The Web as an Object of Study

INTRODUCTION Over the last decade, as email, the world wide web and various digital technologies have emerged, scholars of new media have employed a variety of methodological strategies to explore the social, political and cultural phenomena associated with the growth of these applications. Several recently-published edited volumes highlight the range of methods employed in research regarding social dimensions of internet technologies (Gauntlett, 2000; Howard and Jones, 2003; Jones, 1999; Mann and Stewart, 2000). These collections, along with recent issues of scholarly journals, demonstrate that traditional methods of social research, such as ethnography (e.g. Hakken, 1999; Hine, 2000; Markham, 1998), textual analysis (e.g. Crowston and Williams, 2000; Mitra, 1999; Mitra and Cohen, 1999), focus groups (e.g. Price and Capella, 2001, Stromer-Galley and Foot, 2002), surveys (e.g. Parks and Floyd, 1996; Schmidt, 1997; Smith, 1997; Yun and Trumbo, 2000) and experiments (e.g. Iyengar, 2002) have been adapted for use online in order to investigate both online and offline phenomena. In addition, some scholars have found it useful to employ internet applications as bases for studies of purely offline phenomena (e.g. Witte et al., 2000). However, our focus is on the development of methods for studying the social dimensions of the internet itself, and in particular, the web. As the web has emerged as a distinct media form in the past 10 years, it has been viewed increasingly as an object of study by social researchers. The ongoing evolution of the web poses challenges for scholars as they seek to develop methodological approaches that permit robust examination of web new media & society

[1]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the World-Wide Web , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  H. Park Hyperlink network analysis: A new method for the study of social structure on the web , 2003 .

[3]  Ananda Mitra,et al.  Analyzing the Web: Directions and Challenges , 1999 .

[4]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Hyperlink Analyses of the World Wide Web: A Review , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  Dave D'Alessio,et al.  Use of the World Wide Web in the 1996 US Election , 1997 .

[6]  Kirsten A. Foot,et al.  Crisis Communication and New Media: The Web after September 11 , 2004 .

[7]  Noortje Marres,et al.  French Scandals on the Web, and on the Streets: A Small Experiment in Stretching the Limits of Reported Reality , 2002 .

[8]  William C. Schmidt,et al.  World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions , 1997 .

[9]  Dave D'Alessio,et al.  Adoption of the World Wide Web by American Political Candidates, 1996-1998 , 2000 .

[10]  S. Parman Cyborgs @ Cyberspace?: An Ethnographer Looks to the Future , 2000 .

[11]  David Gauntlett,et al.  Web. Studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age , 2000 .

[12]  Steven R. Corman,et al.  An Evaluation of the Drug Resistance Project: A Comparison of Film Versus Live Performance Media , 1993 .

[13]  Kirsten A. Foot,et al.  Analyzing Linking Practices: Candidate Sites in the 2002 US Electoral Web Sphere , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Gi Woong Yun,et al.  Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail, & Web Form , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  Malcolm R. Parks Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[16]  川本 敬之 Appearance と Reality : 『貴婦人の群れ』試論 , 1996 .

[17]  Christine B. Smith,et al.  Casting the Net: Surveying an Internet Population , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Thomas R. Lindlof,et al.  Media Ethnography in Virtual Space: Strategies, Limits, and Possibilities , 1998 .

[19]  P. Howard,et al.  Research Methodology , 2000 .

[20]  Andrew M. Odlyzko Content is Not King , 2001, First Monday.

[21]  Annette N. Markham,et al.  Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space , 1998 .

[22]  Philip N. Howard,et al.  Network Ethnography and the Hypermedia Organization: New Media, New Organizations, New Methods , 2002, New Media Soc..

[23]  Sally J. McMillan Health Communication and the Internet: Relations Between Interactive Characteristics of the Medium and Site Creators, Content, and Purpose , 1999 .

[24]  Kirsten A. Foot,et al.  Online Action in Campaign 2000: An Exploratory Analysis of the U.S. Political Web Sphere , 2002 .

[25]  P. Stokowski,et al.  Languages of Place and Discourses of Power: Constructing New Senses of Place , 2002 .

[26]  Nicholas C. Burbules,et al.  Watch It: The Risks And Promises Of Information Technologies For Education , 2000 .

[27]  Mark Fischetti,et al.  Weaving the web - the original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web by its inventor , 1999 .

[28]  M. Spinks Doing internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the net , 2001 .

[29]  Peter Lyman,et al.  Archiving Digital Cultural Artifacts: Organizing an Agenda for Action , 1998, D Lib Mag..

[30]  P. Howard,et al.  Society Online: The Internet in Context , 2003 .

[31]  Michele H. Jackson Assessing the Structure of Communication on the World Wide Web , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  Experimental Designs for Political Communication Research: From Shopping Malls to the Internet , 2001 .

[33]  Ananda Mitra Characteristics of the WWW Text: mTracing Discursive Strategies , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  P. Howard,et al.  Method and Representation in Internet-Based Survey Tools— Mobility, Community, and Cultural Identity in Survey2000 , 2000 .

[35]  Barbara Warnick,et al.  Appearance or reality? Political parody on the web in campaign ‘96 , 1998 .

[36]  Kirsten A. Foot,et al.  Online Structure for Political Action: Exploring Presidential Campaign Web Sites from the 2000 American Election , 2002 .

[37]  Laura J. Gurak,et al.  Critical Literacy in a Digital Era: Technology, Rhetoric, and the Public Interest, by Barbara Warnick. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002. xi + 146 pp. $39.95 cloth. $18.00 paperback. ISBN 0-805-84115-6. , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[38]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Citizen Perceptions of Online Interactivity and Implications for Political Campaign Communication , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  N. Marres,et al.  Landscaping climate change: a mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web , 2000 .

[40]  Fiona Stewart,et al.  Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online , 2000 .

[41]  N. Baym Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community , 1999 .