Ensuring student success: the role of support services in improving the quality of the student learning experience

This paper is based on the premise that universities have an obligation to provide adequate student support services, such as learning assistance (that is, assistance with academic writing and other study skills) and that in order to be effective such services must be responsive to the wider policy and social implications of student attrition and retention. The paper outlines briefly some of the factors that have influenced the development of learning assistance practices in Australia and America. This is followed by an account of experiences at one Australian metropolitan university where learning assistance service provision shifted from a decentralised, facultybased model to a centralised model of service delivery. This shift was in response to concerns about lack of quality and consistency in a support model dependent upon faculty resources yet a follow up study identified other problems in the centralised delivery of learning assistance services. These problems, clustered under the heading contextualised versus decontextualised learning assistance, include the relevance of generic learning assistance services to students struggling with specific course related demands; the apparent tensions between challenging students and assisting students at risk of failure; and variations in the level of collaboration between learning advisers and academic staff in supporting students in the learning environment. These problems are analysed using the theoretical modelling derived from the tools made available through cultural historical activity theory and expansive visibilisation (Engestrom & Miettinen, 1999).

[1]  K. Hall,et al.  Quality and Accountability in Higher Education: Improving Policy, Enhancing Performance , 2003 .

[2]  Leonie Elphinstone,et al.  Utilising an Organisational Learning Approach to Facilitate Change in a University and Improve the Retention of First-year Students , 2003 .

[3]  Stella Cottrell,et al.  Teaching Study Skills and Supporting Learning , 2001 .

[4]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[5]  Y. Engeström.  Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[6]  Bert van Oers,et al.  From context to contextualizing , 1998 .

[7]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[8]  D. Hounsell.  The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education , 1997 .

[9]  Deborah Peach,et al.  Improving the Provision of Learning Assistance Services in Higher Education , 2004 .

[10]  William Taylor,et al.  Universities under Scrutiny. , 1987 .

[11]  P. Candy.  Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education , 1994 .

[12]  M. Devlin,et al.  Models of Learning Support in Victorian Universities: Issues and Implications , 1995 .

[13]  Dai Hounsell.  Understanding Teaching and Teaching for Understanding , 1997 .

[14]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Classrooms as Communities: Exploring the Educational Character of Student Persistence. , 1997 .

[15]  Allison Astorino-Courtois,et al.  Degrees of Difficulty , 2000 .

[16]  Harry Daniels,et al.  Cultural historical activity theory and professional learning , 2004 .

[17]  Ormond Simpson.  The costs and benefits of student retention for students, institutions and governments , 2005 .