Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing for comparative high-resolution DNA methylation analysis

We describe a large-scale random approach termed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) for analyzing and comparing genomic methylation patterns. BglII restriction fragments were size-selected to 500–600 bp, equipped with adapters, treated with bisulfite, PCR amplified, cloned and sequenced. We constructed RRBS libraries from murine ES cells and from ES cells lacking DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and 3b and with knocked-down (kd) levels of Dnmt1 (Dnmt[1kd,3a−/−,3b−/−]). Sequencing of 960 RRBS clones from Dnmt[1kd,3a−/−,3b−/−] cells generated 343 kb of non-redundant bisulfite sequence covering 66212 cytosines in the genome. All but 38 cytosines had been converted to uracil indicating a conversion rate of >99.9%. Of the remaining cytosines 35 were found in CpG and 3 in CpT dinucleotides. Non-CpG methylation was >250-fold reduced compared with wild-type ES cells, consistent with a role for Dnmt3a and/or Dnmt3b in CpA and CpT methylation. Closer inspection revealed neither a consensus sequence around the methylated sites nor evidence for clustering of residual methylation in the genome. Our findings indicate random loss rather than specific maintenance of methylation in Dnmt[1kd,3a−/−,3b−/−] cells. Near-complete bisulfite conversion and largely unbiased representation of RRBS libraries suggest that random shotgun bisulfite sequencing can be scaled to a genome-wide approach.

[1]  C. Scheuring,et al.  Construction of Large‐Insert Bacterial Clone Libraries and their Applications , 2007 .

[2]  James R. Knight,et al.  Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors , 2005, Nature.

[3]  W. Lam,et al.  Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Stephan Beck,et al.  From genome to epigenome. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[5]  Vincent Colot,et al.  Profiling DNA methylation patterns using genomic tiling microarrays , 2005, Nature Methods.

[6]  W. Richard McCombie,et al.  Sorghum Genome Sequencing by Methylation Filtration , 2005, PLoS biology.

[7]  Andrew P Feinberg,et al.  The epigenetics of cancer etiology. , 2004, Seminars in cancer biology.

[8]  Antony V. Cox,et al.  DNA Methylation Profiling of the Human Major Histocompatibility Complex: A Pilot Study for the Human Epigenome Project , 2004, PLoS biology.

[9]  T. Chevassut,et al.  Severe Global DNA Hypomethylation Blocks Differentiation and Induces Histone Hyperacetylation in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[10]  Michael Black,et al.  Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control , 2004, Nature.

[11]  P. Sharp,et al.  Cre-lox-regulated conditional RNA interference from transgenes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Yoshiyuki Sakaki,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of allelic methylation status of CpG islands on human chromosome 21q. , 2004, Genome research.

[13]  E. Li,et al.  Establishment and Maintenance of Genomic Methylation Patterns in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells by Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[14]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Induction of Tumors in Mice by Genomic Hypomethylation , 2003, Science.

[15]  P. Laird Early detection: The power and the promise of DNA methylation markers , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[16]  A. Bird,et al.  Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[17]  W. Reik,et al.  Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse , 2003, Genesis.

[18]  Laurence H. Pearl,et al.  Structural basis for uracil recognition by archaeal family B DNA polymerases , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[19]  S Beck,et al.  Epigenomics: genome-wide study of methylation phenomena. , 2002, Current issues in molecular biology.

[20]  K. Robertson DNA methylation and chromatin – unraveling the tangled web , 2002, Oncogene.

[21]  E. Li,et al.  Genetic analyses of DNA methyltransferase genes in mouse model system. , 2002, The Journal of nutrition.

[22]  B. Ramsahoye,et al.  Measurement of genome wide DNA methylation by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. , 2002, Methods.

[23]  Peter A. Jones,et al.  The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  En Li,et al.  De novo methylation of MMLV provirus in embryonic stem cells: CpG versus non-CpG methylation. , 2002, Gene.

[25]  Albert Jeltsch,et al.  Beyond Watson and Crick: DNA Methylation and Molecular Enzymology of DNA Methyltransferases , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[26]  T. Bestor,et al.  Methylation dynamics of imprinted genes in mouse germ cells. , 2002, Genomics.

[27]  Andrew P Feinberg,et al.  A genome-wide screen for normally methylated human CpG islands that can identify novel imprinted genes. , 2002, Genome research.

[28]  P. Laird,et al.  Combined bisulfite restriction analysis (COBRA). , 2002, Methods in molecular biology.

[29]  B. Ramsahoye Nearest-neighbor analysis. , 2002, Methods in molecular biology.

[30]  A. Bird DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. , 2002, Genes & development.

[31]  Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome , 2002, Nature.

[32]  Christoph Grunau,et al.  Bisulfite genomic sequencing: systematic investigation of critical experimental parameters , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  T. Bestor,et al.  The DNA methyltransferases of mammals. , 2000, Human molecular genetics.

[34]  A. Wolffe,et al.  DNA methylation in health and disease , 2000, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[35]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  An SNP map of the human genome generated by reduced representation shotgun sequencing , 2000, Nature.

[36]  A. Bird,et al.  Non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Robert A. Martienssen,et al.  Differential methylation of genes and retrotransposons facilitates shotgun sequencing of the maize genome , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[38]  D. Haber,et al.  DNA Methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b Are Essential for De Novo Methylation and Mammalian Development , 1999, Cell.

[39]  M. Davey,et al.  Urea improves efficiency of bisulphite-mediated sequencing of 5'-methylcytosine in genomic DNA. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  C. Walsh,et al.  Transcription of IAP endogenous retroviruses is constrained by cytosine methylation , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[41]  E. Li,et al.  Cloning and characterization of a family of novel mammalian DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[42]  R. Jaenisch DNA methylation and imprinting: why bother? , 1997, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[43]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  De novo DNA cytosine methyltransferase activities in mouse embryonic stem cells. , 1996, Development.

[44]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality , 1992, Cell.

[45]  L. E. McDonald,et al.  A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  J. Mattick,et al.  'Touchdown' PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  V. Chapman,et al.  Cell lineage-specific undermethylation of mouse repetitive DNA , 1984, Nature.