Computational Artifacts of the In Situ Electric Field in Anatomical Models Exposed to Low-Frequency Magnetic Field

An in situ (internal) electric field is used as a dosimetric quantity for human protection from low-frequency electromagnetic fields (lower than 5 MHz) under international safety standard/;guidelines. The IEEE standard uses a homogenous elliptical cross section to derive external field strength corresponding to an in situ field strength, while the International Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) guidelines use anatomical models to relate them. In the latter, “the 99th percentile value of the in situ electric field averaged over the cube of its side length of 2 mm” is used to represent the maximum in situ electric field. This metric was introduced to suppress computational artifacts that are inherent when using voxelized anatomical models, in which curved boundaries are discretized with a stair-casing approximation. To suppress the error, a few schemes have been proposed for treating the computational artifacts. In this study, the various schemes to suppress the artifacts are reviewed. Subsequently, a postprocessing method for determining the appropriate maximum in situ field strength is proposed. The performance of the proposed scheme is first verified by comparison with an analytical solution in a multilayered sphere. The method is then applied for different exposure scenarios in anatomically realistic human models where the volume under computation is also considered.

[1]  M. A. Stuchly,et al.  High-resolution organ dosimetry for human exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields , 1998 .

[2]  A. Ahlbom Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[3]  Damijan Miklavčič,et al.  Pre- and post-natal exposure of children to EMF generated by domestic induction cookers , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Shi Feng,et al.  Multi-GPU Accelerated Admittance Method for High-Resolution Human Exposure Evaluation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  N. Kuster,et al.  Analysis of human brain exposure to low‐frequency magnetic fields: A numerical assessment of spatially averaged electric fields and exposure limits , 2013, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  T. Nagaoka,et al.  Development of realistic high-resolution whole-body voxel models of Japanese adult males and females of average height and weight, and application of models to radio-frequency electromagnetic-field dosimetry. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Fabio Freschi,et al.  Arc Welding Processes: An Electrical Safety Analysis , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[8]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Low-frequency electrical dosimetry: research agenda of the IEEE International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Hiroo Tarao,et al.  Simple estimation of induced electric fields in nervous system tissues for human exposure to non-uniform electric fields at power frequency. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  Development of pregnant female, hybrid voxel-mathematical models and their application to the dosimetry of applied magnetic and electric fields at 50 Hz , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  P. Dimbylow Development of the female voxel phantom, NAOMI, and its application to calculations of induced current densities and electric fields from applied low frequency magnetic and electric fields , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Kanako Wake,et al.  Intercomparison of induced fields in Japanese male model for ELF magnetic field exposures: effect of different computational methods and codes. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[13]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Dosimetry in models of child and adult for low-frequency electric field , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Effect of the averaging volume and algorithm on the in situ electric field for uniform electric- and magnetic-field exposures. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Sai-Wing Leung,et al.  Prediction of magnetic field emissions by current source reconstruction using radial basis function network , 2015 .

[16]  Valerio De Santis,et al.  On the issues related to compliance assessment of ICNIRP 2010 basic restrictions. , 2014, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[17]  Niels Kuster,et al.  The Virtual Family—development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Evaluation of the induced electric field and compliance procedure for a wireless power transfer system in an electrical vehicle. , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  A. Hirata,et al.  Reducing the staircasing error in computational dosimetry of low-frequency electromagnetic fields , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.