A. Hilliker,et al.  A Novel Leg-Shaking Drosophila Mutant Defective in a Voltage-Gated K+ Current and Hypersensitive to Reactive Oxygen Species , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  W. Yao,et al.  Auxiliary Hyperkinetic beta subunit of K+ channels: regulation of firing properties and K+ currents in Drosophila neurons. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  M Heisenberg,et al.  Visual space from visual motion: turn integration in tethered flying Drosophila. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[5]  M. Zhao,et al.  Alterations in Frequency Coding and Activity Dependence of Excitability in Cultured Neurons of Drosophila Memory Mutants , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  C. Wu,et al.  In vivo functional role of the Drosophila hyperkinetic beta subunit in gating and inactivation of Shaker K+ channels. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[7]  R. Strauss,et al.  Larval behavior of Drosophila central complex mutants: interactions between no bridge, foraging, and Chaser. , 1996, Journal of neurogenetics.

[8]  T. Tully,et al.  Discovery of genes involved with learning and memory: an experimental synthesis of Hirschian and Benzerian perspectives. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  K. Götz,et al.  Activation phase ensures kinematic efficacy in flight-steering muscles of Drosophila melanogaster , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Chun-Fang Wu,et al.  Heteromultimeric Interactions among K+ Channel Subunits from Shaker and eag Families in Xenopus Oocytes , 1996, Neuron.

[11]  A. Hilliker,et al.  Genetic analysis of oxygen defense mechanisms in Drosophila melanogaster and identification of a novel behavioural mutant with a Shaker phenotype. , 1996, Genome.

[12]  B. Ganetzky,et al.  A potassium channel beta subunit related to the aldo-keto reductase superfamily is encoded by the Drosophila hyperkinetic locus. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. C. Hall.  The mating of a fly. , 1994, Science.

[14]  Y. Zhong,et al.  Modulation of different K+ currents in Drosophila: a hypothetical role for the Eag subunit in multimeric K+ channels , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The active control of wing rotation by Drosophila. , 1993, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  R. Strauss,et al.  A higher control center of locomotor behavior in the Drosophila brain , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  B. S. Baker,et al.  napts , a Mutation affecting sodium channel activity in Drosophila, Is an allele of mle a regulator of X chromosome transcription , 1991, Cell.

[18]  R. Drysdale,et al.  A distinct potassium channel polypeptide encoded by the Drosophila eag locus , 1991, Science.

[19]  Y. Zhong,et al.  Alteration of four identified K+ currents in Drosophila muscle by mutations in eag , 1991, Science.

[20]  T. Casey.  Energetics of Caterpillar Locomotion: Biomechanical Constraints of a Hydraulic Skeleton , 1991, Science.

[21]  Y. Zhong,et al.  Morphological plasticity of motor axons in Drosophila mutants with altered excitability , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Strauss,et al.  Coordination of legs during straight walking and turning in Drosophila melanogaster , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  L. Salkoff,et al.  The drosophila shaker gene codes for a distinctive K+ current in a subset of neurons , 1990, Neuron.

[24]  B. Ganetzky,et al.  Altered synaptic transmission in Drosophila hyperkinetic mutants. , 1989, Journal of neurogenetics.

[25]  M. Tanouye,et al.  Multiple products of the drosophila Shaker gene may contribute to potassium channel diversity , 1988, Neuron.

[26]  O. Pongs,et al.  Shaker encodes a family of putative potassium channel proteins in the nervous system of Drosophila. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[27]  Y. Jan,et al.  Multiple potassium–channel components are produced by alternative splicing at the Shaker locus in Drosophila , 1988, Nature.

[28]  M. Heisenberg,et al.  Visual orientation in motion-blind flies is an operant behaviour , 1986, Nature.

[29]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Ecological genetics and behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster larvae in nature , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  C. Wu,et al.  Voltage clamp analysis of membrane currents in larval muscle fibers of Drosophila: alteration of potassium currents in Shaker mutants , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Tanouye,et al.  Action potentials in normal and Shaker mutant Drosophila. , 1985, Journal of neurogenetics.

[32]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Drosophila larval foraging behaviour: Developmental stages , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  B. Ganetzky,et al.  Neurogenetic analysis of potassium currents in Drosophila: synergistic effects on neuromuscular transmission in double mutants. , 1983, Journal of neurogenetics.

[34]  B. Ganetzky,et al.  Potassium currents in Drosophila: different components affected by mutations of two genes. , 1983, Science.

[35]  R. Wyman,et al.  Genetic modification of potassium channels in Drosophila Shaker mutants , 1981, Nature.

[36]  B. Ganetzky,et al.  Genetic alteration of nerve membrane excitability in temperature-sensitive paralytic mutants of Drosophila melanogaster , 1980, Nature.

[37]  Y. Jan,et al.  A Drosophila mutant with a temperature-sensitive block in nerve conduction. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Y. Jan,et al.  Two Mutations of synaptic transmission in Drosophila , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[39]  S. Benzer.  Genetic dissection of behavior. , 1973, Scientific American.

[40]  W. D. Kaplan,et al.  The behavior of four neurological mutants of Drosophila. , 1969, Genetics.

[41]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Studies in experimental behavior genetics. I. The heritability of phototaxis in a population of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1958, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[42]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  The foraging locus: behavioral tests for normal muscle movement in rover and sitter Drosophila melanogaster larvae , 2004, Genetica.

[43]  D. Soll,et al.  Morphometric description of the wandering behavior in Drosophila larvae: aberrant locomotion in Na+ and K+ channel mutants revealed by computer-assisted motion analysis. , 1997, Journal of neurogenetics.

[44]  D. Soll.  The use of computers in understanding how animal cells crawl. , 1995, International review of cytology.

[45]  C. Wu,et al.  Ionic channels in cultured Drosophila neurons. , 1993, EXS.

[46]  B. Ganetzky,et al.  Neurogenetic studies of ion channels in Drosophila. , 1992, Ion channels.

[47]  Karl Georg Götz,et al.  Search and Choice in Drosophila , 1989 .

[48]  D R Soll,et al.  "DMS," a computer-assisted system for quantitating motility, the dynamics of cytoplasmic flow, and pseudopod formation: its application to Dictyostelium chemotaxis. , 1988, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[49]  K. Götz.  Visual guidance in Drosophila. , 1980, Basic life sciences.