Statistical and Cooperative Learning in Reading: An Artificial Orthography Learning Study

ABSTRACT This article reports two experiments in which the artificial orthography paradigm was used to investigate the mechanisms underlying learning to read. In each experiment, participants were taught the meanings and pronunications of words written in an unfamiliar orthography, and the statistical structure of the mapping between written and spoken forms (O-P) was manipulated independently of the mapping between written forms and their meanings (O-S). Our results support three main conclusions. First, the statistical structure of O-P and O-S mappings determined how easily each of those mappings was learned, suggesting that the learning of both mappings engages a common statistical learning mechanism. Second, learning to read is a cooperative process, in that learning in any particular component of the reading system is influenced by knowledge stored in the rest of the system. Finally, knowledge of sublexical regularities can be acquired as the result of exposure to words embodying those regularities.

[1]  R Todd Constable,et al.  The neurobiology of adaptive learning in reading: A contrast of different training conditions , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[2]  D. Jared Spelling-Sound Consistency and Regularity Effects in Word Naming , 2002 .

[3]  D. Plaut,et al.  Does the PMSP connectionist model of single word reading learn to read in the same way as a child , 2006 .

[4]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. , 1999, Psychological review.

[6]  Julie A. Fiez,et al.  Reading faces: Investigating the use of a novel face-based orthography in acquired alexia , 2014, Brain and Language.

[7]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic effects in single-word naming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Modeling the Successes and Failures of Interventions for Disabled Readers , 2003 .

[9]  S. Hélène Deacon,et al.  Testing the statistical learning of spelling patterns by manipulating semantic and orthographic frequency , 2012, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[10]  Jianfeng Yang,et al.  Orthographic influences on division of labor in learning to read Chinese and English: Insights from computational modeling* , 2012, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[11]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[13]  Noam Siegelman,et al.  What Predicts Successful Literacy Acquisition in a Second Language? , 2013, Psychological science.

[14]  Fiona J. Duff,et al.  Evidence for semantic involvement in regular and exception word reading in emergent readers of English. , 2016, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[15]  Wouter Duyck,et al.  The involvement of long-term serial-order memory in reading development: A longitudinal study. , 2016, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[16]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. , 2011 .

[17]  U. Goswami,et al.  Children's orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish , 1998, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[18]  M. Ullman,et al.  Specific Language Impairment is not Specific to Language: the Procedural Deficit Hypothesis , 2005, Cortex.

[19]  Jie-Li Tsai,et al.  Neuronal correlates of consistency and frequency effects on Chinese character naming: an event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  Lee Brooks,et al.  A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge of an Alphabet , 1979 .

[21]  A Karni,et al.  Alphabetical knowledge from whole words training: effects of explicit instruction and implicit experience on learning script segmentation. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The acquisition of morphological knowledge investigated through artificial language learning , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  Christian J. Fiebach,et al.  The Association between Gray Matter Volume and Reading Proficiency: A Longitudinal Study of Beginning Readers , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Morphological aspects of language processing. , 1997 .

[25]  Barry Fishman,et al.  A Longitudinal Cluster-Randomized Controlled Study on the Accumulating Effects of Individualized Literacy Instruction on Students’ Reading From First Through Third Grade , 2013, Psychological science.

[26]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension , 2007 .

[27]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. , 1994 .

[28]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[29]  Gui Xue,et al.  Cerebral Asymmetry in the Fusiform Areas Predicted the Efficiency of Learning a New Writing System , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  B Byrne,et al.  On teaching articulatory phonetics via an orthography , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Properties of school Chinese: implications for learning to read. , 2003, Child development.

[32]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  The influence of consistency, frequency, and semantics on learning to read: an artificial orthography paradigm. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Hua Shu,et al.  On the relationship between phonological awareness, morphological awareness and Chinese literacy skills: evidence from an 8-year longitudinal study. , 2016, Developmental science.

[34]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Phonetic awareness: Knowledge of orthography–phonology relationships in the character acquisition of Chinese children. , 2000 .

[35]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading , 1984 .

[36]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[37]  L. Squire Declarative and Nondeclarative Memory: Multiple Brain Systems Supporting Learning and Memory , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[39]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Comparing and Validating Methods of Reading Instruction Using Behavioural and Neural Findings in an Artificial Orthography , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  Antoni Rodríguez Fornells,et al.  Brain signatures of early lexical and morphological learning of a new language , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Jeremiah J Trudeau Semantic contributions to word naming with artificial lexicons , 2006 .

[42]  J. Rueckl,et al.  The Influence of Morphological Regularities on the Dynamics of a Connectionist Network , 1999, Brain and Language.

[43]  Ram Frost,et al.  Towards a universal model of reading , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[44]  P. H. Seymour,et al.  Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[45]  Hua Chen Wang,et al.  Predictors of Orthographic Learning of Regular and Irregular Words , 2013 .

[46]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Spelling as Statistical Learning: Using Consonantal Context to Spell Vowels , 2006 .

[47]  R. Todd Constable,et al.  Effects of Stimulus Difficulty and Repetition on Printed Word Identification: An fMRI Comparison of Nonimpaired and Reading-disabled Adolescent Cohorts , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Yuliya N. Yoncheva,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for visual words is shaped by attention to sublexical units during initial learning , 2015, Brain and Language.

[49]  D. Share Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition , 1995, Cognition.

[50]  A Karni,et al.  Procedural and declarative knowledge of word recognition and letter decoding in reading an artificial script. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[51]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Modelling the implicit learning of phonological decoding from training on whole-word spellings and pronunciations , 2016 .

[52]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[53]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? , 2000 .

[54]  Lee H. Wurm,et al.  Semantic effects in naming perceptual identification but not in delayed naming: implications for models and tasks. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  Joanne Arciuli,et al.  Statistical Learning Is Related to Reading Ability in Children and Adults , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[56]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[57]  B. Wandell,et al.  Development of white matter and reading skills , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  R. Glushko The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[59]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Morphological learning in a novel language: A cross-language comparison , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[60]  James R. Booth,et al.  The Involvement of Occipital and Inferior Frontal Cortex in the Phonological Learning of Chinese Characters , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  Hua Shu,et al.  Simulating Language-specific and Language-general Effects in a Statistical Learning Model of Chinese Reading. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[62]  J. Booth,et al.  Item-specific and generalization effects on brain activation when learning Chinese characters , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[64]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Representation and processing of derived words , 1987 .

[65]  D. Share Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[66]  C. Ho,et al.  A “Radical” Approach to Reading Development in Chinese: The Role of Semantic Radicals and Phonetic Radicals , 2003 .