Matching and Sorting in Online Dating

Using data on user attributes and interactions from an online dating site, we estimate mate preferences, and use the Gale-Shapley algorithm to predict sta ble matches. The predicted matches are similar to the actual matches achieved by the dating site, and the actual matches are approximately efficient. Outof-sample predictions of offline matches, i.e., marriages, exhibit assortative mating patterns similar to those observed in actual marriages. Thus, mate pref erences, without resort to search frictions, can generate sorting in marriages. However, we underpredict some of the correlation patterns; search frictions may play a role in explaining the discrepancy. (

[1]  P. Chiappori,et al.  Economics of the Family , 2014, Nature.

[2]  J. Spuhler.  Assortative mating with respect to physical characteristics. , 1968, Eugenics quarterly.

[3]  G. Becker.  Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .

[4]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data , 1979 .

[5]  A. Roth.  The Evolution of the Labor Market for Medical Interns and Residents: A Case Study in Game Theory , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  Facial Resemblance in Engaged and Married Couples , 1989 .

[7]  Dawn Owens,et al.  Education and Attractiveness in Marriage Choices , 1990 .

[8]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis , 1990 .

[9]  J. Gagnon,et al.  The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States , 1994 .

[10]  D. Buss.  The Evolution Of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating , 1994 .

[11]  Warren M. Hern.  The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating , 1995 .

[12]  V. Sadock.  The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States , 1995 .

[13]  H. Haverkos,et al.  The social organization of sexuality. , 1995, JAMA.

[14]  D. Hamermesh,et al.  Beauty, Productivity and Discrimination: Lawyers&Apos; Looks and Lucre , 1995 .

[15]  Melvyn G. Coles,et al.  Marriage and Class , 1997 .

[16]  M. Kalmijn,et al.  Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. , 1998, Annual review of sociology.

[17]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  S. Anthony Wolfe,et al.  Survival of the Prettiest: The Science of Beauty. , 2001 .

[19]  Hiroyuki Adachi,et al.  A search model of two-sided matching under nontransferable utility , 2003, Journal of Economics Theory.

[20]  A. Roth,et al.  Unraveling Reduces Mobility in a Labor Market: Gastroenterology with and without a Centralized Match , 2003, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Linda Y. Wong,et al.  Structural Estimation of Marriage Models , 2002, Journal of Labor Economics.

[22]  Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al.  School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach , 2003 .

[23]  D. Lichter,et al.  Homogamy Among Dating, Cohabiting, and Married Couples , 2004 .

[24]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Unraveling Yields Inefficient Matchings: Evidence from Post-Season College Football Bowls , 2004 .

[25]  Daniela Del Boca,et al.  Household Time Allocation and Modes of Behavior: A Theory of Sorts , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  R. Kurzban,et al.  HurryDate: Mate preferences in action , 2005 .

[27]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Pairwise Kidney Exchange , 2004, J. Econ. Theory.

[28]  M. Belot,et al.  Can Anyone Be 'the' One? Evidence on Mate Selection from Speed Dating , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[29]  A. Siow,et al.  Who Marries Whom and Why , 2006, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence From a Speed Dating Experiment , 2006 .

[31]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Sex Differences in Mate Preferences Revisited : Do People Know What They Initially Desire in a Romantic Partner ? , 2008 .

[32]  Soohyung Lee.  Preferences and Choice Constraints in Marital Sorting: Evidence From Korea , 2008 .

[33]  Emir Kamenica,et al.  Racial Preferences in Dating , 2008 .

[34]  A. Barr,et al.  Bridging the Gender Divide: An Experimental Analysis of Group Formation in African Villages , 2009 .

[35]  Soohyung Lee.  Marriage and Online Mate-Search Services: Evidence From South Korea , 2009 .

[36]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Marry for What? Caste and Mate Selection in Modern India , 2009 .

[37]  Dan Ariely,et al.  What makes you click?—Mate preferences in online dating , 2010 .

[38]  Leeat Yariv,et al.  Child-Adoption Matching: Preferences for Gender and Race , 2010 .

[39]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Research Commentary - The Design, Use, and Consequences of Virtual Processes , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  H.-P. Blossfeld,et al.  Partnerwahl als konsensuelle Entscheidung , 2010 .

[41]  Gonçalo Pacheco-de-Almeida,et al.  Erosion, Time Compression, and Self-Displacement of Leaders in Hypercompetitive Environments , 2010 .

[42]  Peter S. Arcidiacono,et al.  Terms of Endearment: An Equilibrium Model of Sex and Matching , 2010 .

[43]  J. Sákovics,et al.  Exclusive Nightclubs and Lonely Hearts Columns: Non-Monotone Participation in Optional Intermediation , 2010 .

[44]  D. Hamermesh,et al.  "Beauty is the Promise of Happiness"? , 2011 .

[45]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  The Good News-Bad News Effect: Asymmetric Processing of Objective Information about Yourself , 2011 .

[46]  K. Kościński.  How do pairs matched in physical attractiveness form if people are unaware of their own attractiveness? , 2011 .

[47]  Todd D. Kendall.  The Relationship Between Internet Access and Divorce Rate , 2011 .

[48]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Online Dating , 2012, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.