Object-Based Attention and Occlusion Evidence From Normal Participants and a Computational Model

One way of perceptually organizing a complex visual scene is to attend selectively to information in a particular physical loca tion. Another way of reducing the complexity in the input is to attend selectively to an individual object in the scene and to process its elements preferentially. This latter, object-based attention process was examined, and the predicted superiority for reporting features from 1 relative to 2 objects was replicated in a series of experiments. This object-based process was robust even under conditions of occlusion, although there were some b oundary conditions on its operation. Finally, an account of the data is provided via simulations of the findings in a computational mod el. The claim is that object-based attention arises from a mechanism that groups together those features based on internal representations developed over perceptual experience and then preferentially gates these features for later, selective processing.

[1]  J. I. Nelson,et al.  Binding in the visual system , 1998 .

[2]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Early completion of occluded objects , 1998, Vision Research.

[3]  Barry D. Vaughan,et al.  Object-Based Visual Selection: Evidence From Perceptual Completion , 1998 .

[4]  M. Farah,et al.  Is visual image segmentation a bottom-up or an interactive process? , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  A F Kramer,et al.  Object-based attentional selection--grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations?: comment on vecera and Farah (1994). , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  N Lavie,et al.  On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  C. Folk,et al.  Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-blind” attentional spotlight , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Richard S. Zemel,et al.  Lending direction to neural networks , 1995, Neural Networks.

[9]  S. Yantis Perceived Continuity of Occluded Visual Objects , 1995 .

[10]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Orientation and color processing for partially occluded objects , 1995, Vision Research.

[11]  D. Tanné,et al.  Perceptual learning: learning to see , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  C. Folk,et al.  Shifting Visual Attention in Stereographic Displays: A Time Course Analysis , 1994, Human factors.

[13]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Non-spatial extinction following lesions of the parietal lobe in humans , 1994, Nature.

[14]  Jon Driver,et al.  Covert Orienting in the Split Brain Reveals Hemispheric Specialization for Object-Based Attention , 1994 .

[15]  R. Day,et al.  On apparent misalignment of collinear edges and boundaries , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Local and Global Processes in Visual Completion , 1994 .

[17]  M. Peterson Object Recognition Processes Can and Do Operate Before Figure–Ground Organization , 1994 .

[18]  A. Karni,et al.  Dependence on REM sleep of overnight improvement of a perceptual skill. , 1994, Science.

[19]  A Koriat,et al.  Object-based apparent motion , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Representational Development of Direction in Motion Perception: A Fragile Process , 1993, Perception.

[23]  J. Duncan Similarity between concurrent visual discriminations: Dimensions and objects , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Thomas F. Shipley,et al.  Perceiving Objects Across Gaps in Space and Time , 1992 .

[26]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Perceiving Complex Visual Scenes: An Oscillator Neural Network Model that Integrates Selective Attention, Perceptual Organization, and Invariant Recognition , 1992, NIPS.

[27]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[28]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Binding Hierarchies: A Basis for Dynamic Perceptual Grouping , 1992, Neural Computation.

[29]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. , 1992 .

[30]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  P. Kellman,et al.  Perception of Partly Occluded Objects and Illusory Figures: Evidence for an Identity Hypothesis , 1992 .

[32]  Christopher K. I. Williams,et al.  Learning to Segment Images Using Dynamic Feature Binding , 1991, Neural Computation.

[33]  M. Goodale,et al.  Orientation Discrimination in a Visual Form Agnosic: Evidence from the McCollough Effect , 1991 .

[34]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  P. Kellman,et al.  A theory of visual interpolation in object perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Transparency: Relation to Depth, Subjective Contours, Luminance, and Neon Color Spreading , 1990, Perception.

[37]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Amodal Representation of Occluded Surfaces: Role of Invisible Stimuli in Apparent Motion Correspondence , 1990, Perception.

[38]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[39]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.

[41]  K Nakayama,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded Objects , 1989, Perception.

[42]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  W Gerbino,et al.  The effect of a modal completion on visual matching. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[44]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information , 1984 .

[46]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Human and Machine Vision , 1983 .

[47]  E. Spelke,et al.  Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  D. Broadbent Task combination and selective intake of information. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[49]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Recovery of the Three-Dimensional Shape of an Object from a Single View , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[50]  W Prinzmetal,et al.  Principles of feature integration in visual perception , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[53]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  D. Marr,et al.  Analysis of occluding contour , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[55]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[56]  J S Lappin,et al.  Attention in the identification of stimuli in complex visual displays. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[57]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[58]  M. Valdés-Sosa,et al.  Switching Attention without Shifting the Spotlight: Object-Based Attentional Modulation of Brain Potentials , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  J. Duncan Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. , 1996 .

[60]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  14. Object-based visual selection and the principle of uniform conneectedness , 1996 .

[61]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[62]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  The handbook of brain theory and neural networks , 1995, A Bradford book.

[63]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[64]  G. Baylis Visual attention and objects: Two-object cost with equal convexity. , 1994 .

[65]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Principles of Object Perception , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[66]  K Nakayama,et al.  Toward a neural understanding of visual surface representation. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[67]  L. Zimba,et al.  The covert orienting of attention to stereoscopic targets , 1990 .

[68]  Thomas O. Binford,et al.  Segmentation and aggregation: an approach to figure-ground phenomena , 1987 .

[69]  A. Witkin,et al.  On the Role of Structure in Vision , 1983 .

[70]  Walter Gerbino,et al.  Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? , 1982 .

[71]  J. Beck Organization and representation in perception , 1982 .

[72]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[73]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[74]  R. Gregory The intelligent eye , 1970 .

[75]  M. Wertheimer Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .