"The Only Proper Scale of Representation": The Politics of Statistics and Stories

This essay explores the political resonances of quantitative methods in a reading of American discourse surrounding their social functions and virtues. Key texts are drawn from three periods: the founding period, the late nineteenth century, and social psychology in the mid-twentieth century. It is shown that the idea of quantification is closely associated with democratic ideals. In adopting these methods, scholars cloak themselves in the image of objective, deliberative, public-minded democratic participants. Critics of quantification indict its dehumanizing indifference to personal experience and its susceptibility to manipulation. It is concluded that quantification sits uneasily alongside history and story-telling as two poles of modern social description.

[1]  W. D. Foland Reflections on the revolution in France , 1987 .

[2]  J. Mill A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive : being a connected view of the principles of evidence, and the methods of scientific investigation. , 2011 .

[3]  Piet Schenelaars,et al.  Public opinion , 2013, BDJ.

[4]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1954 .

[5]  L. Davis Factual Fictions: The Origins of the English Novel , 1983 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[7]  Friedrich A. Kittler Draculas Vermächtnis : technische Schriften , 1993 .

[8]  John Higham,et al.  : That Noble Dream: The "Objectivity Question" and the American Historical Profession , 1990 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[10]  R. Lenth Statistics on the Table: The History of Statistical Concepts and Methods , 2002 .

[11]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[12]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Belief in the law of small numbers , 1982 .

[14]  Alexander Zahar,et al.  Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science , 1991, Medical History.

[15]  K. Pearson The Grammar of Science , 1900 .

[16]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  The Marx-Engels Reader , 1972 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases , 1982 .

[18]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics. , 1993 .

[19]  E. Marey,et al.  La méthode graphique dans les sciences expérimentales et principalement en physiologie et en médecine , 1970 .

[20]  K. Pearson The Grammar of Science , 1892, Nature.

[21]  L. Festinger,et al.  When Prophecy Fails , 1956 .

[22]  Stefano Giglio,et al.  Hard times. , 1994, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[23]  P. Guttorp,et al.  The Taming of Chance. , 1992 .

[24]  Steuart Henderson Britt,et al.  Review of The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. , 1945 .

[25]  Chance, Love, and Logic: Philosophical Essays , 1924, Nature.

[26]  C. Humphrey,et al.  The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life , 2000 .

[27]  J. Locke An Essay concerning Human Understanding , 1924, Nature.

[28]  B. Wright,et al.  Democracy In America , 2011 .