The Detectability of Geometric Structure in Rapidly Changing Optical Patterns

Human vision is sensitive to the coherent structure and motion of simple dot patterns undergoing rapid random transformations, even when the component dots are widely separated spatially. A study is reported in which visual sensitivity to translations, rotations, expansions, pure shear, and additive combinations of these transformations was investigated. Observers discriminated between coherent (correlated) movements, in which all the component dots moved simultaneously in corresponding directions and distances, and incoherent (uncorrelated) movements, in which the movements of individual dots were statistically independent. In experiment 1 the accuracy of coherence discrimination was found to be similar for all four of the basic transformations and to increase linearly with the distance of the movements. The discriminability of coherent versus incoherent motion was also found to be similar to the detectability of any motion, suggesting that concurrent movements of individual dots are visually interrelated. In experiments 2 and 3 the visual independence of these four groups of transformations was tested by comparing the accuracy of coherence discrimination of each of the transformations presented alone with that when added to background motions produced by each of the four transformations. Coherence discriminations were less accurate when the target transformation was added to another background transformation, indicating that these transformations are not visually independent. Rotations and expansions, however, were visually independent. In experiment 3 qualitatively similar effects for patterns of several different sizes and dot densities were found. In general, an impressive visual sensitivity to globally coherent structure and motion under several different geometric transformations was observed in these experiments. A basic theoretical issue concerns the local visual mechanisms underlying this sensitivity.

[1]  J S Lappin,et al.  Accurate visual measurement of three-dimensional moving patterns. , 1983, Science.

[2]  M. Braunstein Depth perception through motion , 1976 .

[3]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Spatial determinants of depth perception in two-dot motion patterns , 1972 .

[4]  D L Gilden,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of apparent motion. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  S. McKee A local mechanism for differential velocity detection , 1981, Vision Research.

[6]  G. Johansson PERCEPTION OF MOTION AND CHANGING FORM: A study of visual perception from continuous transformations of a solid angle of light at the eye , 1964 .

[7]  S. McKee,et al.  Visual acuity in the presence of retinal-image motion. , 1975, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Invariant Properties of the Motion Parallax Field due to the Movement of Rigid Bodies Relative to an Observer , 1975 .

[9]  R Blake,et al.  Detection and discrimination of coherent motion , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J S Lappin,et al.  Detection of three-dimensional structure in moving optical patterns. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  K. Nakayama Differential motion hyperacuity under conditions of common image motion , 1981, Vision Research.

[12]  G Westheimer,et al.  The spatial sense of the eye. Proctor lecture. , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[14]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Perception of temporal order in adjacent visual stimuli , 1977, Vision Research.

[15]  Claes von Hofsten,et al.  Visual perception of motion in depth: Application of a vector model to three-dot motion patterns , 1973 .

[16]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .