Calibration of Comprehension: Research and Implications for Education and Instruction.

The ability to accurately evaluate one's understanding of text information is critical for optimum learning to take place. One widely used paradigm for examining the accuracy of individuals' self-assessed comprehension has been termed calibration of comprehension. In this paradigm, students read a passage and are asked to make predictions about their future performance on a comprehension test. Calibration of comprehension is the relation between students' confidence and performance or between predicted and actual performance. In the present paper we review research on calibration of comprehension, examining a number of variables that have been found to influence calibration ability. In the first three sections of our paper we focus on the effects of individual, task, and text variables on students' calibration of comprehension. In the final section, we discuss implications of research on calibration for education and instruction. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

[1]  L. Castenell.  Achievement Motivation: An Investigation of Adolescents’ Achievement Patterns , 1983 .

[2]  Karen M. Zabrucky,et al.  METACOMPREHENSION AND COMPREHENSION PERFORMANCE IN YOUNGER AND OLDER ADULTS , 1997 .

[3]  R. Maki,et al.  Metamemory for narrative text , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[4]  M. Hannafin,et al.  Metacognition research and theory: Analysis and implications for instructional design , 1992 .

[5]  John A. Glover,et al.  Improving readers’ estimates of learning from text: The role of inserted questions , 1989 .

[6]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions , 1984 .

[7]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Memory performance awareness in younger and older adults. , 1990, Psychology and aging.

[8]  R H Maki,et al.  The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  The Impact of Comprehension Instruction on the Calibration of Comprehension. , 1993 .

[10]  Karen M. Zabrucky,et al.  The Relations among Interest, Self-Assessed Comprehension, and Comprehension Performance in Young Adults. , 1996 .

[11]  H. Swanson.  Influence of Metacognitive Knowledge and Aptitude on Problem Solving. , 1990 .

[12]  R H Maki,et al.  Metacomprehension of text material. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Michael Pressley,et al.  More about the development of self-regulation: Complex, long-term, and thoroughly social , 1995 .

[14]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Test difficulty and judgment bias , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[15]  M. Boekaerts.  Self-regulated Learning at the Junction of Cognition and Motivation , 1996 .

[16]  Gregory Schraw.  The Effect of Generalized Metacognitive Knowledge on Test Performance and Confidence Judgments , 1996 .

[17]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Encoding difficulty and memory: toward a unifying theory , 1986 .

[18]  Comprehension-Monitoring Failure in Skilled Adult Readers. , 1986 .

[19]  P. Alexander,et al.  Metacognition: Answered and Unanswered Questions , 1989 .

[20]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[21]  B. Zimmerman.  Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective , 1995 .

[22]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Constraining factors in calibration of comprehension , 1990 .

[23]  Suzanne E. Wade,et al.  Effects of Importance and Interest on Recall of Biographical Text , 1990 .

[24]  Maria T. Potenza,et al.  Constraints on the Calibration of Performance , 1993 .

[25]  Jeffrey J. Walczyk,et al.  Effects of examples and embedded questions on the accuracy of comprehension self-assessments , 1989 .

[26]  S. Karabenick.  Social influences on metacognition : Effects of colearner questioning on comprehension monitoring , 1996 .

[27]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[28]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  The Effect of Metacognitive Knowledge on Local and Global Monitoring , 1994 .

[29]  A. Glenberg,et al.  The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension , 1982 .

[30]  K. Zabrucky,et al.  Contributions of working memory and evaluation and regulation of understanding to adults' recall of texts. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[31]  Thérèse Bouffard-Bouchard.  Effect of Activating Conditional Knowledge on Self-efficacy and Comprehension Monitoring , 1994 .

[32]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Use of Cognitive Capacity in Reading: Effects of Some Content Features of Text. , 1983 .

[33]  D. Forrest-Pressley,et al.  Metacognition, cognition, and human performance , 1985 .

[34]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Discourse comprehension : essays in honor of Walter Kintsch , 1996 .

[35]  Ruth H. Maki,et al.  Increased processing enhances calibration of comprehension , 1990 .

[36]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Interest and Learning From Text , 1991 .

[37]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Inexpert calibration of comprehension , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[38]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[39]  Carole A. Ames,et al.  Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students' Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes , 1988 .

[40]  J. Baron.  Thinking and Deciding , 2023 .

[41]  J. Shaughnessy,et al.  Confidence-Judgment Accuracy as a Predictor of Test Performance. , 1979 .

[42]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[43]  M. Serra,et al.  Role of Practice Tests in the Accuracy of Test Predictions on Text Material. , 1992 .

[44]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Perceived Readiness for Examination Performance (PREP) Produced by Initial Reading of Text and Text Containing Adjunct Questions. , 1987 .

[45]  Douglas J. Stanwyck,et al.  Illusion of Knowing in Adult Readers: Effects of Reading Skill and Passage Length , 1997 .

[46]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The role of elaborative and schema processes in story memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Comparison of Monitoring during Study and during Testing on a Sentence-Learning Task. , 1988 .

[48]  M. Boekaerts.  Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories , 1995 .

[49]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Enhancing Calibration of Comprehension , 1987 .

[50]  M. Just,et al.  Cognitive processes in comprehension , 1977 .

[51]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  Interest, Learning, and Motivation , 1991 .

[52]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning: Monitoring Learning From Text , 1990 .

[53]  Karen M. Zabrucky,et al.  Rereading to Understand: The Role of Text Coherence and Reader Proficiency. , 1993 .

[54]  E. Ghatala,et al.  Delusions about performance on multiple-choice comprehension tests. , 1988 .

[55]  Mark D. Kroll,et al.  The illusion of knowing, error detection, and motivational orientations , 1992 .

[56]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[57]  Ruth H. Maki,et al.  The basis of test predictions for text material. , 1992 .

[58]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Does a General Monitoring Skill Exist , 1995 .

[59]  Arthur M. Glenberg,et al.  Calibration of comprehension. , 1985 .

[60]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[61]  Suzanne Hidi,et al.  Interest and Its Contribution as a Mental Resource for Learning , 1990 .

[62]  D. Schunk.  Inherent Details of Self-Regulated Learning Include Student Perceptions , 1995 .

[63]  L. Baker.  Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader , 1989 .

[64]  Ruth Garner,et al.  When Children and Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Toward a Theory of Settings , 1990 .