Neuroimaging biomarkers of cognitive decline in healthy older adults via unified learning

Cognitive aging in healthy adults exhibits significant and heterogeneous variability. In this study, we apply a robust unified learning framework to cluster subgroups using neuroimaging data (brain volume and white matter), to identify neurological phenotypes that can sort out the heterogeneity in cognitive aging and help identify potential risk factors for suboptimal brain aging. Using machine learning analytics, results revealed two unique subgroups in healthy older adults with different patterns of white matter integrity and brain volumetric measures. The classification of phenotypical subgroups in healthy older adults may inform the understanding of the complexity of brain changes before the onset of clinical symptoms. The identified neuroimaging features that defined group classification are recognized as important structures that subserve cognitive performance. Further analysis of these potential biomarkers that help predict trajectory of cognitive decline in symptom free individuals could lead to the detection of early stages of neurodegenerative diseases.

[1]  Rui Xu,et al.  Clustering Algorithms in Biomedical Research: A Review , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  M W Weiner,et al.  Hippocampal and cortical atrophy predict dementia in subcortical ischemic vascular disease , 2000, Neurology.

[3]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[4]  Blaz Zupan,et al.  Predictive data mining in clinical medicine: Current issues and guidelines , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  G. Arbanas.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) , 2015 .

[6]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Feature selection in unsupervised learning via evolutionary search , 2000, KDD '00.

[7]  David H. Laidlaw,et al.  Kernel regression estimation of fiber orientation mixtures in diffusion MRI , 2016, NeuroImage.

[8]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[9]  W. M. van der Flier,et al.  Heterogeneity of White Matter Hyperintensities in Alzheimer's Disease: Post-Mortem Quantitative MRI and Neuropathology , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  Lars Nyberg,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience of aging : linking cognitive and cerebral aging , 2004 .

[11]  Michalis Vazirgiannis,et al.  On Clustering Validation Techniques , 2001, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[12]  R. Ylikoski,et al.  The Relationship of Neuropsychological Functioning with Demographic Characteristics, Brain Imaging Findings, and Health in Elderly Individuals , 2000 .

[13]  Liuqing Peng,et al.  CVAP: Validation for Cluster Analyses , 2009, Data Sci. J..

[14]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[15]  Fabio Tozeto Ramos,et al.  On Integrated Clustering and Outlier Detection , 2014, NIPS.

[16]  E. Gordon,et al.  Cognitive aging, executive function, and fractional anisotropy: a diffusion tensor MR imaging study. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[18]  P. Rousseeuw.  Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[19]  Xi Luo,et al.  White matter changes with age utilizing quantitative diffusion MRI , 2014, Neurology.

[20]  Donald C. Wunsch,et al.  Clustering Data of Mixed Categorical and Numerical Type With Unsupervised Feature Learning , 2015, IEEE Access.

[21]  Gayla R. Olbricht,et al.  Ensemble statistical and subspace clustering model for analysis of autism spectrum disorder phenotypes , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[22]  N. Schuff,et al.  MRI predictors of cognition in subcortical ischemic vascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease , 2001, Neurology.

[23]  Shu-Ching Chen,et al.  Computational Health Informatics in the Big Data Age , 2016, ACM Comput. Surv..

[24]  Naftali Raz,et al.  Ageing and the Brain , 2019 .

[25]  E. Gordon,et al.  PRELIMINARY VALIDITY OF “INTEGNEUROTM”: A NEW COMPUTERIZED BATTERY OF NEUROCOGNITIVE TESTS , 2005, The International journal of neuroscience.

[26]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation , 2002 .

[27]  P. Hof,et al.  Cognitive Consequences of Thalamic, Basal Ganglia, and Deep White Matter Lacunes in Brain Aging and Dementia , 2005, Stroke.

[28]  Maria Paula Foss,et al.  Heterogeneity of cognitive aging in Brazilian normal elderls , 2009, Dementia & neuropsychologia.

[29]  Donald C. Wunsch,et al.  Sorting the phenotypic heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorders: A hierarchical clustering model , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB).

[30]  Karen M Rodrigue,et al.  Brain Aging and Its Modifiers , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[31]  A. Ardila,et al.  Normal aging increases cognitive heterogeneity: analysis of dispersion in WAIS-III scores across age. , 2007, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[32]  Francisco Azuaje,et al.  Cluster validation techniques for genome expression data , 2003, Signal Process..

[33]  David H. Laidlaw,et al.  Quantitative tractography metrics of white matter integrity in diffusion-tensor MRI , 2008, NeuroImage.