A Perceptual-Like Population-Coding Mechanism of Approximate Numerical Averaging

Humans possess a remarkable ability to rapidly form coarse estimations of numerical averages. This ability is important for making decisions that are based on streams of numerical or value-based information, as well as for preference formation. Nonetheless, the mechanism underlying rapid approximate numerical averaging remains unknown, and several competing mechanism may account for it. Here, we tested the hypothesis that approximate numerical averaging relies on perceptual-like processes, instantiated by population coding. Participants were presented with rapid sequences of numerical values (four items per second) and were asked to convey the sequence average. We manipulated the sequences' length, variance, and mean magnitude and found that similar to perceptual averaging, the precision of the estimations improves with the length and deteriorates with (higher) variance or (higher) magnitude. To account for the results, we developed a biologically plausible population-coding model and showed that it is mathematically equivalent to a population vector. Using both quantitative and qualitative model comparison methods, we compared the population-coding model to several competing models, such as a step-by-step running average (based on leaky integration) and a midrange model. We found that the data support the population-coding model. We conclude that humans' ability to rapidly form estimations of numerical averages has many properties of the perceptual (intuitive) system rather than the arithmetic, linguistic-based (analytic) system and that population coding is likely to be its underlying mechanism.

[1]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  A. Treisman,et al.  Representation of statistical properties , 2003, Vision Research.

[3]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Tilmann Betsch,et al.  Different principles of information integration in implicit and explicit attitude formation , 2006 .

[5]  Marius Usher,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Parietal Cortex Improves Approximate Numerical Averaging , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Marius Usher,et al.  The Impact of the Mode of Thought in Complex Decisions: Intuitive Decisions are Better , 2011, Front. Psychol..

[7]  H. Damasio,et al.  The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Rapid parallel semantic processing of numbers without awareness , 2011, Cognition.

[9]  R. Shepard,et al.  The internal representation of numbers , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Nick Chater,et al.  Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Marius Usher,et al.  Non-monotonic Temporal-Weighting Indicates a Dynamically Modulated Evidence-Integration Mechanism , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  J. Maunsell,et al.  The Effect of Perceptual Learning on Neuronal Responses in Monkey Visual Area V4 , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Ariely.  Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.

[14]  R. Hertwig,et al.  The description–experience gap in risky choice , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[16]  Marius Usher,et al.  The Timescale of Perceptual Evidence Integration Can Be Adapted to the Environment , 2013, Current Biology.

[17]  H. Plessner,et al.  PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN Betsch et al. / IMPLICIT ATTITUDE FORMATION I Like It but I Don’t Know Why: A Value-Account Approach to Implicit Attitude Formation , 2022 .

[18]  D. Simons,et al.  Better than average: Alternatives to statistical summary representations for rapid judgments of average size , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Naama Friedmann,et al.  Breaking down number syntax: Spared comprehension of multi-digit numbers in a patient with impaired digit-to-word conversion , 2014, Cortex.

[20]  R. Zemel,et al.  Inference and computation with population codes. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  L. Beach,et al.  Intuitive estimation of means , 1966 .

[22]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[23]  David J. Samson,et al.  Intuitive averaging of categorized numerical stimuli , 1983 .

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[25]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Robust averaging during perceptual judgment , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Comparison of Decision Learning Models Using the Generalization Criterion Method , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Marius Usher,et al.  Intuitive Number Evaluation Is not Affected by Information Processing Load , 2017 .

[29]  S. Dehaene.  Subtracting Pigeons: Logarithmic or Linear? , 2001, Psychological science.

[30]  Nathaniel J. S. Ashby,et al.  Forgetting the past: individual differences in recency in subjective valuations from experience. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  Modeling valuations from experience: A comment on Ashby and Rakow (2014). , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[33]  Joshua A Solomon,et al.  Efficiencies for the statistics of size discrimination. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[34]  Frank Van Overwalle,et al.  A Recurrent Connectionist Model of Person Impression Formation , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[35]  Christopher Summerfield,et al.  Building Bridges between Perceptual and Economic Decision-Making: Neural and Computational Mechanisms , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[36]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Numerical Subtraction in the Pigeon: Evidence for a Linear Subjective Number Scale , 2001, Psychological science.

[37]  Y. B. Wah,et al.  Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk , Kolmogorov-Smirnov , Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests , 2011 .

[38]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties. , 1988 .

[39]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Model Comparisons and Model Selections Based on Generalization Criterion Methodology. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[40]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Bounded Integration in Parietal Cortex Underlies Decisions Even When Viewing Duration Is Dictated by the Environment , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Marius Usher,et al.  Adaptive Spontaneous Transitions between Two Mechanisms of Numerical Averaging , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[42]  Eldad Yechiam,et al.  Comparison of basic assumptions embedded in learning models for experience-based decision making , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[44]  A. Oliva,et al.  The Representation of Simple Ensemble Visual Features Outside the Focus of Attention , 2008, Psychological science.

[45]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .