Accelerating reactor development with accessible simulation and automated optimization tools

Abstract Methane CPOX is a common route to syngas, while monolith reactors are a common type of process intensified reactor. Given the general need in process intensified systems to extract improved performance, a proof-of-concept optimization study was conducted to maximize hydrogen productivity and minimize peak reactor temperature for methane CPOX on a coated metallic monolith reactor. In this study, DAKOTA (optimization toolkit), DETCHEM™ (surface reaction and thermodynamics toolkit), and OpenFOAM (multiphysics simulation software) are newly integrated to optimize non-linear reactive configurations. Using an automated derivative-free multi-objective optimization method, the hydrogen productivity per volume (kg H2/m3/s) can be substantially increased while concurrently reducing the peak reaction temperature. Specifically, by allowing the coupled simulation framework to change the distribution and amount of catalyst, along with channel diameter, feed flow rate and inlet temperature, hydrogen productivity can be increased up to 1.8 times over previous literature values with a reduction in peak metal temperature of about 40 °C, or increased by about 1.6 times with a reduction in peak reactor metal temperature of about 120 °C, from a previously reported 818 °C down to below 700 °C. The presented results demonstrate the potential for design optimization in reactive systems in general, and in particular for process intensified components.

[1]  Hrvoje Jasak,et al.  A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques , 1998 .

[2]  A numerical optimization study on the catalytic dry reforming of methane in a spatially resolved fixed-bed reactor , 2016 .

[3]  Matthias Hettel,et al.  3D modeling of a CPOX-reformer including detailed chemistry and radiation effects with DUO , 2018, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[4]  Joel Guerrero,et al.  Surrogate-Based Optimization Using an Open-Source Framework: The Bulbous Bow Shape Optimization Case , 2018, Mathematical and Computational Applications.

[5]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[6]  Partha Kundu,et al.  Formulation development, modeling and optimization of emulsification process using evolving RSM coupled hybrid ANN-GA framework , 2015 .

[7]  M. Kraume,et al.  Parameter optimization for the oxidative coupling of methane in a fixed bed reactor by combination of response surface methodology and computational fluid dynamics , 2014 .

[8]  Olaf Deutschmann,et al.  Modeling the partial oxidation of methane in a short‐contact‐time reactor , 1998 .

[9]  Anthony Brabazon,et al.  Evolving parametric aircraft models for design exploration and optimisation , 2014, Neurocomputing.

[10]  G. Groppi,et al.  Optimal design of a CH4 CPO-reformer with honeycomb catalyst: Combined effect of catalyst load and channel size on the surface temperature profile , 2011 .

[11]  Alexander Ohm,et al.  Automated CFD Optimisation of a Small Hydro Turbine for Water Distribution Networks , 2017 .

[12]  L. Schmidt,et al.  Catalytic partial oxidation of methane on rhodium and platinum: Spatial profiles at elevated pressure , 2008 .

[13]  Olaf Deutschmann,et al.  Modeling and simulation of heterogeneous catalytic reactions : from the molecular process to the technical system , 2011 .

[14]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  DAKOTA : a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis. Version 5.0, user's reference manual. , 2010 .

[15]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  An aerodynamic design optimization framework using a discrete adjoint approach with OpenFOAM , 2018 .

[16]  Nobuyuki Umetani,et al.  Learning three-dimensional flow for interactive aerodynamic design , 2018, ACM Trans. Graph..

[17]  Olaf Deutschmann,et al.  Natural Gas Conversion in Monolithic Catalysts: Interaction of Chemical Reactions and Transport Phenomena , 2001 .

[18]  Jörg Frauhammer,et al.  Modelling steady state and ignition during catalytic methane oxidation in a monolith reactor , 2000 .

[19]  Henning Bonart,et al.  Numerical simulation of a structured catalytic methane reformer by DUO: The new computational interface for OpenFOAM® and DETCHEM™ , 2015 .