Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Self-other Agreement in Personality and Affectivity: the Role of Acquaintanceship, Trait Visibility, and Assumed Similarity

Self- and other-ratings on the Big Five and a comprehensive inventory of trait affect were obtained from 74 married couples, 136 dating couples, and 279 friendship dyads. With the exception of Surprise, all scales showed significant self-other agreement in all 3 samples, thereby establishing their convergent validity. Consistent with the trait visibility effect, however, the Big Five consistently yielded higher agreement correlations than did the affectivity scales. Conversely, the affective traits consistently showed stronger evidence of assumed similarity (i.e., the tendency for judges to rate others as similar to themselves) than did the Big Five. Cross-sample comparisons indicated that agreement was significantly higher in the married sample than in the other 2 groups; however, analyses of 3 potential moderators in the dating and friendship samples failed to identify the source of this acquaintanceship effect.

[1]  D. Southern,et al.  Strangers ' Ratings of the Five Robust Personality Factors : Evidence of a Surprising Convergence With Self-Report , 2001 .

[2]  J. Vaidya,et al.  The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence , 1999 .

[3]  P. Costa,et al.  Identifying causes of disagreement between self-reports and spouse ratings of personality. , 1998, Journal of personality.

[4]  G. Gallup,et al.  Attributions of Deception in Human Mating Strategies , 1997 .

[5]  D. Watson,et al.  Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: recurrent and emergent issues. , 1997, Journal of personality assessment.

[6]  D. Funder,et al.  Congruence of others' and self-judgments of personality. , 1997 .

[7]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Handbook of personality psychology. , 1997 .

[8]  M. McGue,et al.  Sex differences and nonadditivity in heritability of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire Scales. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  D. Watson,et al.  Adaptational Style and Dispositional Structure: Coping in the Context of the Five‐Factor Model , 1996 .

[10]  R. McCrae.  Social consequences of experiential openness. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Enhancing target variance in personality impressions: highlighting the person in person perception. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  D. Funder.  On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. , 1995, Psychological review.

[13]  D. Kashy,et al.  Measurement and data analytic issues in couples research. , 1995 .

[14]  E. Diener,et al.  The personality structure of affect. , 1995 .

[15]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The effect of nonindependence on significance testing in dyadic research. , 1995 .

[16]  M C Blackman,et al.  Agreement among judges of personality: interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  R. McCrae.  The Counterpoint of Personality Assessment: Self Reports and Observer Ratings , 1994, Assessment.

[18]  David Watson,et al.  The PANAS-X manual for the positive and negative affect schedule , 1994 .

[19]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consensus in interpersonal perception: acquaintance and the big five. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  O. John,et al.  Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[22]  Delroy L. Paulhus,et al.  The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. , 1992 .

[23]  D. Watson,et al.  On traits and temperament: general and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five-factor model. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[24]  John M. Jermier.  Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn: 1990, Chicago: University of Chicago press, 356 + xiv pp., $24.95, paper. By Robin M. Hogarth , 1992 .

[25]  Steven W. Duck,et al.  Studying Interpersonal Interaction , 1992 .

[26]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[27]  David Watson,et al.  Self- versus peer ratings of specific emotional traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity , 1991 .

[28]  W. Chaplin,et al.  The next generation of moderator research in personality psychology. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[29]  D. Funder,et al.  Predicting personality and behavior: a boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  D. Funder.  Global Traits: A Neo-Allportian Approach to Personality , 1991 .

[31]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  The potential nonfalsity of the false consensus effect. , 1990 .

[32]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Insights in decision making : a tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn , 1990 .

[33]  Sampo V. Paunonen,et al.  Consensus in Personality Judgments: Moderating Effects of Target-Rater Acquaintanceship and Behavior Observability , 1989 .

[34]  E. Berscheid,et al.  The Relationship Closeness Inventory : Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships , 2004 .

[35]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  D. Funder,et al.  Friends and strangers: acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  D. Funder,et al.  Profiting from controversy. Lessons from the person-situation debate. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[38]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  R. Kammann,et al.  Low accuracy in judgments of others' psychological well-being as seen from a phenomenological perspective , 1984 .

[40]  Robert R. McCrae,et al.  Consensual validation of personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and ratings. , 1982 .

[41]  Douglas T. Kenrick,et al.  Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. , 1980 .

[42]  J. S. Shrauger,et al.  Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. , 1979 .

[43]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. , 1966 .

[44]  Robert Liebendorfer.  Mind, self and society , 1960 .

[45]  L. Cronbach.  Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  G. Hartmann.  Personality traits associated with variations in happiness. , 1934 .