Optimization of bonnet thickness with respect to pedestrian safety

Abstract Head and face injuries in car–pedestrian accidents account for 60 per cent of all pedestrian fatal injuries, whereas 17.3 per cent of head injuries were due to the bonnet. The above values demonstrate the necessity to consider more carefully the role of the bonnet in pedestrian head safety. Redesigning the bonnet structure to improve pedestrian protection has recently received considerable attention by automobile manufacturers and industry institutes. However, there is a lack of research that considers methods of choosing the most effective thicknesses of bonnet skin and bonnet reinforcement with respect to pedestrian safety. This study analyses the effects of the bonnet skin and bonnet reinforcement thicknesses on pedestrian head injury by performing simulations of headform-impactor-to-bonnet tests according to the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee Working Group 17 regulations for different thicknesses. An optimization method of selecting the most effective thicknesses of bonnet skin and bonnet reinforcement will be introduced. Many positions on the bonnet surface are considered to enhance pedestrian friendliness by using this method. Moreover, a bonnet with the optimal thicknesses is not only pedestrian friendly but also as stiff as possible. Based on the proposed method, this study presents steps for optimizing the bonnet skin and bonnet reinforcement thicknesses using a particular automobile model.

[1]  K.Ch. Fuerstenberg,et al.  Pedestrian protection using laserscanners , 2005 .

[2]  F. Furini,et al.  STATIC-VIBRATIONAL DESIGN OF A BONNET WITH FRAME TOPOLOGICAL OPTIMIZATION , 1998 .

[3]  Ingo Kalliske,et al.  IMPROVEMENTS TO PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION AS EXEMPLIFIED ON A STANDARD-SIZED CAR , 2001 .

[4]  Susumu Kuroda,et al.  EVALUATION OF PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION STRUCTURES USING IMPACTORS AND FULL-SCALE DUMMY TESTS , 2003 .

[5]  Alessandro Zanella,et al.  Smart Bumper for pedestrian impact recognition , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[6]  F. A. Berg,et al.  Pedestrian Protection in Europe The Potential of Car Design and Impact Testing , 2002 .

[7]  Tetsuo Maki,et al.  Development of pedestrian protection technologies for ASV , 2002 .

[8]  Young Woo Lee,et al.  Development of a vehicle structure with enhanced pedestrian safety , 2003 .

[9]  W. von Seelen,et al.  Walking pedestrian recognition , 1999, Proceedings 199 IEEE/IEEJ/JSAI International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (Cat. No.99TH8383).

[10]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  EVALUATION OF A NEW PEDESTRIAN HEAD INJURY PROTECTION SYSTEM WITH A SENSOR IN THE BUMPER AND LIFTING OF THE BONNET’S REAR PART , 2001 .

[11]  Tso-Liang Teng,et al.  Development and validation of FE models of impactor for pedestrian testing , 2008 .

[12]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Pedestrian tracking from a moving vehicle , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2000 (Cat. No.00TH8511).